The Chainlink

Showing Up: Fight the Internet for the Soul of Critical Mass!

After holding out I finally joined The Chainlink last week (I'm a Facebook & Twitter avoider too).  Yeah!  I get an email about events this week.  Yeah!!  After a bad run-in with a car yesterday, I decide to cheer myself up by going to Wicker Park Critical Mass. Yeah!!!

...only to find a 20+ strong crowd of mostly hipsters (and Chopper Carl), the vast majority of whom:
  • heard about the ride from the Chainlink
  • have never been on a Critical Mass
These kids are standing around waiting, no, begging for someone to follow.  I make an impromptu map and we set off 40 minutes late... and it's clear from the start this is not a usual Mass.  No cohesion, no corking, no sense of direction, no parade pace (Carl's buddy with a sound system bike could barely keep up).  And then one kid yells "Let's stop at the grocery store!" and 3/4 of the ride follows him across oncoming traffic and then sits confusedly in a parking lot.  After we get going again, I decide leading is too much work and slip in at the very back of the ride... only to find that folks thought they were following me.  I bailed a few blocks later.

This was not a Critical Mass - it was clueless mob.

I don't blame the kids involved (how could they know any better?  they've never done this before) but the the veteran riders who promoted WPCM and didn't show up.  Last night, The Chainlink showed me that we have an amazing tool for recruiting and organizing - but when we plan events like this and then don't follow through, we put our culture at risk. 

You can't ride your bike on the Internet.  As Alex said: "If you don't show up, you don't get to vote. If you don't vote, you don't get to complain."  Drivers and pedestrians and the public are not on this site - the righteous fury of our keyboards and screens is not going to get us more bike lanes or reduce dooring or show the world how much fun they could have.

Unplug, people.  Your bike misses you.

Views: 411

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

First off, I'm sorry if I ever gave the impression that I was "the leader" of WPCM. We all have different priorities, and for better or worse, WPCM isn't a huge priority for me at this time. I also didn't post the March ride to the Chainlink.

As for CM being "a mob," no, I think that many of us see CM as an experiment in anarchy -- it's not that there are no leaders, it's that everyone's a leader. I know that CM empowered me to become a leader, and it's a shame that others don't see that same opportunity.
payton said:
First off, I'm sorry if I ever gave the impression that I was "the leader" of WPCM. We all have different priorities, and for better or worse, WPCM isn't a huge priority for me at this time. I also didn't post the March ride to the Chainlink.

No, I didn't think you were in charge, but your name was on the event. Yeah, I know... its the Internets.


As for CM being "a mob," no, I think that many of us see CM as an experiment in anarchy -- it's not that there are no leaders, it's that everyone's a leader. I know that CM empowered me to become a leader, and it's a shame that others don't see that same opportunity.

Yeah, that's the first half of my point... the second half is that folks are never going to learn the difference between mob and Mass, between chaos and anarchy, if we wiley old comrades don't show up to explain it... remember, 3/4 of this ride was people who'd never been to a Mass before.

On that note, I think a flyer on these topics is in order for the next Daley Plaza ride... I'll link here once I've made one (or make your own, damnit!)
;-)

I'm proud of my sore butt.

caitlin eleanor field said:
:)

notoriousDUG said:
This thread has been brought to you buy 'taking things to seriously' and 'sore butts,' thank you and good night.
Sheeze.
After reading this thread, Pete, it sounds like your beef with March's WPCM was that no one had any ideas in mind at all. From what's been written, I gather that there was no destination in mind, much less a route to a destination.

I can see why that would be frustrating.

Did anyone talk about route ideas or final destinations before you all set off? That question is directed at anyone who was there, by the way.
And/or, if we're talking to the people who actually attended the ride-- did you have a good time regardless?
I think this notion that a CM ride needs to have a 'destination' and any sort of planned route is the problem, not the solution.
Payton nailed it when he said "everyone leads."
I think the source of the frustration (begin "kids these days" rant) is that there was no acceptance of responsibility for the event on the part of any of the attendees besides himself.
I still don't know what it is you want to happen, Pete.

Tank-Ridin' Ryan said:
After reading this thread, Pete, it sounds like your beef with March's WPCM was that no one had any ideas in mind at all. From what's been written, I gather that there was no destination in mind, much less a route to a destination.

I can see why that would be frustrating.

Did anyone talk about route ideas or final destinations before you all set off? That question is directed at anyone who was there, by the way.
I saw the aimless mob riding on Kedzie when I got off the el at Logan Square. Looked like fun.
Payton
You can't have it both ways. If you want others to take a turn at leader then step down out of the way.
CM does not need any absentee leaders. Take your name off the event.



payton said:
First off, I'm sorry if I ever gave the impression that I was "the leader" of WPCM. We all have different priorities, and for better or worse, WPCM isn't a huge priority for me at this time. I also didn't post the March ride to the Chainlink.

As for CM being "a mob," no, I think that many of us see CM as an experiment in anarchy -- it's not that there are no leaders, it's that everyone's a leader. I know that CM empowered me to become a leader, and it's a shame that others don't see that same opportunity.
I too share part of pete's frustration but have different reasoning behind my frustration.
Sure there was no one ‘in charge’ of the mass, but we all ended up on our bikes and riding and having a good time, which was the point of it. My problem lies with the lack of communication and awareness of surroundings.
I too was pissed (although thought it was funny) that we went to a grocery store parking lot for no reason. I was not pissed because of the stop but because of how the stop happened. No one communicated, the mass got split and those who did go into the lot immediately cut from the far right lane across 3 lanes of traffic on a very busy street. I think part of the reason that this happens is that everyone feels safe in numbers. But just because you’re with 20 other people does not mean you won’t be hit by a car. It is never ok to cut off traffic just because the person in front of you did it. Secondly there were multiple points where we were taking up 2 lanes when cars were trying to pass. There were less than 30 of us and there was no reason why we could not be in one lane, at that when we were on smaller streets we could have made room for cars to pass was well. I am sick of yelling ‘car back’ just to have people think that it means take up the whole road and don’t let them pass. To be respected you have to respect others not piss them off. I had this same frustration last week on a ride as well. Forcing cars to pull into the lane for oncoming traffic so they can speed by us is unsafe not only for the cars but also for the cyclists involved. These problems have nothing to do with not having a leader but with people not knowing how to ride in groups, which I guess (hope) happens with time and experience. Communication is key in these rides and I agree that it was surely missing last night.
And this said man who tried to molest Gabe, well I paid him to do it, and want my money back because he obviously failed. Turtle races again next Friday anyone? (and no I am not volunteering to 'lead' this event, and will most likely not show up)
Love you Dug!! Love you Caitlin! I was there and it was a lot of fun! No corking was necessary cause we were to small and corking for fun is a BAD IDEA!!! If we were going to fast for the sound trailer HE needed to speak up not you cause I thought we were rolling at a decent pace cause I'm the first to say when we're goin to fast!

Your argument blows and we ended up at a bar with turtle races and havin' MORE fun! For Critical Mass you have to go with the flow or you end up complaining cause it didn't turn out the way you like. Tough luck! Every Mass I've been on has a different feel and has a different story through out.

And turtles can't race for shit! ;-)
"I bailed a few blocks later."

If Critical Mass means something that particular to you and you think the "hipsters" need to know about it, it was YOUR responsibility to show them the error of their ways. Pete, you failed. I bet Alex would agree with me.

Q: Who is the leader of Critical Mass?

A: YOU are the leader of Critical Mass.
Pete's observations have merit. I've had a similar impression of WPCM the last few times I've gone. I've been less heroic than Pete. Trying to single handedly guide such a ride without planning is a tall order. Herding cats isn't easy.

I haven't felt the urge to complain about WPCM cause I haven't cared enough about the ride to put even that much effort into it. And complaining without the will to significantly contribute is kind of pointless.

I like the NSCM. It has a core group that pours sweat into routes and themes. The ride usually gets going on schedule and for the most part the ride has a safe, comfortable, friendly feel which appeals to me in my doddering old age. It fulfills my urge for a monthly neighborhood mass up.

I don't think the 'net is keeping people off their bikes and away from the WPCM. If there isn't already a forum devoted to WPCM, creating one would be a good first step toward facilitating more planning, organizing and perhaps interest in the ride. I'm not currently up for putting much effort into WPCM as I've got as many commitments as I can handle. However, if Pete or someone else instigated I'd try and give a little support.
T.C. O'Rourke said:
"I bailed a few blocks later."

If Critical Mass means something that particular to you and you think the "hipsters" need to know about it, it was YOUR responsibility to show them the error of their ways. Pete, you failed. I bet Alex would agree with me.

Yup, I tried & I failed. I rode around with the ride for about 45 minutes and talked to several people about what I felt was going on. How long should I have kept at it? I've already been called a sore butt once on this thread... ;-)

I've been comparing what happened here to the fights that used to occur on the mailing list - "Critical Mass is not this list, it's the ride". What's different here is that last night's ride occurred because of the Net, rather than regardless of it. Again, 3/4 of the folks had never been on a Mass before.

Interestingly, I've seen this exact thing happen before, at Brooklyn's CM (2008). Time's UP! promoted the ride to their lists and then didn't show. Pretty typical I was told. That Mass also had mostly new folks, and the one 'veteran' (2 prior rides) agreed with the cops to keep the ride on a greenway. That's not what I call a Critical Mass. And, FWIW, I told the assembled folks as much and bailed before they even got going. Sometimes the best way to ride Critical Mass is not to ride at all.

Q: Who is the leader of Critical Mass?

A: YOU are the leader of Critical Mass.

Me? Officer, you must be joking, I was just riding along and all these bikes started following me. ;-)

When we say we're leaderless, we mean we have no leaders when viewed from without and as many leaders as riders when viewed from within. Anarchy outside, allarchy inside perhaps? Not last night. Maybe next month. Will I be there? I dunno. But if I flyer for it, or post about it or tell my friends, I damn well better be.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service