Wider Tires Roll Faster

I'm wondering what opinionated Chainlinkers make of this study:

http://janheine.wordpress.com/2012/06/13/bicycle-quarterly-performa...

Views: 1418

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lanterne Rouge on June 13, 2012 at 1:05pm

Science! How does it work?!

Wider tires are much more comfortable. I am reminded of that when I ride my hybrid with 32mm tires. 

I will agree with this much: wider tires roll faster than skinnier tires *at the same pressure*.

naturally a 32mm tire will roll faster than a 23mm tire with both at 85 psi. 

It's a good thing I don't care about speed one bit. 

Permalink Reply by Michael A on June 13, 2012 at 3:47pm

All this aside, the Giro (second largest bike race in the world) came down to the time trial and was won by a mere 30 seconds, every single rider in the top 20 used 19-21 mm wide tires. These are the men who race and ride at the top limits of human power, not some dude in a wind tunnel or in front of a computer.

Permalink Reply by ilter on June 13, 2012 at 3:47pm

Haha, Jan Heine finally made it to the Chainlink :)

In comments section, he gives an explanation as to why.. he says deformation is less w/ wider tire because the contact patch is shorter, assuming same pressure.

I also remember reading (either in this same blog or his Bicycle Quarterly magazine) that skinny tires at very high pressures cause energy loss in rough pavement, as they transfer road vibration/bumps to vertical movement, whereas thicker tires absorb more & not transfer it to the bike & rider.. something in those lines..

Edit: I realize I mostly rephrased what Jeff already said above. oh well :)

Permalink Reply by ilter on June 13, 2012 at 4:02pm

Did you read the details ? I think this dude is different & may convert you too :)

Michael A said:

All this aside, the Giro (second largest bike race in the world) came down to the time trial and was won by a mere 30 seconds, every single rider in the top 20 used 19-21 mm wide tires. These are the men who race and ride at the top limits of human power, not some dude in a wind tunnel or in front of a computer.

Permalink Reply by Michael A on June 13, 2012 at 4:08pm

I have been cycling a long, long, time When I started racing there were only tubulars, we would train on 21mm tires and race on 18-19 mm.  I now train and race on both tubular and clincher 21-23 mm tires. I commute on 28mm high perf tires on my cross bike. With the right tubular tire you and the right pressure you get unmatched comfort and performance.

Permalink Reply by ilter on June 13, 2012 at 4:23pm

I see. Which type of tire do racers use these days ?  I think JanHeine`s research is all clinchers.

Michael A said:

I have been cycling a long, long, time When I started racing there were only tubulars, we would train on 21mm tires and race on 18-19 mm.  I now train and race on both tubular and clincher 21-23 mm tires. I commute on 28mm high perf tires on my cross bike. With the right tubular tire you and the right pressure you get unmatched comfort and performance.

Permalink Reply by Allen Wrench on June 13, 2012 at 5:38pm

I don't care how fast my tires are up to a certain point, so grain of salt. But it's fun to see Jan Heine's nerdy article cited here...  He rode on a rumble strip with an ergometer hooked to the bike.

There was a companion piece to this if I remember right saying that "low" pressures like 85 psi roll faster than the common 120 psi or so as soon as there is any bumpiness in the road (and almost the same if the road is smooth). The argument for that was, as Ilter noted, that the thing that has to move when you hit a bump is the entire bike and rider, for the high pressure tires, or for the lower pressure tires it's only the little piece of rubber in the contact area. Additionally, the movement of the tire rubber in the latter case is more elastic since it's sprung by the air inside, and you get most of the energy back out again. If I recall right, the narrow tires don't do as well at that elastic thing since they hold less air. The floppier sidewalls convert less springy energy to heat than thick ones do so they're supposed to be better too, though I seem to remember that didn't make as much difference.

If you think high pressure tires are most efficient why not take it to an extreme and get solid rubber wheels?

Remember Jan Heine is a fan of randonneur biking, not criterion road racing, so maybe he's not without bias. 

Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on June 14, 2012 at 1:02am

Skinny tires and skinny jeans are hip.  If you don't conform you are not cool.

Permalink Reply by Duppie on June 14, 2012 at 2:22am

Nice article. but rather meaningless for the majority of bicyclists because it completely ignores real-life considerations like: comfort, durability, puncture resistance, availability and most importantly: price.

It's like testing a bunch of race cars and proving that a certain design element really improves acceleration. Moot point if your are have to transport a family of four.

Permalink Reply by Kevin Mulcky on June 14, 2012 at 3:47am

Anyone see the article in print? I'm more interested in 30mm vs. 25mm than 23mm x 25mm.

Permalink Reply by Casey Carnes on June 14, 2012 at 6:34am

More interesting data up on Jan Heine's site today about tire size and impact on speed.  I think one of the more interesting points is that tire pressure, above an acceptable level, has little impact on speed.  I started following this chart and get a much more comfortable ride with little to no impact on performance.

http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 

Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on June 14, 2012 at 7:18am

Casey, do you have access to a larger version of that chart so it isn't all fuzzy when you blow it up?  I can barely read it after ning resized it. I'd love to print it out for my shop.

RSS

Groups

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service