Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Michael, it'd be fantastic if you could share your photo with Olympic medalist Nelson "Nelly" Vails as well as some of your experiences.
I am excited to say we are working with a few riders that are doing RABGRAI ride reports to share their experiences. Hoping to have at least one published in a little over a week's time.
I'll also be uploading a few of my photos shortly. With the huge number of riders at RAGBRAI, there are a lot of great stories to tell. It is unfortunate the only posts that have made it to the site so far have been about the tragic stories. I think part of that is due to the lack of access to internet for riders in Iowa.
No personal attacks, please! That is not appropriate on this forum. Please stop NOW.
This is a very heartfelt topic. One that so many of us feel and are very passionate about. I feel a certain amount of responsibility for the direction this thread took today. Michael had expressed this concern to me on RAGBRAI - we had a brief but incomplete conversation about it. The conversation was incomplete because it didn't reach a conclusion about whether we should be posting crashes and cycling-related deaths or not. Michael expressed his concern that our forum has taken a recent direction where these deaths have become too much of the focus. To a certain extent, I agree with him. I worry about new cyclists thinking this is all there is when even if these stories are heartbreaking to all of us, statistically, it's not a large number of cyclists. To give you a little background, Skip asked me about his thread, "Another cyclist fatality" and I fully supported his thread because we talked about raising awareness. I needed to think about how we could give this additional awareness but never really landed on a campaign direction, partially because I struggled about how to be impactful and create effective changes for the safety of cyclists. I agree with Michael, there is a risk of "rubber-necking" if we post but miss conveying a purpose or solution. Is there something we can do to help be agents of change for safer cycling?
So I encouraged Michael to express these concerns, hoping for a good, solid discussion like many of the other ones we have been having about cyclist safety, relationships with drivers, and pretty much every other recent thread. We've had some pretty thoughtful discussions. So I'm going to gently remind us all that using profanity, assuming intentions, and making harsh judgements isn't helpful and also violates our participation rules.
Can we change this thread so that we have a thoughtful, meaningful discussion about effectiveness of posting about cycling-related deaths? I will continue to post the big stories e.g. Michigan as well as the local stories e.g. Divvy. I do believe there is a value to doing so. I also recommend this - if you prefer to see positive stories and discussions, BE THE CHANGE. Sure this is corny but it's the best way I know of changing the mood - find the positive stories, ask positive questions. Didn't see enough good stuff about an awesome ride e.g. RAGBRAI? Well, post it yourself or if you couldn't attend this ride, ask others if they went as well as asking to share photos, stories, etc. And of course, do what Gene does - POST THOSE BEAUTIFUL RIDING PHOTOS! :-) We will also be posting more ride/race reports, cycling-related articles, product reviews, etc.
I don't really want to be a gatekeeper. As I try to learn more about stepping back and letting conversations take place, there is a value to the debates and discussions. As I mentioned in my post, I don't have some great, definitive answer to this because I can easily see both sides of the issue. I do ask, as posting, to think about what value your post brings. There is a value to editorializing the post - tell us why you chose to share the article. What does it mean to you? What do you think? Do you agree or disagree? Just throwing a news story up there, to Michael's point, doesn't necessarily invite the conversation you might be hoping for. I've learned in posting that articles rarely stand on their own to spark meaningful discussions.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members