Hello Fellow Cyclists,

I am working on a small project photographing stylish cyclists, and I want to photograph you with your bike (outside somewhere).  I have a few rules:

1.  No active wear, you should be wearing work clothes or going out clothes.  (unless you can make a case for a particularly nice looking "functional" outfit)

2.  I want all kinds of bikers but prefer women and commuters. 

3.  Look cute and dress up a little!

Send me your email and a photo (if you want) and I will contact you with a time slot.  You can have a hi-res digital copy of the photo. 

~thanks
martha williams

mafaw1@gmail.com

Views: 897

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Am I the only person (no offense to chic people) who finds "cycling chic" to be ridiculous? Seems to have started with some dude in Copenhagen blogging about fashionable Copenhagen people tooling around—but of course Copenhagen, strictly defined, is a third the size of Madison, so ladies are free to wear heels, not being inconvenienced by having to, like, ride their bikes moderate distances to get to work and such. For my part I find anything that keeps someone on a bike in Chicago in February, or allows someone to ride in busy traffic safely, to be stylish. In any event, the people of Latveria are encouraged to ride bicycles to work at Doombot factories wearing whatever they'd like.
No. But don't be caught dead on a bike that doesn't match your clothes.

Dr. Doom said:
Am I the only person (no offense to chic people) who finds "cycling chic" to be ridiculous?
Until I saw Ryan's response, my answer was going to be an emphatic "Yes." Now that I've seen Ryan's response, my answer is a qualified "Yes."


Tank-Ridin' Ryan said:
No. But don't be caught dead on a bike that doesn't match your clothes.

Dr. Doom said:
Am I the only person (no offense to chic people) who finds "cycling chic" to be ridiculous?
If you need a hipster who can match his outfit to his bike, I'll do it.

PS. My bike is awesome.
Hi All,

If you would like to start a thread debating the "Chic Cycle" aesthetic please start your own thread. This is a thread about me (martha) looking for people to photograph. Thank you kindly


Dr. Doom said:
Am I the only person (no offense to chic people) who finds "cycling chic" to be ridiculous? Seems to have started with some dude in Copenhagen blogging about fashionable Copenhagen people tooling around—but of course Copenhagen, strictly defined, is a third the size of Madison, so ladies are free to wear heels, not being inconvenienced by having to, like, ride their bikes moderate distances to get to work and such. For my part I find anything that keeps someone on a bike in Chicago in February, or allows someone to ride in busy traffic safely, to be stylish. In any event, the people of Latveria are encouraged to ride bicycles to work at Doombot factories wearing whatever they'd like.
Love it!


Fred Noinaj said:


all of these people.
WOW! You're new here, aren't you? Heh-heh-heh...


Martha Williams said:
Hi All,

If you would like to start a thread debating the "Chic Cycle" aesthetic please start your own thread. This is a thread about me (martha) looking for people to photograph. Thank you kindly


Well I don't mean to be rude, but if you're just looking for people to photograph and don't want to be bothered with backtalk you should probably take out an advertisement. Posting on a discussion forum tends to lead to... discussion.

There are two problems with the "cycle chic aesthetic." The first is that it assumes that what works in one culture works equally well in another, which isn't always true. Chicago, for example, is neither the size of a postage stamp nor a town that rarely sees temperatures much below 30 degrees. Thus practical cyclists here don't dress as they do elsewhere. The second, and more important, is that it purports to make cycling friendlier and more practical by offering the possibility of doing normal things in fabulous clothes while doing exactly the opposite. Cycling in heels and fedoras is simply not practical in Chicago for anything other than neighborhood jaunts or parades (not that there's anything wrong with either), and people who insist on doing so are cutting themselves off from a lot of what makes riding a bicycle fun and useful. "Cycle chic" is, essentially, a fetish.

What I'm suggesting is that there might be something to a notion of "cycle chic" that actually fits with life as cyclists live it in Chicago—something a bit less sexy, perhaps, than is on offer in certain European cities, but something that is at least our own. So sorry to be of any offense, but there really are places to take out advertisements and some of them don't even cost any money.
Notice T.C. distancing himself from the crowd...

I like the picture that you took of me when I used to work for Time Out Chicago. I can't locate my copy, but feel free to repost it if you have it still.

Cycle chic can be ridiculous, but it can also be fun.

Nick





Martha Williams said:
Love it!


Fred Noinaj said:


all of these people.
Having lived in the cycling chic's heaven (Netherlands) for nearly 30 years, I can attest that cycling chic even over there is a niche. What I (and everyone I knew) did was simply ride in their daily clothes. I wouldn't call sneakers and jeans cycling chic

Dr. Doom is right in that what might work over in Europe may not work here. Instead of trying to find those few people who attempt to copy this style in Chicago, why not focus on the US version of cycling chic: Hipsters. Regardless of your opinion about them, they often have a clear sense of style and are more closely aligned with US clothing trends, which tend to be more informal than clothing trends in Europe.

Lorena's picture is a prime example of what I mean. There is no way that can be called cycling chic (in the European definition of the word) but she has an absolutely crazy amount of style.

Dr. Doom said:
Well I don't mean to be rude, but if you're just looking for people to photograph and don't want to be bothered with backtalk you should probably take out an advertisement. Posting on a discussion forum tends to lead to... discussion.

There are two problems with the "cycle chic aesthetic." The first is that it assumes that what works in one culture works equally well in another, which isn't always true. Chicago, for example, is neither the size of a postage stamp nor a town that rarely sees temperatures much below 30 degrees. Thus practical cyclists here don't dress as they do elsewhere. The second, and more important, is that it purports to make cycling friendlier and more practical by offering the possibility of doing normal things in fabulous clothes while doing exactly the opposite. Cycling in heels and fedoras is simply not practical in Chicago for anything other than neighborhood jaunts or parades (not that there's anything wrong with either), and people who insist on doing so are cutting themselves off from a lot of what makes riding a bicycle fun and useful. "Cycle chic" is, essentially, a fetish.

What I'm suggesting is that there might be something to a notion of "cycle chic" that actually fits with life as cyclists live it in Chicago—something a bit less sexy, perhaps, than is on offer in certain European cities, but something that is at least our own. So sorry to be of any offense, but there really are places to take out advertisements and some of them don't even cost any money.
I'm interested but only mildly fashionable at best!
I have no problem biking through winter in my "daily clothes" with some creative layering. What is good about cycling in your daily clothes is that it makes cycling less intimidating to everyone. Studies have proven (see below link) that despite many different initiatives the main factor in reducing biking injuries and fatalities is how many people are riding. I personally bike in heels and a skirt 80% of the time. I have a job where I end up at a lot of fancy places and need to present myself well. I could totally hop in a cab and my work would pay for it, but I choose to cycle around Chicago. If I had to switch out my shoes and change outfits just to get on a bike I would never ride.
I've had many women come up to me and ask about commuting on a bike. I give them lots of tips and tell them that it is easy, because it IS. You don't NEED to wear anything special, just wear what you are wearing. (except slick bottomed shoes) So feel free to keep wearing your moisture wicking underlayers and athletic shoes. I'm wearing heels and a skirt till there is snow on the ground. Lets see how many people you encourage to ride a bike vs me.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=getting-more-bicyc...



Duppie said:
Having lived in the cycling chic's heaven (Netherlands) for nearly 30 years, I can attest that cycling chic even over there is a niche. What I (and everyone I knew) did was simply ride in their daily clothes. I wouldn't call sneakers and jeans cycling chic

Dr. Doom is right in that what might work over in Europe may not work here. Instead of trying to find those few people who attempt to copy this style in Chicago, why not focus on the US version of cycling chic: Hipsters. Regardless of your opinion about them, they often have a clear sense of style and are more closely aligned with US clothing trends, which tend to be more informal than clothing trends in Europe.

Lorena's picture is a prime example of what I mean. There is no way that can be called cycling chic (in the European definition of the word) but she has an absolutely crazy amount of style.

Dr. Doom said:
Well I don't mean to be rude, but if you're just looking for people to photograph and don't want to be bothered with backtalk you should probably take out an advertisement. Posting on a discussion forum tends to lead to... discussion.

There are two problems with the "cycle chic aesthetic." The first is that it assumes that what works in one culture works equally well in another, which isn't always true. Chicago, for example, is neither the size of a postage stamp nor a town that rarely sees temperatures much below 30 degrees. Thus practical cyclists here don't dress as they do elsewhere. The second, and more important, is that it purports to make cycling friendlier and more practical by offering the possibility of doing normal things in fabulous clothes while doing exactly the opposite. Cycling in heels and fedoras is simply not practical in Chicago for anything other than neighborhood jaunts or parades (not that there's anything wrong with either), and people who insist on doing so are cutting themselves off from a lot of what makes riding a bicycle fun and useful. "Cycle chic" is, essentially, a fetish.

What I'm suggesting is that there might be something to a notion of "cycle chic" that actually fits with life as cyclists live it in Chicago—something a bit less sexy, perhaps, than is on offer in certain European cities, but something that is at least our own. So sorry to be of any offense, but there really are places to take out advertisements and some of them don't even cost any money.

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service