Hopefully you've heard by now that CDOT will begin construction this week on the city's first protected bike lane: Kinzie Street from Milwaukee Avenue/Desplaines Street to Wells Street.
Full story on Steven Can Plan.
I want to know what you think about this.
Cycle track and protected bike lane naysayers, this isn't the post for you. But if you've ridden in protected bike lanes before, then I welcome your constructive comments and criticism based on your actual experiences.
The new beginning. Looking southeast at the intersection of Kinzie/Milwaukee/Desplaines.
Tags:
Think we'll ever get something IN the loop?
How about Roosevelt crossing the river? That is effin' HORRIBLE right now due to the Congress construction, cars are maniacs using the alleged shared bike/bus lane...
I was told by CDOT folks a few years ago that Taylor was supposed to be the new bike corridor and there was money and plans to build out east of Canal and cross the river.
Would have rocked my world-- not sure what happened it that.
Cameron Puetz said:If anything is done with Roosevelt I hope it stretches all the way through the Lake Shore Drive intersection and connects to the Lake Front Path.
Carter O'Brien said:How about Roosevelt crossing the river? That is effin' HORRIBLE right now due to the Congress construction, cars are maniacs using the alleged shared bike/bus lane...
Or at least turn one's head to the side and LOOK to see if the intersection is clear before bombing through it...
+! iggi
iggi said:
you mean where the stop sign is? where bikes are supposed to stop?
you mean where the stop sign is? where bikes are supposed to stop?
ok. i stand corrected. but it is a crosswalk, and there is a stop for pedestrains and bikes (which i assume is for crossing bikes and pedestrians) and one should be slowing for that anyway as the crosswalk is clearly visible.
but that signage is kinda dumb. and hidden behind trees till last minute.
screenshot taken from travis kluska's video on youtube
Steven Vance said:
There's no stop sign for Kinzie traffic at Jefferson, but there is at Clinton and Canal. Jefferson is the first street, eastbound, at the bottom of the hill, between the park and the high-rise.
iggi said:you mean where the stop sign is? where bikes are supposed to stop?
I would agree a cyclist should at a minimum keep an eye out and check the lane when going through this intersection, especially given what basically amounts to a blind spot for right-turning cars. That's what I've started to do at least.
That said, the cyclist would clearly have the right-of-way here unless a pedestrian was crossing (or about to cross) Kinzie in the crosswalk, which is hardly ever it seems. I agree that this is the one spot on Kinize where the cycle track may have actually made things a bit more dangerous than before--and I say that as a fan of the protected lane. Besides adding a stop sign on Kinzie, though, not sure how you could design around this situation.
iggi said:
ok. i stand corrected. but it is a crosswalk, and there is a stop for pedestrains and bikes (which i assume is for crossing bikes and pedestrians) and one should be slowing for that anyway as the crosswalk is clearly visible.
but that signage is kinda dumb. and hidden behind trees till last minute.
screenshot taken from travis kluska's video on youtube
Steven Vance said:There's no stop sign for Kinzie traffic at Jefferson, but there is at Clinton and Canal. Jefferson is the first street, eastbound, at the bottom of the hill, between the park and the high-rise.
iggi said:you mean where the stop sign is? where bikes are supposed to stop?
we should be looking over our shoulders regardless while approaching and crossing intersections. is the idea behind the protected lane that we shouldnt have to do this?
john, the car that crept up to the intersection...was it an 'oh shit, bike' slam on brakes situation, or was it a typical 'dootdeedoo, im making a right turn' slow down approach made by the car? or somewhere in between? just trying to understand the situation better.
I would agree a cyclist should at a minimum keep an eye out and check the lane when going through this intersection, especially given what basically amounts to a blind spot for right-turning cars. That's what I've started to do at least.
That said, the cyclist would clearly have the right-of-way here unless a pedestrian was crossing (or about to cross) Kinzie in the crosswalk, which is hardly ever it seems. I agree that this is the one spot on Kinize where the cycle track may have actually made things a bit more dangerous than before--and I say that as a fan of the protected lane. Besides adding a stop sign on Kinzie, though, not sure how you could design around this situation.
iggi said:
ok. i stand corrected. but it is a crosswalk, and there is a stop for pedestrains and bikes (which i assume is for crossing bikes and pedestrians) and one should be slowing for that anyway as the crosswalk is clearly visible.
but that signage is kinda dumb. and hidden behind trees till last minute.
screenshot taken from travis kluska's video on youtube
Steven Vance said:There's no stop sign for Kinzie traffic at Jefferson, but there is at Clinton and Canal. Jefferson is the first street, eastbound, at the bottom of the hill, between the park and the high-rise.
iggi said:you mean where the stop sign is? where bikes are supposed to stop?
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members