Streetcleaning: double edged sword for cyclists...
who own motor vehicles.
What I dislike about streetcleaning, like many other city services, is its guise. Yes, it's a necessary service, especially for cyclists. It's this very sweeping of debris that keeps us from getting more frequent flats. It seems we get screwed more often though. Well at least those of us who own motor vehicles, since we tend to drive less and often park on the street.
I have come to terms with the fact that streetcleaning is a means to acquire revenue for the city. Yes they are doing a service, but they are also counting on motorists not moving their vehicles so that they can collect revenue. If everyone moved their vehicles accordingly, I am sure the mayor would be fairly upset. It's this opportunistic behavior I hate, yes hate! Kind of like that guy in the earlier thread. The one about the abandoned bike...you know he didn't want the owner to claim the bike, so he could take it as his own.
So as I stare out my window and look at that bright orange ticket splattered on my windshield, I am upset. So much so that I gave myself a headache. Not at having to pay, but at having forgotten to move my car yet again. I feel like the guy from memento, hopefully I wont get run down by a (insert mode of transportation here) as I am wandering on the (insert location here) aimlessly in a senile stupor one day. rant over.
What I dislike about streetcleaning, like many other city services, is its guise. Yes, it's a necessary service, especially for cyclists. It's this very sweeping of debris that keeps us from getting more frequent flats. It seems we get screwed more often though. Well at least those of us who own motor vehicles, since we tend to drive less and often park on the street.
I have come to terms with the fact that streetcleaning is a means to acquire revenue for the city. Yes they are doing a service, but they are also counting on motorists not moving their vehicles so that they can collect revenue. If everyone moved their vehicles accordingly, I am sure the mayor would be fairly upset. It's this opportunistic behavior I hate, yes hate! Kind of like that guy in the earlier thread. The one about the abandoned bike...you know he didn't want the owner to claim the bike, so he could take it as his own.
So as I stare out my window and look at that bright orange ticket splattered on my windshield, I am upset. So much so that I gave myself a headache. Not at having to pay, but at having forgotten to move my car yet again. I feel like the guy from memento, hopefully I wont get run down by a (insert mode of transportation here) as I am wandering on the (insert location here) aimlessly in a senile stupor one day. rant over.
Views: 241
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on
-
Maybe so at some level, but I disagree strongly that it's a primary motivation.
There need to be negative consequences for irresponsible motor vehicle use, since the majority of drivers don't seem likely to abide by some sort of "honor system" judging by current behavior.
Adriana said:True, but it is the underlying ;o) reason why the city has to come up with new and creative ways to nickel and dime...
-
-
Oh, and Adriana:
-
Permalink Reply by heather s on
-
Lose the car, but stay away from the Michelob Ultra. You're welcome.
H3N3 said:Oh, and Adriana:
-
Permalink Reply by Tank-Ridin' Ryan on
-
Don't lose the taste, eh? How can you if it isn't there to begin with?
And I do love the implication to ride while drunk.
H3N3 said:Oh, and Adriana:
-
-
Adriana said:Huh...are you saying there should not be any public parking at all? Hey if the devil can get sympathy, so can I! So stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
T.C. O'Rourke said:Why the hell do we allow individuals to store their private property in the public right of way to begin with?
Regardless, were you really imagining sympathy over your parking tickets from the bicyclist forum?
Looks like a . . .
-
Permalink Reply by Lee Diamond on
-
I have a slightly different opinion on this one.
I think that laws should be used in mass frenzy to make money.
I think that the goal of law enforcement should be to run the city with the money it makes from people who break the 3 foot rule law, speeding, red lights, and every other POSSIBLE revenue generating enforcement of existing laws. I’m mad that they don’t do it more, and the mad, crazy, psycho-wild enforcement I envision would pay for the staff needed to do it, and everything else you can imagine. I would like to see some of these fees doubled, tripled and quadrupled. I would like to see the city use, for example, the money derived from enforcement of the 3 foot rule for the creation of bike lanes, bike boulevards, etc. Those that make it unsafe for cyclists could pay for the separation of cyclists from the traffic that endangers them. Just as an example.
Not that this would ever happen. The uproar if someone were to even PROPOSE enforcement of the laws would be enough to have them lose whatever election they were running in, or run out on a rail otherwise. In Schaumburg last year, a Red Light camera was catching people turning right on red into Woodfield Mall, when it was not allowed; this wasn't a situation where right on red was ok. The vast number of complaints from citizens who were breaking the law and threatened to stop shopping at Woodfield Mall caused them to remove the camera, not change the law, because they agreed it was unsafe for pedestrians crossing there for it to be a legal right turn on red. They therefore are completely complicit in allowing people to break the law, who got pissed off for getting a ticket for the law they were breaking on the way to their shopping orgy or whatever.
Seems amazing, but it's just what happens when you enforce a law that is there. Somehow, the people enforced "upon" suddenly feel put-upon.
The law is toothless if it is not enforced, but this is a society that likes to have enough laws to appear like we are doing things for safety, public concern, etc. It is only when it interferes in their personal convenience that the conspiracy theories come out.
We are right in the middle of “hate-the-cyclists” letters to the Editors season right now, so every other day, you can see another recommendation from a letter-writer that cyclists get ticketed for running red lights, or get licensed, or what have you. The fact is that most people break tons of laws every day, and rely on the lack of enforcement to get by and continuously do so. Jaywalking, spitting on sidewalks, cruising through stop signs, illegal rights on red and a million other offenses. Have you ever seen a car come to a complete stop when there weren’t either cars waiting turns, or a cop? Me neither. I’m all for the enforcement of existing laws with cyclists too, as long as the laws get enforced equally for cars, which are far more deadly and imposing on public safety. Since there are an infinite number of people doing an infinite number of things that they shouldn’t, it is a good way to separate the good laws from the chaff….the ones society really cares about, from the ones they would just presume they didn’t have to worry about.
I am not glad that you personally got a ticket, but I am glad they ticketed a car that was breaking the law and pulled some money out of the pockets of someone who did something wrong so that they need that much less from the populace as a whole.
And yes, I drive.
Cheers - Lee
-
Permalink Reply by Rick norris on
-
Not really wanting to high jack too much, I thought this would be good place to remind all the bick riders as your doing a great job of cutting down on air pollution and stiking it to big oil companies, dont forget to move your car once every seven days..or you also can get a ticket, daleys way of rewarding you for being green.
-
Permalink Reply by T.C. O'Rourke on
-
Adriana said:Huh...are you saying there should not be any public parking at all? !
Yes, that is what I'm saying. The roadway is public space set aside to enable the movement of people between private properties. TRAVEL. A goodly portion of this public space is taken up by motorists storing their personal vehicles, to the detriment of the system.
And removing parking from the street would open up all sorts of space for wider sidewalks and bicycle facilities.
-
-
Bick riders? I just vomited all over my keyboard. Oops.
Rick norris said:Not really wanting to high jack too much, I thought this would be good place to remind all the bick riders as your doing a great job of cutting down on air pollution and stiking it to big oil companies, dont forget to move your car once every seven days..or you also can get a ticket, daleys way of rewarding you for being green.
-
Permalink Reply by Joe TV on
-
Just scanned this thread and didn't see this, but forgive me if I'm being redundant. This is absolutely an idea whose time has come.
City-issued text message reminders before street cleaning.
http://theexpiredmeter.com/?p=6710
-
Permalink Reply by Will on
-
They don't sweep the street where I live, it's a filthy semi-industrial area. But anyway, I have a parking lot.
-
Permalink Reply by Mark Kenseth on
-
lol, h3n3. chuck woolery would approve...and then be back in 2 and 2.
also, i vote to get rid of the car. i did and have so much less to worry about. i love not owning a car. (but i still don't drink michelob.)
H3N3 said:Adriana said:Huh...are you saying there should not be any public parking at all? Hey if the devil can get sympathy, so can I! So stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
T.C. O'Rourke said:Why the hell do we allow individuals to store their private property in the public right of way to begin with?
Regardless, were you really imagining sympathy over your parking tickets from the bicyclist forum?
Looks like a . . .
Groups
-
Chicagoland Beer Explora…
203 members
-
Critical Mass discussion
262 members
-
Chicago Randonneurs
269 members
-
Walk Bike Transit
63 members
-
British Bicycles of Chic…
172 members
© 2008-2016 The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.
Powered by
