a) lack of bike lanes, or
b) bike lanes that are commonly considered regular car traffic lanes, or
c) general mixed message of CDOT on maintaining our lanes?
I will say that for me, 3,000+ miles per year was not uncommon. My trek was between 6.5 and 9.5 miles each way (depending on route) and I rode 5 days a week, year round. I really loved it riding. For you marketers, demographers, I was replacing my bike every 18 months and getting tune ups three times a year (beyond my own tuneups.)
Now, as I see cars regularly use the bike lane on Damen, Elston, Milwaukee and Des Plaines, I question how I ever got so brave to ride in the first place.
We really need to ask ourselves if we are being heard and supported. I am seeing the tide turn toward driving and cars using the whole road.
Flame away.
Tags:
When I feel down I think about how it was back in the 90's when I first came to town... That makes me feel better. I feel the frustration, too, though: sometimes it seems like we're headed for a UK-style culture war, but I gotta say I think if that's the case then we're actually winning: more and more cyclists riding each year and that's just the way it is! ...I hope!
I am so confused by this post.
So even though biking is WAY better than it was say 5 years ago you have recently become scared of it because cars are on the road?
Sounds more like you are getting tired of biking andd looking for excuses than there is any real issue with the roads.
How biking is depends on where you're biking. I certainly agree with others that biking is no picnic here on the southwest side. I appreciate what bike lanes there are, but we have no really good main east-west corridor. Archer, of course, would be the natural. The parts of the city that have lanes are better to bike than they were, but still not great.
In the big picture, from what I can tell Americans drive about twice as many miles in total than when I moved here in 1979. There aren't many new roads in Chicago. For all vehicles, especially motor vehicles, traffic is MUCH heavier than it was then. As population rises, even if per capita driving remains around the same, overall traffic increases. Commuting time for drivers has increased terrifically during that period. So maybe where notoriousDUG is biking is way better than five years ago. I would say that where I am, it's a bit better (except that drivers seem more angry). But overall, it's a lot harder to bike in the city in general than when I first showed up, because there are many, many more people on the roads.
Its even much worse for us cyclists on the southwest side of the city. I see more and more cyclists every year around my neighborhood near midway airport. There are virtually no bike lanes in my area.
make that "texting, car computer watching, sleep deprived zombies"
I'm actually to the southwest, too, and I agree with grayn8, sorta: Milwaukee is a funny change of pace for me, but it's just too much traffic and chaos (car and bike) to be a mellow ride. Riding to the southwest I can kinda pick whether I want to race traffic or just cruise along because even when there are several riders in sight we're not crowded. But that having been said I'd still like to see expanded bike lanes... They don't magically make it safer but at the very least they are a signal for car drivers to expect bikes, and the jerks abusing the lanes are a minority we all deal with either way... I'd rather they stand out, if you know what I mean.
Yes, the infrastructure we need are better LAWS, better driver (and cyclist) EDUCATION and ENFORCEMENT.
The fact that speed "limits" are viewed as "minimum required speed (and even then only when the cops are watching)" is a testimony on the mental state of the driving masses
The most pleasant part of my 9 mile commute is a 2.5 mile stretch on Higgins which has no bike pavement markings whatsoever, and yet cars still somehow figure out how to not run me over. Why do people think painting a stripe down is going to make a road good for biking in and of itself? (note to ATA: don't put a fucking PBL on Higgins)
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members