This in my e-mail from Active Trans:
|
Tags:
Fantastic news.
Chapeau.
???????--protected bike lanes are crazy? Active Trans is crazy? Passing along the story is crazy? Steve saying "hat" in French is crazy? Sean thinking this is good news is crazy?
Jennifer on the lake said:
Man, the crazies sure do come out earlier and earlier. It's not even next winter yet!
Just stumbled across this article from the tribune.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-bikes-lane...
As both a driver and a cyclist I think his observations are good. When I'm cycling I'm thinking about what drivers would do. I run red lights early in the morning when nobody is around. At rush hour I hold my lane at lights and move when I feel comfortable with drivers passing. And sometimes I've just screwed up and been fortunate.
In the meantime northbound Clybourn has been fantastic. You basically have over 50% of the street to yourself from Division to Halsted. Southbound in the morning not so much fun.
Chicago does not have any protected bike lanes at this time. Clybourn will be the first. I just hope pedestrians stay out of it.
Chicago does not have any protected bike lanes at this time. Clybourn will be the first.
Not quite. Concrete barrier-protected lanes were installed through Douglas Park recently.
Any they are NICE but how long will the pavement be maintained as NEW and SMOOTH?
WE Slow rollers rode this last Sunday, Slow-Roll!
Ah I was not aware of that! Good to know. In general I just bristle a bit whenever I hear someone refer to the bollard separated bike lanes as protected.
I think they are considered protected because parked cars separate the cyclists from moving cars.
Of course, the entrances to the lanes on Broadway in Uptown are often blocked by idling cars and nothing is ever done about it.
Does anyone know why Clybourn is a state-protected route? Are there other like-protected routes in the city (Elston, Lincoln?) Am curious why the state is involved in what appears to be a municipal matter.
I ask the above because my understanding is that getting protected lanes is not as simple as lobbying the city. It seems there are other interested-parties that need to be aware or even authorize. I would like to start working on getting Elston established from Damen to Milwaukee the same way. We are almost there, but not quite. Maybe even get Damen done from say Lawrence down to Milwaukee.
States and the federal government have an interest in building and maintaining long-distance road networks. They provide funding for the maintenance and improvement of these roads but also dictate the roadway design. Why is Clybourn state owned? Probably for historical reasons that are no longer relevant. Chicago could take jurisdiction of Clybourn if IDOT felt this route was now unimportant to its interests, but this could lead to a loss of funding. So, its all a money issue. There are many, many state-owned roads in Chicago.
Also, lol @ continuing to fuck up Elston while ignoring the genuine stress point at NB Elston and Ashland. Keep PBL shit out of the northwest side.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members