Tags:
sorry to hear that. Happy you made it out with just some bruises.
How would suicide doors (what you are referring to) make cyclists safer?
People would still fling them open, but we'd just have a ramp to shoot us into traffic.
The safest way is to have sliding doors (ala vans), but this is impractical on most cars.
peter moormann said:
Should make car doors hinged at the back, for biker safety.
There could be a big class action liability lawsuit against auto makers by biker forcing them to make
car doors less dangerous.
Whats Ralphy up to these days anyway?
they just repaved and restriped most of that stretch of roosevelt so actually the lines and decals are very bright!
Even if there's no bike lane people should always check their mirrors before opening their doors. Not just for us, but for any traffic. I wish that would be emphasized in driver's ed programs and license tests.
That happened to me a few years back on Damen. You never expect to get doored on your left side.
driver's side rear passengers can be a problem. They cannot see anything. This past weekend I was that passenger while we were in some bike friendly areas in Wisconsin. Fortunately, the driver looked. I reacted to him. If he did not look It would have been tough for me to figure out when it was safe to open the door. I am not sure about a solution for this. The suggestion for a door hinged the other way creates a very dangerous mousetrap. If you run into that door on your bike the offending person could be very seriously injured by being pinned by the door. Notwithstanding their offense of opening the door they do not deserve to be crushed.
Heather said:
Even if there's no bike lane people should always check their mirrors before opening their doors. Not just for us, but for any traffic. I wish that would be emphasized in driver's ed programs and license tests.
I believe it's illegal to open the door of a car that's in a traveling lane. Some of the lawyers on chainlink will know for sure.
I hate to say this, but why not? Opening a door into traffic exposes the person who has done NOTHING wrong to being crushed by a truck, bus or car in addition to the lesser harm of being thrown from the bicycle to the pavement. Why should we argue that changing designs so that the wrong doer is harmed rather than the innocent person is a "bad" change in design.
David Barish said:
. Notwithstanding their offense of opening the door they do not deserve to be crushed.
Agree about rear passengers. The only time I ever got seriously doored was by a cab in heavy traffic. Dude felt guilty as hell. He even said that he expected me to punch him, but I couldn't get mad at him. There was really no way for him to see me coming. If anything, it was the cabbie's fault for not pulling all the way to the curb.
just requires more education which it sounds like the city is doing. I have seen decals on cabs now which is a step in the right direction.
Maurice said:
Agree about rear passengers. The only time I ever got seriously doored was by a cab in heavy traffic. Dude felt guilty as hell. He even said that he expected me to punch him, but I couldn't get mad at him. There was really no way for him to see me coming. If anything, it was the cabbie's fault for not pulling all the way to the curb.
Mom parks in a parking lane. She is correctly parked. Her six year old child is feeling like a big girl now. She opens the door to the car because she figured out how to do it. She is proud of herself....
...sure we can then say that 20 year old college student who's parents have slaved to get her through school are in tears to find out [some horrible thing about their daughter being doored and killed]
...or more likely...was mortified when a door opened in the lane where she was riding. She tried to avoid the door but could not do so. She braced for impact and the newfangled thing closed upon the child like a guillotine. The image of those blonde locks locks on the head on the street haunted her forever
Yes. Dooring is bad. It is horrible when cyclists are injured or endangered by doors opening. No, people who open a door do not deserve to be crushed, impailed, drawn and quartered, crucified or given the comfy chair whether they are innocent little girls, unknowing grandmothers, or expletives in the backseat of a BMW. I may advocate a large cash settlement and or jail time in certain cases. However, I am not looking to hurt anybody else. I tend towards education and perhaps restitution rather than retribution.
Crazy David 84 Furlongs said:
I hate to say this, but why not? Opening a door into traffic exposes the person who has done NOTHING wrong to being crushed by a truck, bus or car in addition to the lesser harm of being thrown from the bicycle to the pavement. Why should we argue that changing designs so that the wrong doer is harmed rather than the innocent person is a "bad" change in design.
David Barish said:. Notwithstanding their offense of opening the door they do not deserve to be crushed.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members