Hey friends on wheels,
I'm a part of a volunteer cultural committee putting on a big concert and rally for Chuy Garcia next Sunday, March 29, at Alhambra Palace downtown Chicago. I am still in need of a few additional volunteers:
Setup
Cleanup
Poster and postcard distribution this week
One more SECURITY volunteer (experience and formidable presence helpful)
Please email me at poptart@gmail.com if you are interested in supporting this candidate and this event next week. It's going to be incredibly diverse, energizing, and fun!
Thanks!
Tags:
Agreed. The absence of substance on financial issues this late in the game is disturbing to say the least. I wish that Tuesday's debate had been longer and covered more topics.
In my experience, conspiracy theorists are almost always wrong. The reason being that conspiracies rarely work, and if they do, they don't work for very long. The more people involved in the conspiracy, the greater the chance for someone to talk-and somebody eventually talks.
In order to buy into this "City finances veil of secrecy" talking point/theory, you have to believe that the mayor, each and every employee of the City Finance Department, and auditor Deloitte & Touche LLP are all willing to trust each other to keep their mouths shut or risk criminal prosecution and civil liability.
The City of Chicago is required to file an audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report within six months of year end. The most recent available report is for 2013. They are also required to provide bond ratings agencies, underwriters and investors with detailed financial statements because as we all know Chicago has issued municipal bonds in the United States bond markets. Providing false information or omitting material information exposes the actors to civil and criminal liability.
So can we just agree that this "veil of secrecy" thing is political rhetoric which had limited traction or "stickiness" and move on from there?
You mean to actually say proponents of conspiracy theories realize they're probably incorrect when presented with evidence or logic and then change their minds???
I thought it was funny how during the debate a few nights ago Rahm got fed up with that attack and eventually asked Chuy if he was going to the state's attorney office with his evidence since those were some pretty serious allegations. Chuy doubled down on the city never gets audited. Doh! I want to want to vote for the guy but he keeps opening his mouth and saying things.
It was recently disclosed that the city is owed $1.5 billion in unpaid parking/speeding tickets. The mayor's office issued a statement that 70% of those fines are from before Rahm was elected and stretches back as far as 20 years.
So why hasn't the city written that off as uncollectible? Probably because every year that gets added to the budget as income that will be collected. That is why Rahm always talks about "balancing the budget" and not about ending the year with net income. Projections are made even if the results are unattainable.
I don't think the city keeps two sets of books, but there certainly are manipulations that happen, like not providing housing vouchers even though CHA is taking money from the federal government to do so.
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20140730/NEWS12/140739986/ch...
As far as "conspiracy theorists", that would have been a good label to use regarding people who claimed banks were colluding to fix the LIBOR rate. That turned out to be true.
$100 to meet Chuy at the Unity in the Community rally. What a deal. Is there a correlation between men with mustaches and bad leaders. I'd like to see the venn diagram on that
Pay to Say (hello)
This is not an endorsement for either candidate. I vote to disrupt the system. http://apps.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/rahm-emanuel-con...
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members