After slamming Critical Mass, I'm thinking of doing the one in September so I can see what it's like to participate. I'm trying to keep an open mind, but I can't reconcile all of the inconvenience and disruption caused by CM with its lack of meaning. I appreciate civil disobedience, but only if it's to work toward some goal, which CM doesn't seem to have.
Can you help me understand CM better to help me decide if I should participate? I'm not trolling or being a devil's advocate - and I understand if no one wants to beat this dead horse yet again.
Tags:
Cars are an annoyance 24/7 for bicyclists trying to use the common streets.
That's the point for CCM for many who participate.
Boo hoo. Get over it as you have to sit in your car for 10 minutes waiting for traffic to clear for CCM. If you drive in Chicago being stuck in your car for a variety of reasons (It's Monday!) should be second-nature by now.
My issue with the CCM is about politics and persuasion. If you want to convince people to share the road, and you do so by . . . refusing to share the road with them, that is a tough sell. The confrontational nature of CCM alienates potential allies. I've always argued that a truly convincing Critical Mass would do the opposite of what it does: instead of massing downtown and then heading out someplace, relying on cops to stop car traffic, pick a destination (downtown or elsewhere) and have everyone ride to that destination along half a dozen chosen routes, sharing the road all the way and obeying all the traffic laws. Show drivers that cyclists can do that, and you might change some minds. Cause gridlock, not so much.
always helpful...Cars are an annoyance 24/7 for bicyclists trying to use the common streets.
That's the point for CCM for many who participate.
Boo hoo. Get over it as you have to sit in your car for 10 minutes waiting for traffic to clear for CCM. If you drive in Chicago being stuck in your car for a variety of reasons (It's Monday!) should be second-nature by now.
You go and organize that ride Bill. Nobody is stopping you..
Bill Savage said:
My issue with the CCM is about politics and persuasion. If you want to convince people to share the road, and you do so by . . . refusing to share the road with them, that is a tough sell. The confrontational nature of CCM alienates potential allies. I've always argued that a truly convincing Critical Mass would do the opposite of what it does: instead of massing downtown and then heading out someplace, relying on cops to stop car traffic, pick a destination (downtown or elsewhere) and have everyone ride to that destination along half a dozen chosen routes, sharing the road all the way and obeying all the traffic laws. Show drivers that cyclists can do that, and you might change some minds. Cause gridlock, not so much.
There is no need to FOWL-up this debate with your well-reasoned opinions
Crafty Cycling Chick said:
I moved to Chicago on New Year's Day 2002 and started riding CCM in July 2002. CCM and its related events are how I met all but two of the people I know and love in Chicago. I learned how to ride all year long, ditched my lifelong Winter Blues, put the skills I learned in a sewing class to use to make balaclavas, gaiters, and scarves for shivering cyclists, and my 20-year love affair with making zines gets to be expressed through The Derailleur. I wonder what my life would look like if I hadn't ditched my car before moving to Chicago...I owe my happiness to CCM and the people I've met because of it. No one's whining is going to change my mind. xowillow
Bill Savage wrote:
My issue with the CCM is about politics and persuasion. If you want to convince people to share the road, and you do so by . . . refusing to share the road with them, that is a tough sell. The confrontational nature of CCM alienates potential allies. I've always argued that a truly convincing Critical Mass would do the opposite of what it does: instead of massing downtown and then heading out someplace, relying on cops to stop car traffic, pick a destination (downtown or elsewhere) and have everyone ride to that destination along half a dozen chosen routes, sharing the road all the way and obeying all the traffic laws. Show drivers that cyclists can do that, and you might change some minds. Cause gridlock, not so much.
My Comment:
There is an interesting parallel with the War in Viet Nam. The first opposition to the War arose among the "grandmothers". And then the Student demonstrations started. The Students didn't follow the societal norms and didn't "look" or "act" like the rest. So the Grandmothers started supporting the war. And the end of the war was likely delayed for a number of years. And the students were "self-gratified". And that's the problem with Critical Mass. By massively violating the traffic rules, intentionally picking a peak period to ride, and the like, CM certainly gets visibility. And the more unusually dressed or outrageously acting get the greatest visibility. Just like the student "protesters" did in the 1960's. But it also turns off or makes enemies of a number of people that might well be "supporters" of riding.
No doubt CM makes the participants feel good. But it also is impeding the promotion of cycling. If the "real" point is a "love of biking" as the common thread, then CM should pick another time that is far less disruptive such as a weekend afternoon. I don't and won't participate because I think that the final result is more important than instant self-gratification.
Those damn long-haired hippies!
What is the world coming to?
"Can you help me understand CM better to help me decide if I should participate?"
You are over thinking this...maybe it's not for you.
From the Chicago Critical Mass website:
Critical Mass is a bike ride plain and simple. The ride takes place on the Last Friday Of Every Month (in Chicago anyway). A Critical Mass is created when the group of riders comes together for those few hours to take back the streets of our city. The right of the people to assemble is guaranteed in the Constitution, and Critical Mass helps people remember that right. The Mass itself has no political agenda, though, no more than the people of any other community do. Critical Mass is open to all, and it welcomes all riders to join in a celebration of riding bicycles. Why? Because bikes are fun!
Sure, as with any community, you'll see people of all types. Some people see Critical Mass as a forum for grassroots political change. Some people see it as a protest against cars. Some people just like to ride. The Mass, however, is just that...a bunch of bike riders. You can drive a car the whole month and ride in the Mass. You can be an anarchist and ride in the Mass. The point of the Mass is the Mass, nothing more. Critical Mass has no leadership. It is a ride where no one is in charge. At any time, riders are free to leave, stay, stop, or even help out. Everyone is responsible for themselves and the Mass. Learn how to get involved!
Once you realize that, you're free to enjoy the exhilaration that is a large bike ride. It's quite a sight to be parading down Michigan Avenue with thousands of fellow riders, wishing pedestrians and drivers a "Happy Friday!" Chicago Critical Mass is a community, yet it's also part of a worldwide Critical Mass community as a whole.
Critical Mass rides take place all over the world each month, and Chicago is proud to join in to proclaim our love of bicycles. If you love bikes, and you want to show others how you feel about cycling, come join us!
From the Chicago Critical Mass website:
Critical Mass is a bike ride plain and simple. The ride takes place on the Last Friday Of Every Month (in Chicago anyway). A Critical Mass is created when the group of riders comes together for those few hours to take back the streets of our city. The right of the people to assemble is guaranteed in the Constitution, and Critical Mass helps people remember that right.
My Comment:
Yes. We all understand this point. Just because someone has the right do to something, doesn't mean that we should do something. No doubt the Constitution allows a "film maker" to make a bigoted, insulting attack on a religion. But that doesn't make is a smart thing to do.
If you think CM hasn't been a huge part of raising bicycle visibility, awareness, and safety, you are crazy. Cities used to be at complete war with CM, including mass arrests in NYC numerous times. The behavior of drivers is much, much, much improved in the 7 years I've been riding in the city. I haven't had anything thrown at me in almost 4 years now.
Drivers get free use of all roads for 29.5 days out of every 30. They can deal with having to wait 10 minutes at an intersection one day out of every month... and it's only a select area of the city. They're free to drive on all the other roads of Illinois unencumbered... including the ones that cyclists are banned from riding on ever (interstates, LSD, etc.).
Bill, CM isn't an organized protest movement. Thank god. It would be really annoying riding with agenda-driven cyclists in a monthly run-ride. I don't think I would attend something like that.
Cars and bikes are both equally allowed on the streets; why is it fair that motorists get full use of it 100% of the time? Let us have our three hours out of the entire month. Car drivers get stuck in traffic all the time – why is it more annoying when it's a bunch of people on bikes stopping traffic instead of other cars?
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members