The Chainlink

Alderman Reilly introduces measure to remove Kinzie protected bike lane

EDIT: The current proposal by Alderman Reilly (with link to PDF) is here: https://chicago.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2262355&...

EDIT 2: The original ordinance passed to approve the planned Wolf Point development.  Language about temporarily moving the PBL from Kinze to Grand, subject to review by the Chicago DOT, is at paragraph 22:

https://gisapps.cityofchicago.org/gisimages/zoning_pds/PD98.pdf

From the Sun-Times:

http://chicago.suntimes.com/chicago-politics/7/71/522067/brendan-re...

A week after helping Mayor Rahm Emanuel get re-elected, downtown Ald. Brendan Reilly (42nd) is doing battle with the mayor’s handpicked transportation commissioner over protected bike lanes on Kinzie Street.

Reilly introduced an ordinance Wednesday that seeks to compel Transportation Commissioner Rebekah Scheinfeld to remove the protected bike lane on Kinzie “as required” by the planned development governing Wolf Point.

It clearly states that the protected bike lane “must be removed” from Kinzie before a certificate of occupancy is awarded for the first building of that massive development, he said.

But, Reilly said Scheinfeld is considering using her “commissioner’s authority to ignore that directive” agreed to by her predecessor, hammered out with area residents and approved by the Chicago Plan Commission.

“The intent of this ordinance is to require her to remove it so that there’s no question it must be done,” the alderman said.

Reilly said “traffic congestion concerns” demand that the protected bike lane be removed. Reilly’s ordinance would require the city to remove the protected bike lane — along with “all associated signage, markings or barriers” — from the portion of West Kinzie Street between Dearborn and the west bank of the Chicago River.

“Kinzie is a very busy street. With the added density of some, close to 2 million square feet of occupied space on Wolf Point, there’ll be a lot more traffic. Traffic studies suggested that a bike lane should be removed to allow for proper traffic flow and safety, and the commissioner is now second-guessing that,” he said.

“Each point in this planned development was negotiated with the neighbors and other stakeholders. And when this was approved as a project, people were relying on this obligation. In effect, the commissioner’s refusal to honor the planned development and its obligation is . . . an act in bad faith when neighbors and others in the area were promised this would happen.”

Scheinfeld could not be reached for comment about Reilly’s charge or the ordinance he introduced that seeks to tie her hands. CDOT spokesman Mike Claffey had no immediate comment.

Behind the scenes, Scheinfeld has argued that CDOT did an internal study that suggests “it would not be safe to move these lanes from Kinzie to Grand Avenue,” the alderman said.

Reilly doesn’t buy that argument on grounds it was “not a professional study.”


“I have a professional consultant that was engaged by the Wolf Point developer to install bike lanes on Grand saying this would actually be safer than the Kinzie Street bike lanes that exist today,” Reilly said.

Reilly noted that “hundreds” of cyclists use Grand Avenue every day without incident. That’s why he doesn’t believe Scheinfeld’s safety argument.

The alderman said he’s a fan of protected bike lanes and they’re “prolific” throughout the 42nd Ward because he is a “strong supporter.” But, he argued that protected lanes “make sense in certain areas and in others they don’t”

“I’m telling you, we’re adding a tremendous amount of density to Wolf Point and there’s only two ways to get there: Orleans and Kinzie. So, I don’t believe the commissioner should be able to arbitrarily decide where she wants to honor planned development obligations,” he said.

Reilly’s political pull with Emanuel has never been higher.

He served as a key campaign surrogate who blasted Jesus “Chuy” Garcia’s decision to punt the question of revenues needed to solve the combined $30 billion pension crisis at the city and public schools to a post-election commission.

Has the alderman taken his case directly to the mayor?

“Not yet,” Reilly said.

“I was happy to support the mayor. I hope he can appreciate that these are obligations that were negotiated with the community when the Wolf Point project was approved,” he added. “They should be honored. My constituents deserve that.”

EDIT 3: Mark Konkol at DNAinfo weighs in: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150417/river-north/what-is-great-...

EDIT 4: Steven Vance at StreetsBlog provides thorough explanation: http://chi.streetsblog.org/2015/04/17/whats-going-on-with-alderman-...

Views: 1976

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm just going to leave this right here. Alderman Reilly doesn't seem like much of an advocate of healthy living.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-trb15ecigs-20140115-photo.html

'nuff said. That speaks volumes.

Reilly is now suggesting on Twitter that the removal would not be permanent.  That's at odds with the language he proposed.  https://twitter.com/AldReilly/status/589064465838014467

His language in the "order" is to stress that this is important and CDOT should own up to their disagreement on whether Kinzie should be removed anymore. 

My story: http://chi.streetsblog.org/2015/04/17/whats-going-on-with-alderman-...

Agreed.

I looked up a presentation that's linked to the developer's web site for the project. It's worth reading. Look carefully at the traffic access portion of the plan. Page 55 (Site Access Update) is of particular interest for the long-term traffic picture.  The primary access point is a loop off of upper Orleans opposite the Merchandise Mart driveway. This is illustrated on several pages, starting with page 13. 

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24996069/WolfPoint10-12.pdf

Developer's web site here. The traffic study link brings up nothing, at least when I tried it. Hmmm...
http://www.wolfpointchicago.com/content/projectoverview

#SaveKinzie

CMass route theme for Friday?

I'm skeptical about the route proposed for "Grand Avenue," which is a one-way street between Navy Pier and Wells. I suspect the route would follow that of busses, which turn right on Wells and follow Illinois to the Pier turnaround. Illinois is easily one of the busiest streets in Chicago at most times of day. It has far too many parking lots to accommodate a safe bike lane; right hooks, cutoffs and logjams from cars looking to park are inevitable. The dangers and pollution encountered by cyclists from busses are something we go out of our way to avoid; most cyclists can stay ahead of a bus, but being caught behind one is hellish.

I will continue to ride on Kinzie when I wish to. I recommend that all cyclists do the same, regardless of the "temporary" closure of the city's first protected lanes.

(mssg. included in my letter to Ald. Fioretti)

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service