I was hot by an uninsured motorist about 2 months ago, where I have had minor (but possible long term) medical bills, and about $500 worth of damage to my bike. I went to the court date, sans lawyer, and the guy that hit me had a lawyer. Once my case was called, it was IMMEDIATELY moved up to personal injury court, where we sat for a looonnng time to be called. Once called, the lawyer said he wanted a continuance because he didn't have any more time to deal with this that day, and wanted an order to have me excused from the next court date. Someone from the court spoke to me after this, took my info, and said I am not going to the next court date. When I asked if that is going to hurt me in anyway, she said "No, the judge saw you here today, and knows you are interested in this case." Does this sound like something I need to obtain a lawyer for? I know my auto insurance will cover me for the medical bills (which, through my own insurance, hasn't been that costly), but not for damage to my bike. Is it worth going after this guy to settle? I'm broke as it is, and don't want to end up in the hole with lawyer fees, but if I'm going to get screwed without one...
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
"Someone from the court" could have been someone from the motorist's side. Contact your insurance company - they have a vested interest in this case - and ask them what to do: lawyer, back to the other court, etc. I am not an attorney - although I play one on TV - but it sounds like someone was trying to take advantage of you. If it was no big deal, why did the motorist pay for an attorney to show up in court? There are lawyers that specialize in bike cases, like the one advertising on the right hand side of this page. Go get 'em, Tiffany.
I would get an attorney. They take these cases on contingency - meaning they get paid when you win and it comes from the settlement. I found the 30% I paid my attorney well worth having him and his amazing staff handle the hassle of insurance companies.
If it involved court, there is NO CHANCE I would go in without an attorney who specializes in bicycle crashes. Call the Active Trans Crash Hotline for referrals.
we also have two lawyers who advertise here on the c-link, I have met Brendan Kevenides and I can tell you he will be glad to advise you of your options.
Yep, I'd be happy to talk to you any time Tiffany. 312.803.0128.
Michael A said:
we also have two lawyers who advertise here on the c-link, I have met Brendan Kevenides and I can tell you he will be glad to advise you of your options.
Call an attorney; never go to court without one even for what seems like a simple matter. Not only others, but the system itself, will trample your rights otherwise.
Most importantly, do not skip a court date unless and until you have a lawyer representing you. You may risk having your case dismissed if you do not show up. Someone was either uninformed or trying to mislead you.
+1
Cheryl said:
Most importantly, do not skip a court date unless and until you have a lawyer representing you. You may risk having your case dismissed if you do not show up. Someone was either uninformed or trying to mislead you.
So this motorist cant afford insurance but can afford to lawyer up. Seems like a class act.
+1. smells fishy to me.
and the part about : "Someone from the court spoke to me after this, took my info, and said I am not going to the next court date. When I asked if that is going to hurt me in anyway, she said "No, the judge saw you here today, and knows you are interested in this case.""
seems EXTREMELY suspiscious.
I would follow all the above advice and keep us posted, thanks
Davo said:
So this motorist cant afford insurance but can afford to lawyer up. Seems like a class act.
It depends on the Court. I assume that this was "criminal" Court for charges against the motorist. In such case, the States Attorney would talk to our victim as a potential witness. And if the next Court date is a status call, the witness would not be needed. One approach which is often used by (less than forthright) Defense Lawyers is to try to continue the case three or four times in order to frustrate the witnesses so that they quit taking time off to come down to the Court to be witnesses and then the case gets dismissed. As for him not having insurance, but having a lawyer, that's not that uncommon. The insurance is for civil liability... and if he is judgment proof (ie broke with no assets) he may well not have insurance. On the other hand, if the driver is facing criminal charges, he will either hire a lawyer, or under certain circumstances, have one appointed.
Remember, YOU do not recover in a criminal case. That's the civil case and that's where you need to talk to a good bicycle lawyer. And some of them will take the case on a contingent fee basis. And just about all of them will give you a free consultation to discuss whether the case is worth pursuing.
Its not, per se, fishy. It depends on who talked to our victim. If it was a States Attorney, someone who has the incentive to see the driver punished, appearance at the next court date is not required because no trial is contemplated. The Judge does note the appearance of the witnesses because, if a witness shows up several times and the Defendant gets continuance after continuance and then the witness does not show up and the Defendant is "magically" ready for trial that day, the Judge will often still continue the case. If the witness does not show up from the onset, the Judge is far more likely to simply throw the case out.
If it was the attorney for the Defendant, that's a major no-no, and I would strongly suspect that this is not the case.
Thanks for all of the feedback! Brendan has been a great resource - nice to finally know that there are lawyers out there that get the cycling community.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members