Tags:
I agree completely.
Duppie 13.5185km said:
The only mods I have been able to figure out are Melissa and Chi Lowe. Both because they made themselves known.
It should be open knowledge: 1 who the moderators are, 2. What are the rules they moderate by.
It also works better if moderation happens in the open. Not because I want to argue with the moderators whether they are correct or not, but because it can create clarity what is acceptable and what is not acceptable on the Chainlink. I’m pretty sure that no one has any problem with moderation if it is applied evenly and consistently. It’s the off-list conversations that undermine the credibility of the moderators.
Kevin C said:The Chainlink used to identify who the moderators were. In the other thread, Melissa said she's one of a dozen. The Mods Activity Group says there are 7. Knowing who they are not only seems reasonable, it seems necessary.
I concur!
Craig S. said:
I agree completely.
Duppie 13.5185km said:The only mods I have been able to figure out are Melissa and Chi Lowe. Both because they made themselves known.
It should be open knowledge: 1 who the moderators are, 2. What are the rules they moderate by.
It also works better if moderation happens in the open. Not because I want to argue with the moderators whether they are correct or not, but because it can create clarity what is acceptable and what is not acceptable on the Chainlink. I’m pretty sure that no one has any problem with moderation if it is applied evenly and consistently. It’s the off-list conversations that undermine the credibility of the moderators.
Kevin C said:The Chainlink used to identify who the moderators were. In the other thread, Melissa said she's one of a dozen. The Mods Activity Group says there are 7. Knowing who they are not only seems reasonable, it seems necessary.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members