Chainlink Admin: Please disble further comments from my last post about San Hamel

I did not mean to create a forum where people go back and forth attacking each other.

When I posted it I was angry finding out the details of the case surrounding my friends death. I was trying to create unity around the fact that this is a horrific thing and am also trying to grieve. It is true that I do not know San Hamel or what kind of person he is but what he did has devastated me and anyone who ever had the privilege of coming across Bobby Cann.   

What I did not what is this back and forth mud slinging that I have been watching occur all day. I am quite sickened and upset by it and do not find it helpful for anyone.

I do not know how to disable further comments or remove the post all together. So please would the organizers of Chainlink do this for me. 

Thanks

Views: 3015

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Manny - I haven't missed a day on my bike ever since this horrible accident, but I don't see anything productive about judging those that have.

Let's all stick together in this community - not tear each other down.  There are so many different types of cyclists in this city.  At the end of the day, the one thing we have in common is wanting to feel safe when we ride.

I don't see Manny judging anyone. He said was angry that people made the decision to stop riding. I agree with Manny that living itself is dangerous and that it is a mistake to live in fear. I didn't know Bobby Cann, but from what I've read about him since he was killed he seemed like a wonderful human being. I have the impression that he would not want us to stop riding.

What Manny said didn't strike me as tearing people down so much as to help us remain standing. 

blair_ said:

Manny - I haven't missed a day on my bike ever since this horrible accident, but I don't see anything productive about judging those that have.

Let's all stick together in this community - not tear each other down.  There are so many different types of cyclists in this city.  At the end of the day, the one thing we have in common is wanting to feel safe when we ride.



Tony Adams 6.6 mi said:

I have the impression that he would not want us to stop riding.




This is absolutely true.

Agreed, please stop comparing an act of terrorism to a drunk driving incident. They are not the same.

Why, because the terrorists weren't drunk ? LMAO !!!

Just kidding, Adam. I needed to change the mood. It was getting a bit too serious.

However, I do agree.

How many other drunk drivers have killed cyclists? (or anyone for that matter?)

We can unify ourselves for the sake of unifying.

We could use any of the bicycling community's deaths to help motivate us to stick together.

However, I choose to be motivated because I can make it a better future for myself and my children.
 
Adam Herstein (5.5 mi) said:

Agreed, please stop comparing an act of terrorism to a drunk driving incident. They are not the same.

Via Streetsblog Chicago I stumbled upon this Suntimes article about the Groupon currently being done around Bobby Cann's death.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/20566657-418/groupon-honors-staf...

It quotes a memorial piece written by Bobby's girlfriend, Catherine Bullard:

"Bobby talked about the Ride of Silence and Critical Mass bicycle rides like some people talk about church: a way to commune with others, to feel joy and belonging as a participant in Chicago’s culture."

I do not remember anyone articulating why I ride that clearly before...

"Bobby talked about the Ride of Silence and Critical Mass bicycle rides like some people talk about church: a way to commune with others, to feel joy and belonging as a participant in Chicago’s culture."

That's how I've often felt at large bike events.

They are not the same and yet they have similarities. In both cases, someone has a set of beliefs which they think are more important than human life. When they act on those beliefs sometimes people die. 

Adam Herstein (5.5 mi) said:

Agreed, please stop comparing an act of terrorism to a drunk driving incident. They are not the same.

I know it can feel better to have a full trial, but trust me, it's not the right route. First of all, the trial has the chance of the assailant getting off as not guilty. He could get off on some technicality – he did refuse a breathalyzer test. Another thread stated he has a good lawyer, and there is no doubt he will be looking for any and all possible technicalities to get him off. In addition, the trial would just be a waste of time and money for the state, even though a judgement of guilty is likely. Plea bargains are SOP for drunk driving cases, and he will likely still serve jail time. It would also get him off the streets faster. Justice still can be served via a plea bargain.

I will not be signing the petition.

clp said:

Thanks Tony.  I agree.   Both cases involve fighting our own irrational fear.  Fear of biking in traffic, fear of running in a crowd.

Incidentally a northside cyclist has put a petition on line that all Chainlinkers should sign immediately.   We want to make sure that this guy receives a FULL TRIAL with no chance of a plea bargain.  The story behind the on-line petition is here.

...A retired 72-year-old cyclist is leading a charge to prevent city prosecutors from accepting a plea bargain in the case against the driver...Robert Kastigar, a North Park resident, had never met Cann...But Kastigar said he had to do his part in standing up for the young cyclist...

You're missing the point; it is about the charges he will have to face and the charges he will be found guilty of.  Personally I want him to have to face, and carry with him, a homicide conviction vs. one for manslaughter.  


Adam Herstein (5.5 mi) said:

I know it can feel better to have a full trial, but trust me, it's not the right route. First of all, the trial has the chance of the assailant getting off as not guilty. In addition, the trial would just be a waste of time and money for the state, even though a judgement of guilty is likely. Plea bargains are SOP for drunk driving cases, and he will likely still serve jail time. It would also get him off the streets faster. Justice still can be served via a plea bargain.

I will not be signing the petition.

clp said:

Thanks Tony.  I agree.   Both cases involve fighting our own irrational fear.  Fear of biking in traffic, fear of running in a crowd.

Incidentally a northside cyclist has put a petition on line that all Chainlinkers should sign immediately.   We want to make sure that this guy receives a FULL TRIAL with no chance of a plea bargain.  The story behind the on-line petition is here.

...A retired 72-year-old cyclist is leading a charge to prevent city prosecutors from accepting a plea bargain in the case against the driver...Robert Kastigar, a North Park resident, had never met Cann...But Kastigar said he had to do his part in standing up for the young cyclist...

Adam, Do you work in the legal field? You do speak with certain authority that makes me think you do.

Adam Herstein (5.5 mi) said:

I know it can feel better to have a full trial, but trust me, it's not the right route. First of all, the trial has the chance of the assailant getting off as not guilty. He could get off on some technicality – he did refuse a breathalyzer test. Another thread stated he has a good lawyer, and there is no doubt he will be looking for any and all possible technicalities to get him off. In addition, the trial would just be a waste of time and money for the state, even though a judgement of guilty is likely. Plea bargains are SOP for drunk driving cases, and he will likely still serve jail time. It would also get him off the streets faster. Justice still can be served via a plea bargain.

I will not be signing the petition.

clp said:

Thanks Tony.  I agree.   Both cases involve fighting our own irrational fear.  Fear of biking in traffic, fear of running in a crowd.

Incidentally a northside cyclist has put a petition on line that all Chainlinkers should sign immediately.   We want to make sure that this guy receives a FULL TRIAL with no chance of a plea bargain.  The story behind the on-line petition is here.

...A retired 72-year-old cyclist is leading a charge to prevent city prosecutors from accepting a plea bargain in the case against the driver...Robert Kastigar, a North Park resident, had never met Cann...But Kastigar said he had to do his part in standing up for the young cyclist...

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but no, I do not work in the legal field.

Duppie 13.5185km said:

Adam, Do you work in the legal field? You do speak with certain authority that makes me think you do.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service