The Chainlink

Article link here.

Views: 197

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes, it's great information...fortunately/unfortunately you can just cross-reference dates against Google for more information on some of the accidents and fatalities.  I found myself doing so a couple nights ago and it is a sobering experience.

 

Thanks Steven.

Cool project Steve!

I noticed the Milwaukee/Ogdon/Chicago intersection is particularly dangerous, I work right there and have seen a lot of accidents in the past 3 or four years. 

 

The map also shows what a great alternative Elston Ave is compare to Milwaukee.

I think you are drawing conclusions that cannot be made?

Just because there are fewer accidents doesn't make it a safer street. You have to take into account the number of cyclists riding a certain street.

You might be comparing apples to oranges

 

Kelvin Mulcky said:


The map also shows what a great alternative Elston Ave is compare to Milwaukee.

I guess you're right. But, Elston is safer, right? I ride both streets all the time (between Augusta and Foster) and prefer Elston. There are a few factors not referenced on the map that made me think that Elston is safer: 1. Wider and more defined bike lanes 2. Less cab traffic 3. Less retail development 4. less bike traffic

yeah, for all those reasons...elston is superior to milwaukee.  it may be a hair out of the way, but it really is like riding in the country.  few cars, few bikes, zero meandering peds, few establishments for cars to jump out of, a wide road, complete with a bike lane.

 

train tracks and a few short stretches of shitty pavement would be my only concern.

Kelvin Mulcky said:

I guess you're right. But, Elston is safer, right? I ride both streets all the time (between Augusta and Foster) and prefer Elston. There are a few factors not referenced on the map that made me think that Elston is safer: 1. Wider and more defined bike lanes 2. Less cab traffic 3. Less retail development 4. less bike traffic

i see too many cyclists ignore the traffic signals here. this intersection is riddled with blind corners for both cyclists and motorists, and its an area where patience is lacking. plus that crosswalk over the northbound highway entrance at ogden is dangerous for all.

Kelvin Mulcky said:

Cool project Steve!

I noticed the Milwaukee/Ogdon/Chicago intersection is particularly dangerous, I work right there and have seen a lot of accidents in the past 3 or four years. 

 

The map also shows what a great alternative Elston Ave is compare to Milwaukee.

You're welcome. I'm trying to obtain data from 2005 and 2006.

If you want to see automated bike counts CDOT took in 2009, you'll have to bug them to release the report.


J M said:

Thanks for putting this out there Steven.

I recently moved to Avondale and I can easily access Elston (in spitting distance) or Milwaukee Avenue (5 minutes away).

I much prefer Milwaukee.

About Elston: I don't like the constantly changing geometry of the road that moves the bike lane towards the curb in some parts, away from the curb in other parts, around right turn lanes into Best Buy/Kohl's, or the 340 feet of "open hunting season" when you cross Ashland at Armitage. 

Elston also had a lot of potholes in the bike lane - some of them are "normal" while others are because of sunken sewer covers or grates. Then there's the constant threat of drivers turning into and out of the constant strip mall driveways. 

Around Morton Salt, going northbound, you have a huge opportunity for a right hook, and you have to take it carefully over the embedded railroad tracks and then the concrete pavement where the road was cut for electrical or sewer access. 

Kelvin Mulcky said:

I guess you're right. But, Elston is safer, right? I ride both streets all the time (between Augusta and Foster) and prefer Elston. There are a few factors not referenced on the map that made me think that Elston is safer: 1. Wider and more defined bike lanes 2. Less cab traffic 3. Less retail development 4. less bike traffic

I prefer Milwaukee myself as well although Elston isn't too bad except for a few spots.  Milwaukee has a LOT more bike traffic and the cars seem to be more used to seeing bikes while Elston is a ghost town.

 

There is that section going south on Elston just past Staples and the Tennis complex coming up on Fullerton where the cars will run your ass right over trying to get in the right lane to eventually (maybe) turn right.  Also, if you heading towards downtown and are attempting to turn left onto Damon to go to North over the bridge towards Menards or Costco you are taking your own life in your hands sitting in that intersection -especially since the oncoming light stays green even after your light turns red and you are stuck in that intersection like a sitting duck for a LONG time.  This is true whether you are on a bike or even in a car.   At least in a car they (probably) won't run your butt over.  

 

That whole intersection at Damon/Fullerton/Elston is totally fracked up and dangerous for everyone IMHO -especially bikes.   And since fewer bikes ride on Elston the cars are looking for us as much.  Milwaukee is much more friendly as it is Hipster Highway and cars know it and have accepted us being there. 

Derek Eder made a better map using the same data.

http://derekeder.com/maps/chicago-bike-crash-reports/

Doorings are still not there.

Steven thank you for posting this.  I introduced 2 friends last week, they figured out they both were hit (with injuries) at the same intersection.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service