copy and pasted from chicagoist
http://chicagoist.com/2011/07/20/rolling_pub_crawl_owners_sue_city.php
--------------------
Minneapolis-based PedalPub is a "bike-powered pub crawl." It's essentially a large bike, powered by 16 people pedaling, steered by a guide who sits behind a keg, that rolls from bar to bar. (Amstel Light has used a version of PedalPub in recent years around Wrigley Field.)
The owners of PedalPub have sued the city because they were denied a business license. PedalPub Chicago's Matt Graham said the city sees his company as a sightseeing operation. “Which we’re not," Graham said. "We can never be because we don’t operate a motorized vehicle.”
Graham is up front about Pedal Pub's intention to be nothing more than a bike-powered pub crawl. Having biked from bar to bar over the years ourselves, we're just a little bit jealous we hadn't hit upon this business model.
We can also see how the city is objecting to this, without outright coming out and saying the last thing they want to do is grant a business license to a rolling vehicle powered by drunks. besides, the bike taxis at Wrigley Field and U.S> Cellular Field already serve as ad hoc bike bar crawls already.
--------------
Tags:
The city needs to come out and say "no you can't drink and drive/bike"
The problem is the city is not saying that, they are saying you can't have sightseeing tours with human powered vehicles, which will be bad for any new business, and potentially force all the bike/segway renters to end any tours they offer and force them to just rent only. You couldn't even have this vehicle used for things like architecture tours.
But yes, I agree these are pretty ridiculous, I just think for everyone involved the city needs to put it to rest for the right reasons.
But I don't think the passengers here are actually driving/biking in any real sense. Sure, they're providing the power, but it's the (presumably sober) driver who controls the steering and the brakes. So where's the bad?
I think the city's real concern here is that this is a large, slow vehicle that is difficult to fit into existing traffic patterns. My feeling on that is: it's time to change the traffic patterns. Chicago has a number of districts (Wrigleyville, North/Damen, Michigan ave perhaps) that at least at certain times are dominated by pedestrian and non-motorized traffic, and yet the overwhelming amount of public space in those areas is dedicated to automobiles. That's ridiculous.
Services like a pedal-powered minibus (which is all this is, despite the pub crawl theme) are a step in making these areas more pedestrian and bike friendly.
Chris B said:
The city needs to come out and say "no you can't drink and drive/bike"
I saw these in Minneapolis recently and thought it looked like a lot of fun, and we need these here! There is indeed a driver of the vehicle -- not depicted in the photo above -- who is an employee of the company, is stone cold sober, and he's facing forward, driving it like a pedicab. The drinkers just provide pedal power but don't control braking or steering.
For licensing purposes, these should be treated more like horse-drawn carriages (also take up a lot of room on the streets and go very slowly but add charm and ambience) or pedicabs (non-motorized transportation service). I could see them being very popular everywhere from Viagra Triangle to Ukrainian Village to Andersonville.
If you read the full article (or go to the company's website) you'll find that you can't actually drink (alcohol) while riding in the vehicle. it is just meant as transportation between pubs. You can drink coffee (and other non-alcoholic beverages) eat and smoke (go figure) while riding however.
Maybe this clarifies?
From the PedalPub FAQ:
The PedalPub is still being rejected by the city.
For anyone interested, there is a petition HERE to show support and keep them in Chicago.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members