There is an incredibly unsafe configuration of the left turn green light at Chicago onto Wells. At 99% of intersections in Chicago, the left turn green light happens before the actual full on green light cycle for that street. This is not the case at Chicago/wells where the green left turn light happens after straightbound traffic gets a red light!
I cant be the only cyclist who watches the light turn red the opposite direction and then start moving. Yes I was wrong for doing so but when you are riding into a 40 mph headwind and just about every other light in Chicago has the left turn light in the beginning of the cycle and not at the end, one is not expecting that. I’m sure that I’m not the first cyclist that this has Encountered this and also pedestrians crossing the street must be perplexed at this situation as well!
Tags:
Of course you must be observant and never assume when on the road.
My point is, that it would be valuable to all users of the road if there was uniformity in traffic device design which would lend to safety due to its predictability.
Conversely, though, this shows how supposed predictability breeds dangerous behavior as well. I'm just as guilty, so trust me I'm not throwing stones, but the danger happened here because a road user (in this instance the cyclist) tried to get a jump start on the light cycle based on how he thought they'd work. The rub is nothing is ever 100% predictable. Light cycles get re-timed fairly often, things malfunction, etc. In other words, the whole "predictability" point cuts both ways, as people start to naturally think they're safe to cheat the system (and in reality they're not safe to do it ever).
And for the record, I guess it depends where you ride, but these sort of "green arrow to clear intersection" scenarios aren't as uncommon as people thing, both in Chicago and in other cities. I actually think there should be more when you look at the common traffic back up scenarios people see in the loop and other areas.
There is such a uniformity, and it is codified in the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 'Uniformity' does not mean doing the same thing everywhere - different circumstances, whether of road design or traffic volume or whatever - call for different treatments to problems. In some circumstances, leading turn signals are better and in others it is the opposite.
Out of curiosity David, have you ever made a mistake in any sort of traffic because something is out of the ordinary?
Northbound on Wells. Chicago had the green turn signal after the chicago direction had a red light.
It's not horribly uncommon. The light at Halsted and Broadway does the same. I would wait out the light and watch shoalers creep out or pull into the oncoming turners and hear the horns wail. You gotta wait for your signal.
The anticipation can be as dangerous as the change from the perceived routine. On Lincoln there is a routine for which street gets the green light. As I travel on Liincoln, which runs on an angle and my light turns red, the east/west goes and then the north/south goes. However, there are two intersections where that is flipped and anticipation can be deadly at those intersections. Yes, I sometimes start to move early, but have learned to slow my roll. The good news is you survived and now know what to do the next time you are at Chicago/Wells.
I agree that the cycle is unusual and I've made the mistake of thinking that I was about to get the green at that intersection when, in fact, I was not. Sorry people are giving you a hard time in this thread, though I also see their point. As David Barish put it, the good news is, now you know. :) And as someone else recommended, you could reach out to the alderman's office--would be interesting if you received a substantive response.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members