The Father of Bike Lanes Was Photographed Without a Helmet

http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/transportation/wa...

It's not necessary to *always* wear a helmet.

Views: 677

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on January 7, 2016 at 6:30am

Lots of roads and streets don't have bike lanes. 

Lots of riders don't wear helmets.

Permalink Reply by Tony Adams on January 7, 2016 at 6:52am

I see a pattern:

Permalink Reply by Jim Reho on January 7, 2016 at 7:19am

Geez, it's only a photo for an article.  Nothing to get bent out of shape over, helmet- or direction-wise.  If I thought my noggin was as safe without one, I wouldn't wear a helmet either.  However, on the south-side streets of Chicago, I'm looking for every protection I can find.  What others do is strictly up to them.  Illumination, however, is a whole different story.    

Permalink Reply by Yasmeen on January 7, 2016 at 7:25am

Just one of those hot topics. Should we throw in a discussion on hard stops vs. rolling stops and really get the party started? I have a match! ;-)

Permalink Reply by Karen R McGinnis on January 14, 2016 at 11:47am

I think people are smart enough to understand.

RSS

Groups

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service