Hoping someone can shed light on this situation. I have heard of the new law but am uncertain of the details.
Today on my commute home a man in his piece of S**T car X49 1777 plates ran me into the curb at the intersection of Halsted, Broadway, and the IHOP street. He tried to squeeze past me to beat the line of cars in the left lane going north bound on Halsted (then Broadway). It was a red light and I knocked on his window to inform of the three foot rule etc. He mocked me by saying "Yes maaaammm how can I help YOU?" Like I was asking for grey poupon mustard. He kept his eye on the light and not me. I said he almost clipped me. He waited for the light and sped off saying "almost, almost"
Next light, I pass in the bicycle lane. I know he is somewhere in the line of cars so VERY cautious to stay closer to parked cars. He passes and immediately swerves right in front of me with no obstacle to require him to do so. It was blatantly obvious is was geared at me.
Why the attitude on his part? Why the second swerve? Does this qualify for the bicycle harrassment law I mentioned above?
Just curious...however I know karma will take care of his sorry ass. Umph!
Tags:
Here is the link to the post on this at my blog www.ILBicycleLaw.com.
The difficulty you will have is getting the police and/or the state's attorney's office to do anything about this as a criminal matter. What I recommend that you do is call your local police station (not 311, call your local "cop shop") and ask to fill out a report. Cite the exact statute for the police officer (i.e. do their job for them) and maybe they will act on it. Good luck. Feel free to email me if you have any questions.
Here's the statue as amended this year. The underlined portions are what was added. Feel free to email with any questions.
Mike Keating Twitter: @ILBicycleLaw
|
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, |
represented in the General Assembly: |
Section 5. The Illinois Vehicle Code is amended by changing |
Section 11-703 as follows: |
(625 ILCS 5/11-703) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-703) |
Sec. 11-703. Overtaking a vehicle on the left. The |
following rules govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles |
proceeding in the same direction, subject to those limitations, |
exceptions, and special rules otherwise stated in this Chapter: |
(a) The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle |
proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left |
thereof at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the |
right side of the roadway until safely clear of the |
overtaken vehicle. In no event shall such movement be made |
by driving off the pavement or the main traveled portion of |
the roadway. |
(b) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is |
permitted, the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall give |
way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle on |
audible signal and shall not increase the speed of his |
vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. |
(c) The driver of a 2 wheeled vehicle may not, in |
passing upon the left of any vehicle proceeding in the same |
||
direction, pass upon the right of any vehicle proceeding in |
||
the same direction unless there is an unobstructed lane of |
||
traffic available to permit such passing maneuver safely. |
||
(d) The operator of a motor vehicle overtaking a |
||
bicycle or individual proceeding in the same direction on a |
||
highway shall leave a safe distance, but not less than 3 |
||
feet, when passing the bicycle or individual and shall |
||
maintain that distance until safely past the overtaken |
||
bicycle or individual. |
||
(e) A person driving a motor vehicle shall not, in a |
||
reckless manner, drive the motor vehicle unnecessarily |
||
close to, toward, or near a bicyclist, pedestrian, or a |
||
person riding a horse or driving an animal drawn vehicle. |
||
(f) Every person convicted of paragraph (e) of this |
||
Section shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor if the |
||
violation does not result in great bodily harm or permanent |
||
disability or disfigurement to another. If the violation |
||
results in great bodily harm or permanent disability or |
||
disfigurement to another, the person shall be guilty of a |
||
Class 3 felony. |
||
(Source: P.A. 95-231, eff. 1-1-08.) |
It all depends. A lot of it has to do with the judgment call of the cop taking the call. That's why, whenever dealing with the police and reporting an incident or a collision ALWAYS do the following:
Remember, these new laws were put into place to PROTECT bicyclists from motor vehicles. Period. You are entitled to the protection of these laws. Don't let anyone ever let you think otherwise. Believe it or not Illinois has been pretty progressive on these issues. As our community grows we know have the full force and weight of these laws on our side. Let's us 'em to our advantage.
H3N3 said:
Great stuff, mike, thanks.
Do you know what the police would typically do with that report once filled out?
Realistically, the only time this law is enforced is against the driver AFTER a collision with a cyclist. Or perhaps if an officer actually witnessed the action. Otherwise, it is your word against the driver's.
Don't try and teach these crazy drivers a lesson. I had a similar driver going north on Clark that would pull into the right lane at every red light. Be careful out there!
All you can do, as a practical matter, is be persistent with the police.
As a civil matter, your could file a lawsuit for assault. But if you were not injured I would not counsel someone to do that b/c of the time/expense involved. But there would be legal grounds for a civil case and if a person felt strongly enough about it, they could pursue it.
H3N3 said:
Thanks, Mike.
So, you fill out a report. You receive a copy in the mail eventually. If you do it in person you can take a copy home with you. What else would/could result from having filled out that report in this particular situation? Per my limited understanding (from trying to get action in response to witnessed bike thefts) the report gets assigned to a detective who adds it to their stack of reports to review and either take some action on, or put in a 'dead' pile. Typically, once one finds out which detective has been assigned, one calls and tries to speak to that detective (I believe the detective is supposed to contact the 'victim' but that often doesn't happen.). What could that detective do in this particular situation?
Appreciate any additional insight, or corrections about anything that may be wrong about what I've described.
Mike Keating said:
It all depends. A lot of it has to do with the judgment call of the cop taking the call. That's why, whenever dealing with the police and reporting an incident or a collision ALWAYS do the following:
- Provide as much detail as possible such as license plate number, color of car, make/model, etc. This gives your story credibility.
- Let the police know specifically what is that driver did that is a violation of the law. That's why I recommended citing the EXACT statute for the police. If they make a police report they would include this info. Like any of us, if someone makes a job easier for us we are more likely to follow through on it.
- Be persistent. Don't let the police talk you out of it. Tell them you want a police report filed. If you really want to follow up on it you can call 311 or give your Alderman's office a call.
Remember, these new laws were put into place to PROTECT bicyclists from motor vehicles. Period. You are entitled to the protection of these laws. Don't let anyone ever let you think otherwise. Believe it or not Illinois has been pretty progressive on these issues. As our community grows we know have the full force and weight of these laws on our side. Let's us 'em to our advantage.
H3N3 said:
Great stuff, mike, thanks.
Do you know what the police would typically do with that report once filled out?
Thank you Mike! I was actually searching your site right before I posted on Chainlink. I saw the new addition but was confused as far as action I could take. So I'm going to file a report because letting one idiot "off the hook" allows lots of other drivers be reckless.
Thanks for the patch and sticker by the way. I proudly wear it on my messager bag!
Mike Keating said:
It all depends. A lot of it has to do with the judgment call of the cop taking the call. That's why, whenever dealing with the police and reporting an incident or a collision ALWAYS do the following:
- Provide as much detail as possible such as license plate number, color of car, make/model, etc. This gives your story credibility.
- Let the police know specifically what is that driver did that is a violation of the law. That's why I recommended citing the EXACT statute for the police. If they make a police report they would include this info. Like any of us, if someone makes a job easier for us we are more likely to follow through on it.
- Be persistent. Don't let the police talk you out of it. Tell them you want a police report filed. If you really want to follow up on it you can call 311 or give your Alderman's office a call.
Remember, these new laws were put into place to PROTECT bicyclists from motor vehicles. Period. You are entitled to the protection of these laws. Don't let anyone ever let you think otherwise. Believe it or not Illinois has been pretty progressive on these issues. As our community grows we know have the full force and weight of these laws on our side. Let's us 'em to our advantage.
H3N3 said:
Great stuff, mike, thanks.
Do you know what the police would typically do with that report once filled out?
I would think that filing a report would (at the very least) provide a record of this driver being a jerkwad. Then in the probable future when this guy hits someone, he would have a history of bad driving to work against him. I don't know if thats really the case but I'd like to think that it would work that way.
Exactly.
Without witnesses it becomes a "he said/she said" situation where nothing can be done about it without there having been actual bodily harm or property damage coming to the "victim." Without a sworn officer of the law witnessing it then it is merely a complaint by a random citizen. Having such a complain show up on a person's driving record would be punitive and without any due process or even the word of a sworn law officer. Even a ticket issued by a sworn officer isn't official until it is either payed and the offender waiving his right to a trial or the parties go in front of an actual judge in traffic court.
Unfortunately this is just the way it is -but would you rather have just anyone able to claim you did something wrong and you having zero chance of facing your accuser or even knowing about the infraction? I could claim just about anything. If I didn't like Joe Smith I could just claim he tried to run me off the road on the way to work and it ends up on his record? Doesn't sound very fair to me. There are too many wackados out there with axes to grind...
H3N3 said:
In this case there are no witnesses. Had Kelly called 911 about it at the time a cop would probably have told her "nothing we can do, it's just your word against the driver's." If the police would take a report, It's doubtful a detective would ever even run the plate-- the report will likely end up in a pile and eventually just go to storage. Nothing would end up on that person's record.
It would take considerable follow-through from Kelly to have any other outcome.
I would absolutely love to see some consequence for this driver, but giving Kelly advice that involves an investment of her time and has little potential for any consequence is not being helpful to her, despite what I'm sure are good intentions.
I would be happy to be proven wrong-- if Kelly is willing to pursue this as sort of an "experiment" we could all come away with a better understanding of what the options are in a motorist harrassment situation.
My gut feeling is feel free to call him in at the time and claim he's driving around like a drunk. He was swerving right in front of you.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members