Jason Jenkins at ActiveTrans is helping to coordinate community response. If there is any chance you can attend proceedings, please reach out to him:
jason@activetrans.org.
Tags:
The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer
http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...
Another posting on the subject.
It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.
Yeah, this blog update just arrived by carrier pigeon...
Bob Kastigar said:
The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer
http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...
Another posting on the subject.
It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.
h' 1.0 said:
What is the relevance of this old blog post with no updates to Crazy David Furlong's question?
What was the question, I can't seem to find it mousing back thru the list.
Are you OK, Bob?
I'm fine, thank you for asking.
Any information on the court appearance on Monday, 10/7 at 10 AM?
Was there a court appearance?
What was brought up?
What was decided by Judge Hooks?
Is there a future court date scheduled?
Bob. If you have such an immediate need for updates regarding the progress of this judicial proceeding, why don't you show up for these court dates?
Bob Kastigar said:
Any information on the court appearance on Monday, 10/7 at 10 AM?
Was there a court appearance?
What was brought up?
What was decided by Judge Hooks?
Is there a future court date scheduled?
Also the picture at the top of the page looks a little blurry. Kind of ironic for a dui lawyer.
Kevin C said:
Yeah, this blog update just arrived by carrier pigeon...
Bob Kastigar said:The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer
http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...
Another posting on the subject.
It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.
Kevin C said:Bob. If you have such an immediate need for updates regarding the progress of this judicial proceeding, why don't you show up for these court dates?
Thank you for your very useful response and update information. You were being very helpful.
I'm sure there are other users such as me looking for information that other would like to share, since many or most of us following this are unable to attend the court proceeding due to other things to do in our lives.
Just because we don't show up doesn't mean we aren't interested in Ryne Sanhamel, while allegedly driving drunk with an alleged Blood-Alcohol level of .127 allegedly drove into and allegedly killed cyclist Bobby Cann.
Sarah D. 1-3.3 said:
+1 jesus god
You, too, are supplying very useful information and a most appropriate comment.
You must be happy to be in the inner group.
Bob, the snarky comments likely are more in response to your tone than in response to your actual requests for information. You are coming across as somewhat entitled.
I was just asking questions, and trying to encourage discussion.
Alex Z said:
Bob, the snarky comments likely are more in response to your tone than in response to your actual requests for information. You are coming across as somewhat entitled.
The beauty of an open, minimally-moderated forum is that you are free to ask questions, and any of the 9500 or so other members of the forum are free to comment.
Regardless of what Morgan may believe, there are many on this forum who are very interested in the outcome of this trial, if and when that ever occurs. At the trial, evidence will be presented in the form of occurrence and/or expert testimony, physical objects, records, documents, and the judge or jury presiding will determine whether or not Mr. Sanhamel is guilty of the offense(s) with which he has been charged. Until that time, and except in the case of an evidentiary hearing, the court proceedings will be thin on factual information. Absent factual information, real evidence, if you will, any "discussion" on the chainlink is likely to consist of speculation and conjecture.
Is there anyone on this forum, or anywhere else for that matter, who thinks that it's OK for someone to operate a motor vehicle while legally drunk, drive in a reckless manner and cause the death of another person? Not likely. Is there sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Sanhamel behaved in that fashion and caused the death of Bobby Cann? That is precisely what a trial will determine.
Talk amongst yourselves.
Bob Kastigar said:
I was just asking questions, and trying to encourage discussion.
Alex Z said:Bob, the snarky comments likely are more in response to your tone than in response to your actual requests for information. You are coming across as somewhat entitled.
The hearing took place on Monday, the next court date is November 8th I believe. No major developments. That is all the info I have at this time as I was unable to attend due to a family emergency out of town.
Jason Jenkins
Crash Support Programs Manager
Active Trans
Morgan 6 mi said:
Jason,
Any updates from the hearing on the 7th? I am interested as well.
Thanks,
Morgan
P.S. Sarah and Kevin, no need to reply. As a concerned bike commuter I am very interested in the outcome of this trial.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members