I was inspired by Gin's discussion thread about Humboldt Park traffic calming and thought I'd talk about speed humps in general. I don't feel that speed humps are a very good traffic calming solution overall, because so many drivers speed up between the humps to make up for the time they lost by slowing for the humps. I often see more road rage behavior in these locations compared to the pre-speed hump configuration. I've seen this kind of behavior many, many times on Glenwood through Edgewater.
If we're going to have traffic calming, shouldn't it be done in such a way to make the street *more* desirable to cyclists instead of a literal pain in the butt? Some formerly good bike streets have become a lot less pleasant to ride over the last several years due to the proliferation of speed humps. On the north side, Glenwood and many east-west side streets in Uptown and Edgewater are good examples of this. From Logan Square heading west, Wrightwood used to be a good route to Montclare, Galewood and Oak Park, until it was marred by a ridiculous number of tall speed humps (often 2-3 per block), turning into a torture-fest. We don't need to ruin good bike routes. In some areas, we don't have enough good routes to begin with, especially going west to Oak Park.
One of the ideas suggested in that discussion was having a center cut through the speed hump to allow bike passage, as is done in some alleys. If we have cut-throughs for bikes, this gives bikes an advantage and can incentivize bike use in locations like this. Even without a full bike boulevard implementation, this change could turn a lot of currently annoying streets into better bike routes.
What do you think?
Tags:
I just learned that the mayor of our block (long time community activist) has been gathering signatures to put speed humps on our little stretch of McLean. Argh!!!!
The more streets they go into, the more other blocks want them. People are sick of speeding cars on residential streets. I do understand the desire to bring speeds down.
Anne, let's get a letter into CDOT/new CDOT commissioner/Active Trans requesting info on what our options are and how we achieve calmer streets w/o degrading the cycling environment, complicating emergency responses, adding noise, etc. Are you willing to take a crack at a first draft?
Another angle I am playing with is--if we are going to speed bumpify our residential streets, then we need to do a better job of making our collectors and arterials bike friendly. This is why I am so disappointed about what's happening in Humboldt Park: speed humps on Marin, and no bike accommodations in the "road diet" going through the park on Humboldt.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members