OK, this is student journalism from Medill, so do NOT use normal standards in critiquing the content of this piece, "Bicyclists, cars, pedestrians are an uneasy mix"

I found it interesting to watch the five short accompanying video clips, used to illustrate that bicyclists do not follow the rules of the road. In each case, the shot is too tight to see the entire intersection, so critical information is missing like whether it's a one-way cross street a T-intersection (which is the case in three of the videos). Perhaps the author doesn't ride a bicycle very much herself; she seems to feel that a cyclist needs to visibly wag her head left to right in order to view the whole intersection and prove she's following the law.

In any case, I'm surprised the author couldn't get footage of more egregious behavior, as these clips are pretty tame. For example, it's true that the cyclist in the third video at Clark and LaSalle should not be blocking the crosswalk (although a mitigating factor is there are no pedestrians present); but he is rightfully in front of all the cars (the author seems to imply he should be behind the stop line for vehicles?) and he has to be given credit for stopping at the red light, proceeding with green, and most impressively balancing on his bike for at least 20 seconds!

Views: 1257

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I posted the Salon article on my FB page and Anne Alt mentioned the lack of effort to improver bike infrastructure on the South and West Sides. It looks like London is having the same problem according to This Big City: In addition to its limited geographical distribution, London’s cycle hire scheme has been criticised for failing to attract a broad range of users.

@Liz - I TOTALLY agree!  Besides, the increased brightness, improved battery life, and decreasing cost of lights removes most excuses for getting lit!

+1

 


Liz said:

I honestly wish that police would start ticketing cyclists who ride after dark without lights and cyclists who run red lights.  They're behaviors that are dangerous not just to those riders but to others.

With speeding and red light cameras Chicago is cracking down on motorists who violate the law, it would make sense that the increase in ticketing for violations apply to cyclists as well. It could help end the side of the "anti cycling" debate that cyclists who break the law face no consequences. 


 

Would you support increased ticketing for Jay-walking as well? (if enforceable) This includes crossing a street when there's a red light, regardless of whether there's oncoming traffic or not.

I ask this because in many ways, I see a biker as a hybrid between a pedestrian and a motorized vehicle.

Liz said:

I honestly wish that police would start ticketing cyclists who ride after dark without lights and cyclists who run red lights.  They're behaviors that are dangerous not just to those riders but to others.

With speeding and red light cameras Chicago is cracking down on motorists who violate the law, it would make sense that the increase in ticketing for violations apply to cyclists as well. It could help end the side of the "anti cycling" debate that cyclists who break the law face no consequences. 

yes I do think morepedestrians should get tickets for jaywalking. I see many downtown that cross regardless of on comong traffic. 

Regardless of your opinion on howto classify cyclists there is no reason to run a red light with traffic present and cyclists should be ticketed for it.

MagMileMarauder said:

Would you support increased ticketing for Jay-walking as well? (if enforceable) This includes crossing a street when there's a red light, regardless of whether there's oncoming traffic or not.

I ask this because in many ways, I see a biker as a hybrid between a pedestrian and a motorized vehicle.

Liz said:

I honestly wish that police would start ticketing cyclists who ride after dark without lights and cyclists who run red lights.  They're behaviors that are dangerous not just to those riders but to others.

With speeding and red light cameras Chicago is cracking down on motorists who violate the law, it would make sense that the increase in ticketing for violations apply to cyclists as well. It could help end the side of the "anti cycling" debate that cyclists who break the law face no consequences. 

fixt:



James BlackHeron said:

Own Goal!

The damage is done.

Bikes are not cars.  Laws made for cars are not appropriate for bikes. 

Amen Brother J, missed your posts around here. Good to see you back!

James BlackHeron said:

The damage is done.

Bikes are not cars.  Laws made for cars are not appropriate for bikes. 

+1 on that.

Human beings lack of imagination never ceases to amaze me.  

James BlackHeron said:

The damage is done.

Bikes are not cars.  Laws made for cars are not appropriate for bikes. 

Excellent, h'!  If it has that tag line, I want one of these.  I don't have a car to put it on, but I'll gladly wear it around my neck on a bling chain, Flava Flav style.
 
h' said:

You should replace the cyclist in the plate with one where it's much more evident that he's wearing lyrca.  Also, make him resemble lance armstrong a bit more.  Since you know, all cyclists wear lyrca and Lance is the only cyclist of note.

h' said:

Any requests before I close P-shop?

Perhaps a little John Pike pepper-spray action?



h' said:

Any requests before I close P-shop?

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service