Tags:
Walking and running barefoot is healthier for your feet, then wearing shoes. Shoes are not good for your feet, period. There have been several studies on the subject.
I think callusing of the feet might help with avoiding things on the surfaces walked/ran. But I have no evidence of this.
It was the next big thing. Now, maybe not so much...
I found this one..
http://nymag.com/health/features/46213/
Kevin C said:
It was the next big thing. Now, maybe not so much...
Two words: Arch Support.
Two more words: Plantar Faciitis.
I wouldn't wish it on anyone. It takes years to get better and often never really does. Foot pain is forever. Seriously -don't go there.
I've been running in "those barefoot things" with no arch support what-so-ever for about 4 years now. 2 marathons, a dozen half-marathons, and thousands of training miles in between. I love them. I'm not going to advocate for barefoot running or "psuedo-barefoot running" in my case, because, I think it comes down to the individual. I love my Vibrams and can hardly image running without them, they make running fun for me. I tried complete barefoot running and it ended in disaster (blisters the size of quarters) - Vibrams are a nice in-between. But for others, it may not work and that's fine too. I think the fact that people are running is a good thing, regardless of footwear. Vibrams have their limits...it's fine here in the city with pavement, but once you get on trails with big rocks, forget about it - I've tried trail running a couple times in them and it ended with deep bruises in the balls of my feet each time. I try to ignore most of the Pro-shoe/Pro-barefoot conversations as their really is no winning them...it's like politics.
Whenever I ride or walk down the LFP I look at all the nice boats in the harbors. Those things are expensive as heck. I wonder how many of them are owned by podiatrists? They seem to have plenty of patients...
;)
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members