Tags:
This needs support before next week. If Manor drive is to be more bike friendly, it needs support now. Please call Alderman Deb Mell. It is not supported by residents in Ravenswood Manor, but is supported by the surrounding neighborhoods who face dangerous fast traffic on residential streets with lots of children present. Thank you!
Nathan, I have not heard 1 person in the neighborhood of Ravenswood Manor say they do not want more bikes to go down Manor. I think what most people are concerned over is that this diverter as planned will make it much more dangerous for bikers, drivers and pedestrians to travel through the intersection of Manor and Wilson AND intersections directly to the east and west as angry car drivers will be seeking alternate routes to go north and south. By all the n/s cars TURNING. The increase in cars turning at this intersection will be what...50% and at the others too. Tell me how is it safe for bikes to go straight and ALL cars forced to turn? How? And all that diverted traffic will go where? To other narrow neighborhood streets. Is that fair for those that use those streets? Manor should be used by ANYBODY who wants to use it. This is the city. Not the suburbs. Share the road, respect the stop signs, and each other. Everybody needs to follow the rules of the road and it would work as it is today. Especially if you through in a few more speed humps with bike cutouts. If you are a biker, you should be WAY more concerned with riding through Horner where the sidewalk/bikepath is used by people, dogs and squirrels...Manor is not your problem north of Addison. Horner is. Good luck with that.
Betty, you might want to take a step back and read what you wrote, "much more dangerous for bikers, drivers and pedestrians to travel through the intersection of Manor and Wilson AND intersections directly to the east and west as angry car drivers will be seeking alternate routes to go north and south. "
Are you saying drivers will be angry, therefore cyclists are in danger? I'm going to hope I just misread this post.
You are correct, this is "not the suburbs" and the streets are narrow enough that there are parts of it the city has had to creatively rethink. Legally, the sidewalk is not an option unless you are a child. You can't fault cyclists for wanting safe passage on their way home. Every day we all see motorists showing impatience, driving while distracted, and many times cyclists are blamed. Like everyone else, cyclists just want to make it home safely to our families and loved ones. Convenient parking may sometimes need to be compromised to achieving goals to make a location safer for pedestrians and cyclists.
replies such as this one make me hope that the new Chainlink's forum will have an upvoting feature of some kind. Well said!
Thanks Tony! There are "likes" with the new site. Just finishing up Memphis and then I'll go back and finish Chicago.
It is "angry car drivers" who are a danger to pedestrians and cyclists (and, to a lesser degree, other car drivers, whether angry or not.) It is the responsibility of these people not to hurt less vulnerable people, especially if they are "angry." it is not the burden of others to accomodate one's anger.
How do you think that this proposed change will be "much more dangerous" for, apparently, everyone?
I do not think that there is much weight to be put on what ordinary people who do not ride on city streets think is safe for cyclists.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members