WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by spencewine on October 9, 2012 at 10:38pm

http://www.thechainlink.org/forum/topic/search?q=license+require&am...

Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on October 10, 2012 at 6:23am

If you want to kill cycling then tax it.   That's what this attempt is, plain and simple.

How about a $5-10/gallon gas tax instead?   $20?  $50?  $100?  Going once, going twice...

Permalink Reply by Amber on October 10, 2012 at 7:18am

Thank you!!!

spencewine said:

http://www.thechainlink.org/forum/topic/search?q=license+require&am...

Permalink Reply by Amber on October 10, 2012 at 7:19am

I totally agree. This guy ticked me off.

James BlackHeron said:

If you want to kill cycling then tax it.   That's what this attempt is, plain and simple.

How about a $5-10/gallon gas tax instead?   $20?  $50?  $100?  Going once, going twice...

Permalink Reply by Amber on October 10, 2012 at 9:18am

Ha! No! I was reading the article but really wanted to see some of the views from other readings and thought that commenter's view was interested because quite a few agreed with him.

Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on October 10, 2012 at 11:35am

What Daniel is trying to say is that many of us have learned to shield ourselves from news site comments sections because they're typically so horrible...  it's a tough call because ignoring them and not participating means the balance of opinion will be tipped against you by that much more, and by participating you usually reward a news entity with additional traffic for posting an ill-intended sensationalistic piece.

Amber Charles said:

Ha! No! I was reading the article but really wanted to see some of the views from other readings and thought that commenter's view was interested because quite a few agreed with him.

Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on October 10, 2012 at 11:52am

+1

h' said:

What Daniel is trying to say is that many of us have learned to shield ourselves from news site comments sections because they're typically so horrible...  it's a tough call because ignoring them and not participating means the balance of opinion will be tipped against you by that much more, and by participating you usually reward a news entity with additional traffic for posting an ill-intended sensationalistic piece.