http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/09/12/some-evanston-residents-hope...
Source: Cbslocal.com. By Jim Williams
They may end up reconfiguring the bike lanes on Dodge Avenue.
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
(sigh...) Time to go back to sharrows. The idea of putting a bike lane between the curb and parked cars is a recipe for disaster.
Intersections need a lot of parking removed for visibility with the curbside bike lane model, but it makes a lot more sense to me to use a row of parked cars to protect cyclists than to use the cyclists to protect a row of curbside parked cars.
They had a bike lane before, it was just on the left side of the parked cars. I wonder what their plan for snow removal was.
How does it "slow traffic down" or make it "more congested" when it's a two lane road with or without the bike lanes?
Motorists saying it's "trying their patience". Hmmm. I rode through a week and a half ago and the protected bike lanes were blocked by construction horses in several spots - one was because someone was repaving their walk (sidewalk) leading to the curb. There was a horse and scrap wood in the protected bike lane long after the walk dried. It's not easy getting around a horse that blocks the entire protected bike lane. Now reading this, Evanston sounds like they need to address the concerns and respect the bike lanes they decided to build (keeping them clear of debris).
They went from traffic lane+bike lane+parking spaces (moving from the center of the street to the curb on either side) to traffic lane+parking spaces+door zone+bike lane. The door zone stole a bit from the bike lane and (I think) a bit from the traffic lane, so, in theory, traffic should be calmed down a bit.
The residents along Dodge aren't calm at all, however. In fact, it seems like they really have their knickers in a twist. Their main complaints seem to be
I've ridden Dodge a few times. I'm not happy with the changes, but I'll live with it. I don't travel Dodge on a bike much.
Here I thought Evanston thought of itself as "progressive."
I could not be at the meeting because of a work conflict and perhaps that is just as well. I agree with Mike W. as regards the lane on Dodge. I strongly prefer the sharrows that were already there. As far as I am concerned a model lane is the one on Main St in Skokie. I think most lanes should be modeled on that lane. On the other hand, the complaints raised by the residents make even less sense to me than the protected lane. Had I been present I would have made enemies of everybody. :-)
This being said, I rode that lane this morning later than normal, about 730 am. I saw a number of young riders in the lane presumably going to school. There was more bike traffic than I have seen in the past. I guess it is doing something.
I'm not familiar with Skokie. How is the Main St. lane there configured?
I think there's a perception by some that it's an improvement. Certainly parents seem to believe the new configuration is better for their kids. Perception is not necessarily reality. My guess is the aldermen have gotten an earful. I've voice my concerns regarding the changes with Katie Knapp (?).
Here's a petition to keep and improve the lanes on Dodge:
https://www.change.org/p/evanston-city-clerk-rodney-improve-not-rem...
I'm not a big fan of the sharrow because motorists don't necessarily respect them. I've been cut off on Dodge by motorists ignoring the sharrow so I'd like to see them improve the lanes on Dodge and keep having bike lanes.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members