An very unscientific poll...

I just wanted to get a quick idea on this so if you could give a quick yes or no I would appreciate it:

Do you, on the bike you commute on or use as daily transport have a suspension fork?

I'm just interested in if you have one or not right now and would prefer this not devolve into a debate making it harder for me to count so if we could just limit it to yes or no and skip the reasons that would be awesome. Afterward I shall give my opinion and we can all argue about it, I promise.

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Moc Artsy on October 18, 2011 at 2:42am

A couple years ago I met the CPD bike cop who also did maintenance on all the CPD bikes. He told me that when the suspension forks on their Treks and Cannondales required service or failed, he simply used the opportunity to replace them with rigid forks.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Wirtz on October 18, 2011 at 2:47am

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shawn Benscoter on October 18, 2011 at 3:32am

i dissaggre. YES it eats enerygy, but my singlw speed dual can STILL him 45 mph, the shocks are great for just keeping moving, stairs, curbs, potholes. and lets not forget about hitting speed humps as jumps

notoriousDUG said:

P.S.

Please feel free to argue about anything and everything regarding suspension ans suspension forks. I'll start.

They suck because they soak up energy, weigh a ton and require extra maintenance.