The Chainlink

When will the Trail Separation project be completed?

So my girlfriend just informed me that she was in a bike-on-bike accident on the Lakefront Trail at Belmont. It's an area where separation has occurred and lines have been painted. But the old lines still exist and there is no transition from old to new lines, nor direction for pedestrians and bikers on which lanes to choose.

This area has bugged the crap out of me for a long while now. A couple of weeks ago, I honestly seriously considered creating my own stencils and bringing some paint out there and doing it myself.

So, anybody know when it's going to be finished? Or is this going to need to be a DIY project?

Views: 2062

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree it sucks. Hope your girlfriend was not seriously injured.  Some complaints/updates at and

That stinks :( 

Many close calls there as well because of the line discrepancy. 

Even when (if) it will be completed, who and how will enforce that separation?

This isn't behavior that can be "enforced". Good design doesn't need enforcement. If it's done properly, people will want to use the correct trails (and it will be clear which trail is for which purpose).

If a public space requires mall cops out there on Segways yelling at people policing how they're using public space, either the designers screwed up, or the expectations of use aren't in line with what the public wants. 

Yeah, right. Like people obey traffic signals and street markings. I observe 'what public wants' every day.

The concrete bit at Belmont is one path, just like the trail to the north. The separation is south of Belmont. Just follow the yellow line, except on the bridge over Diversy Harbor. And don't end up going in a circle around the totem pole. Or take the longer 'bike only' path around Cricket Hill. Or the Montrose underpass if it's been raining.

What else am I missing?

I don't think you're missing anything. The only confusing segment of the trail is the straight stretch along the Belmont Harbor. Are there pedestrian lanes on both sides of the bike path? Are there two-lane bike and pedestrian paths side-by-side? The markings there are not very clear.

Better markings will help separate runners and cyclists (except for Belmont to Ardmore), but just as dangerous are the narrower, bike-only sections of the LFT.  The new design allows for a total of only 3 cyclists abreast to safely pass each other, including oncoming cyclists.  In some of the combined sections, the lanes are so narrow it's not safe to pass at all if there is an oncoming cyclist. Combined with not having to worry about clueless runners pulling blind u-turns, cycle traffic is now faster with greater variance in speeds creating more passing conflicts.  Yesterday (May 15th) was the most chaotic I've experienced in my 2,400 round trips on the north LFT over the past 13 years.  There were many near-misses with oncoming cyclists and racers attempting double-passes regardless of conditions.  This is very dangerous for middled-paced riders like me. 

While the new configuration will reduce cyclist/runner u-turn crashes, there will now be many more-serious bike-on-bike crashes like the one I came across this morning just north of the pedestrian bridge.  Speed limits won't make a difference, instead, there needs to be common courtesy when it comes to passing safely.

True, the new bike trails are narrower, with mud bogs or sand for shoulders.

Agree, the new bike trail is only 12 feet wide, and is too narrow to safely pass another cyclist with any oncoming traffic. It should be wider. 

 I was on the LFP this weekend.  Belmont at the harbor is a garbage fire.  The markings are totally unclear as to who rides/walks where.

Yeah, that area sucks A LOT!


© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service