Thanks to the Lombard based Avgeris and Associates real estate development firm, the 100+ year old W.M. Wrigley Candy factory @ 35th and Ashland will be demolished to make way for a strip mall and big box store, with plenty of parking!
This is forward thinking at its finest. The developer cites that the neighborhood is becoming increasingly attractive to young professionals, and they need more retail.
I'm not opposed to more retail, but do we need the acres of parking? How about some adaptive reuse?
Here is a story on DNA info about the new development.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130210/mckinley-park/old-wrigley-g...
and if you can't get the slideshow to work, here is a direct link to the site plan.
http://assets.dnainfo.com/generated/chicago_photo/2013/02/site-plan...
You have Ashland on the left, & 35th on the top. Little boxes surrounded by acres of parking lot.
If you have an opinion about this development, please share it with the folks with the plan.
Let them know what forward thinking young professionals in the city think of suburban style development.
You can find their email address on their website (& a picture of their corporate headquarters surrounded by parking lot!)
http://www.avgerisinc.com/team.php
Tags:
yuck, what an atrocious site plan.
i wish i had been born on the bicycle planet, because the automobile planet sucks, and it only seems to be getting suckier. why hath thou forsaken me, lord?
oh, i get it now, i must have messed up royally during my previous life on the bicycle planet and this place is just hell.
I worked there in the 80s, what a magnificent place it was.
Sorry to see it turned over to "developers" who will just spread their special form of thoughtless/ugly/sprawling/cancerous/mediocrity. They will probably make a crapload of money.
I can certainly see both sides of the argument.
While it is very sad to see a historic building like this razed, McKinley Park and Bridgeport need some sort of commerce. I used to live at 31st & Canal and can very much remember not having as many options as I do on the north side for shopping/eating/etc.
As much as I like what they've done with the building Zhou B Art Center is in, and the Bridgeport Art Center (also mentioned in the article,) those are not huge income generators. I'm sure alderman Balcer is probably frothing at the mouth thinking about the potential money that this plan could generate.
Jim, you make a good point, but economically useful development does not have to adhere to the model of a building surrounded by an ocean of parking lots; streetside buildings with parking (decks) behind can yield the same, or greater benefits (albeit at slightly greater cost, which is probably why we're not going to see it here) with better pedestrian-friendliness.
And you're totally right, for sure. Case in point, to some extent, would be my local Andersonville Jewel Osco. Between the store and the bank right next to it, there is a sea of parking spaces in a sprawling lot. I think it's probably exacerbated due to the fact that it's smack dab in the middle of an extremely walkable neighborhood.
I know Daniel's comment is tongue-in-cheek, but I sometimes get the feeling that a lot of the south siders might prefer low density development. People seem to flock to Riverside Square @ Ashland and Archer.
It looks like we have an illegal demolition going on as we speak.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members