It sucks all those wheels got boosted the other day! What is your opinion on using a cable to lock them up?
I am curious as to your take on cables to lock wheels. More specifically whether you use a thick or a thin cable. In my case I own one of each but I always wonder if the extra weight and bulkiness of the thick OnGuard cable is worth it. I mean, if a thief has a cutter, its only going to take a couple additional snips to defeat the thicker cable compared to the thin and light one.
It will only buy me an extra 3 seconds of "security", so is it worth the extra bulk and weight and pain of coiling it back up?
It will only buy me an extra 3 seconds of "security", so is it worth the extra bulk and weight and pain of coiling it back up?
Views: 69
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on
-
My impression after reading over 1,000 submissions to the Stolen Bike Registry is that they're better than nothing, but not by much. Lots of "cross-locked" bikes stolen.
I've been using 2 U-locks for at least 5 years, and 5 years ago maybe it was overkill, but I think we're currently getting to the point where that's a basic necessity.
-
Permalink Reply by T.C. O'Rourke on
-
It sounds like a lanyard-- a cable looped through the wheels and u-lock-- would have prevented the wheel thefts you reference... or at least shifted the theft to other bikes :(
I think cross locking --using a u-lock *and* separate cable lock-- is as good if not better than 2 u-locks.
Howard, I don't recall ever seeing a cross locked bike on the SBR. Have you? Can you generate reports from the data on that site?
Anecdotally, I do think u-lock cutting type theft is on the rise and predict an explosion this summer...
-
-
Many, many, many.
No way to filter for them though-- will have to ask Paul if we can reflect cross-locked bikes somehow in the stats.
I think one of the most recent two or three is one such though, for example.
There's a "stats" page but it does a not-so-great job of telling the story as people select the wrong thing more often than I have time to thoroughly edit (for example about one out of 3 victims select U-lock when no U-lock was compromised to steal the bike-- we've tried various changes to the way the choices are presented but nothing helps).
T.C. O'Rourke said:It sounds like a lanyard-- a cable looped through the wheels and u-lock-- would have prevented the wheel thefts you reference... or at least shifted the theft to other bikes :(
I think cross locking --using a u-lock *and* separate cable lock-- is as good if not better than 2 u-locks. Howard, I don't recall ever seeing a cross locked bike on the SBR. Have you? Can you generate reports from the data on that site? Anecdotally, I do think u-lock cutting type theft is on the rise and predict an explosion this summer...
-
Permalink Reply by Moc Artsy on
-
Has anyone tried an alarmed lock? I think they are mainly with cable-type systems and would have to be used with a u-lock, but evidently they sound even when only moved. I can see how these might be more annoying than helpful, especially if the bike owner is in a noisy bar, but they may have a deterrent effect.
-
Permalink Reply by Doug Haynes on
-
People snake wheels because they are easy to get so any kind of lock or cable is going to slow them down and shift the theft to the next bike in line.
-
Permalink Reply by Bryan D on
-
I use two u-locks (front frame and wheel to bike rack, back frame and wheel to bike rack, if there's room) and I have a thick cable that I snake through my seat and rear wheel and attach that to the rear u-lock.
It might be overkill, but when a bike thief is sizing up the options on the block, I'm pretty sure mine looks like it's more work than it's worth.
-
Permalink Reply by Ryan L on
-
I usually lock my New York U-lock through front wheel and frame to rack with a cable through the rear. Sometimes it is hard to accomplish if there is not an actual bike rack to lock to. The problem with some of these group rides is that there is hardly a rack for one bike let alone racks to accommodate 30+ bikes. When my wheel was stolen I was unable to get the ulock through both the front wheel and frame, my cable did not reach as well. This is just how it is when multiple bikes need to lock up in an area with zero racks available.
-
-
Yup, and making your bike less attractive to a thief than the next one is about all you can really do.
notoriousDUG said:People snake wheels because they are easy to get so any kind of lock or cable is going to slow them down and shift the theft to the next bike in line.
-
-
I've received a few reports of double U-locked bikes being stolen, but so far none with 2 U-locks and a thick cable :-)
Bryan D said:I use two u-locks (front frame and wheel to bike rack, back frame and wheel to bike rack, if there's room) and I have a thick cable that I snake through my seat and rear wheel and attach that to the rear u-lock.
It might be overkill, but when a bike thief is sizing up the options on the block, I'm pretty sure mine looks like it's more work than it's worth.
-
-
Howard, I just read through 10 pages of theft reports on the Stolen Bike Registry without seeing a single one which listed that both a U-lock and separate cable lock were used.
In addition, there is no way to indicate both or cross locked under "lock type".
I am going to respectfully disagree with your assertion that using a lanyard or separate cable lock in addition to a U-lock is of little help. Both prevent wheels, saddles or whatever it is looped around from being stolen without *some* kind of tool. The cable lock is another thing to cut, slowing down the theft, albiet slightly.
Reconsidering my previous post, I think that using 2 *modern* style u-locks, the shackles of each must be twice, or four cuts total, is vastly superior to one each U & cable locks.
But answering the question, using a cable/cable lock to secure wheels is a good idea.
H3N3 said:Many, many, many.
No way to filter for them though-- will have to ask Paul if we can reflect cross-locked bikes somehow in the stats. I think one of the most recent two or three is one such though, for example. There's a "stats" page but it does a not-so-great job of telling the story as people select the wrong thing more often than I have time to thoroughly edit (for example about one out of 3 victims select U-lock when no U-lock was compromised to steal the bike-- we've tried various changes to the way the choices are presented but nothing helps).
-
-
Well, my words exactly were "better than nothing, but not by much" - I stand by them.
Certainly in the case of the pub crawl caper, the bikes with even thin cables would probably have been passed over, so they would have helped in that particular situation.
I did say that you can't search for cross-locked bikes-- not sure how that resulted in a "disagreement."
The very top listing at the moment is a cross-locked bike-- how could you miss that?
T.C. O'Rourke said:Howard, I just read through 10 pages of theft reports on the Stolen Bike Registry without seeing a single one which listed that both a U-lock and separate cable lock were used.
In addition, there is no way to indicate both or cross locked under "lock type".
I am going to respectfully disagree with your assertion that using a lanyard or separate cable lock in addition to a U-lock is of little help. Both prevent wheels, saddles or whatever it is looped around from being stolen without *some* kind of tool. The cable lock is another thing to cut, slowing down the theft, albiet slightly.
Reconsidering my previous post, I think that using 2 *modern* style u-locks, the shackles of each must be twice, or four cuts total, is vastly superior to one each U & cable locks.
But answering the question, using a cable/cable lock to secure wheels is a good idea.
H3N3 said:Many, many, many.
No way to filter for them though-- will have to ask Paul if we can reflect cross-locked bikes somehow in the stats. I think one of the most recent two or three is one such though, for example. There's a "stats" page but it does a not-so-great job of telling the story as people select the wrong thing more often than I have time to thoroughly edit (for example about one out of 3 victims select U-lock when no U-lock was compromised to steal the bike-- we've tried various changes to the way the choices are presented but nothing helps).
-
-
H3N3 said:I did say that you can't search for cross-locked bikes-- not sure how that resulted in a "disagreement."
I meant that the cross locking data isn't easy to enter and therefore spotty.
H3N3 said:The very top listing at the moment is a cross-locked bike-- how could you miss that?"
D'oh!!
Groups
-
Critical Mass discussion
262 members
-
Chicagoland Beer Explora…
203 members
-
Chicago Randonneurs
269 members
-
Walk Bike Transit
63 members
-
British Bicycles of Chic…
172 members
© 2008-2016 The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.
Powered by
