11-15-18 Update - Large Percentage of Divvy Fleet Missing! Serious Loss Problems for Chicago's Bike Share 7-12-18

Divvy should consider adding an easily identifiable bike numbering system in order to assist authorities in determining the status of their fleet. 

The News Corner:

Serious Loss Problems for Divvy

"Locking systems easily compromised by thieves."

For the full article:

http://www.cwbchicago.com/2018/07/compromised-lock-system-has-divvy...

I have been seeing a lot more 'free range' Divvy bikes lately. 

Views: 4007

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In one report, I read where one of the perps claims someone sold the bike to him for a few bucks.

Furthermore, by "lower risk of loss", you mean one has little to lose when it's "free"?

What can be done? Do you have any proposals/ideas to help reduce the motivations for the thefts?

They're still there... 6:25AM. 

Sadly, Tom, I don't think there's that much to be done in the short term other than to better secure the bikes. Even in a better world, there would always be thieves. I've lived in the city proper for almost 40 years now, and I couldn't even count the number of times I've seen things stolen seemingly for no reason at all. The answer to "Why"? is the proverbial "Because it's there". Why could possible want a beat-up plastic water bottle? Yet, I've had probably a dozen of them taken. Numerous tiny little lights. Bike computers, obviously useless without the bracket or wiring. The shiny part only of mirrors. Crappy ring-a-ding things. Even valve caps, just the regular ones. My conclusion is that some people steal indiscriminately, and that they will always be around. They will still be there even if the world becomes more just, verdant, and peaceful (to quote the MacArthur Foundation, via NPR). Not that there's any danger of that happening right at the moment.

My reaction to all this has been to learn how to secure my bike and its appurtenances more effectively. That's what the Divvys of the world have to learn, too. They are especially vulnerable because for every vulnerability, there are a thousand or more bikes that can be exploited in the same way. You would have thought that those locking mechanisms would have been their first priority, and tested incredibly thoroughly before they were ever deployed. This is also why I don't believe a self-sustaining true dockless system is possible in Chicago, at least not at a price point affordable for those who need it the most. If you gave a free bike to every person in Chicago who asked for one, bikes would still be stolen.

We're far from the only ones with this problem, either:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr-gridlock/wp/2018/07/01/theft...

Of course, none of that means that we should stop striving, constantly, for that more just, verdant, and peaceful world. It will still require some locking up, though.

Yes Jim, that seems to be the reality of the situation. 

"If you gave a free bike to every person in Chicago who asked for one, bikes would still be stolen."

True, and sad.

Over 120 arrested in Divvy thefts!

Insider information is indicating that perhaps up to 20% of the Divvy fleet of bikes has gone missing during the recent theft surge.

http://www.cwbchicago.com/2018/08/over-120-arrested-since-july-1st-...

Check out the CWB's social media's pic list of stolen Divvy bikes which even includes those submitted from a few Chainlink members. 

That's awful. Happened very close to where I live.

Hey, in case nobody has pointed it out on this thread, CWB Chicago reports that roughly *two* percent of the Divvy fleet, 120 bikes out of about 6,000, has been stolen (and recovered), not twenty: http://www.cwbchicago.com/2018/08/over-120-arrested-since-july-1st-...

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service