|
|||||||
https://ebmedia.eventbrite.com/s3-s3/marketing/emails/invites/botto..." alt="eventbrite" width="560" height="9"/> |
Tags:
Drat, Thursday is the day everybody has picked for meetings.... I will miss the Trail meeting because I'll be downtown planning for the Sept 21st Peoples Climate March in NYC. Also will miss the meeting down in Pullman District for getting National Park Status for the District which could go far to help illuminate the conditions that lead to the Chicago Labor movement and the killings by the military at stikes and labor rallys.
If anybody qestions what 'local' residents believe I am in favor of extending the trail to Foster and Kilbourn tho I haven't seen the route yet. I live in the 5800 blockl of Peterson.
I wonder if the anti-bike zealots from the Milwaukee Ave meetings will attend, tho from the drivers license that one 'mouth' was waving around it might be to far to cross the street for him.
Was at the meeting as was Bob and Brian.
Cheers for Brian when he said, "build this thing" already. (Words to that effect.)
There were a lot of people in favor of it who live in and around the area. Even the Old Edgebrook folks weren't as much against the trail as I expected but wanted it to go on their streets through the neighborhood or cross Central with a bridge or somewhere else. I can understand their issue: they live in the middle of gridlock where they can't get in or out across Central because of pissed-off motorists.
I was considering pointing out that their problems are not going to be made worse by the bike trail but the point was made by others.
In fairness to them, the crossing at Central is going to be a grade-level, push-button and wait for the light to change. This type of light exists at Touhy and I don't recall ever being stopped by it as a motorist and only rarely needing it to cross Touhy as a biker.
A bridge over Central would be better but nearly impossible due to cost and not having enough room for the approaches. The Edgebrookers kept up a constant request for looking at alternatives which the FP promised to address privately but it is clear this project is going forward.
I'm not clear on one point: how is this thing going to cross Devon? Map doesn't say.
The FP has posted this information page:
http://fpdcc.com/preserves-and-trails/plans-and-projects/north-bran...
A better map is now available online here:
http://fpdcc.com/downloads/NorthBranchTrailSouthExtension-8-13-14.pdf
One other valid concern was the number of trees that will be taken out with the FP saying it's 400 and many of those being dead or Buckthorn. The residents said their FOIA request return showed 5,000. I still say I prefer biker lives over trees, as much as I love trees (and I love them more than some bikers). The FP said that the 5,000 number was inches of trees not actual trees.
I am sorry I missed it, but glad it is still going forward.
It is funny because most of the trail they are proposing is dirt BMX trails and such I rode back when I was younger, so I would imagine that they are closer to the 400 trees versus 5000 since those paths are wide enough to squeeze cars and Jeeps down them (I have seen enough burnt out cars in the woods or the river back there).
Plus that section of Central is a fricking RACE TRACK all the time. I hate riding down there unless I have to.....which is very rarely.
THroughout the forest preserve system, there are thousands and thousands of dead or dying ash trees. I suspect that's a large percentage of what was mentioned as dead trees. Buckthorn is a huge problem for the health of our forests. Getting rid of it in order to create a healthier ecosystem with more native species is a GOOD thing. Just my $0.02 from a TreeKeeper perspective.
Tominator said:
I couldn't make it but my wife did. She texted me 'I smell NIMBYism approaching,' and left around 7 when the real crazies started. 'How many trees will be murdered!?!' and so on. I've been at similar meetings, to do with the reconstruction of the riverbank at Horner Park. There are people who have things near their house just the way they like it and feel that gives them the right to dictate what happens outside their property lines. And they should have some say, that's why there are zoning laws. But something like this, which will benefit lots of people (and the NBT is heavily used), obviously takes precedence.
I was expecting pure NIMBY but was pleasantly surprised that there was very little of that. Also, I thought the FP handled it pretty well. They'll give the community as much input as they want but it's clear that it's going forward in its present configuration.
Any future meetings planned that are known already?
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members