Tags:
Yay for helmets.
Did you count for crosses worn around the neck, lucky rabbits feet, and other magic talismans?
How about gloves?
Did you count for crosses worn around the neck, lucky rabbits feet, and other magic talismans?
How about gloves?
I saw somebody posted about helmets today and didn't get the joke propounded by a few posters thereafter. It got me thinking about this thread that I had originated a couple years ago and a recent experience...a very positive. one. A couple weeks ago I had to drive to the loop. As usual, traffic was quite congested close in. I sat at a stop light and did a lid count while waiting at Kinzie and LaSalle. I am happy to report that a staggering percentage of riders had helmets. In a few minute period I counted 15/19 riders had helmets. A nice assortments of bikes as well! This very unscientific study demonstrated that lidded riders had nearly doubled in two years.
Fixed
David Barish said:
This very unscientific study demonstrated assumes that lidded riders had nearly doubled in two years.
On the topic of helmets...How often do you replace your helmet?
To even call this a study is an insult to studies world-wide.
This is exact the same discussion about helmets we had last week. One person has certain personal experiences and draws conclusions from it that are clouded by personal preferences.
When do we learn that Opinions + Anecdotal evidence <> Facts?
David Barish said:
I saw somebody posted about helmets today and didn't get the joke propounded by a few posters thereafter. It got me thinking about this thread that I had originated a couple years ago and a recent experience...a very positive. one. A couple weeks ago I had to drive to the loop. As usual, traffic was quite congested close in. I sat at a stop light and did a lid count while waiting at Kinzie and LaSalle. I am happy to report that a staggering percentage of riders had helmets. In a few minute period I counted 15/19 riders had helmets. A nice assortments of bikes as well! This very unscientific study demonstrated that lidded riders had nearly doubled in two years.
But it is a self-described "unscientific study". Like beer goes with pretzels but not with popcorn.
haha!
I hope it was clear that my popcorn comment was made tongue-firmly-planted-in-cheek. I did not get the impression that David's comment were made tongue-in-cheek.
Lisa Curcio 4.0 mi said:
But it is a self-described "unscientific study". Like beer goes with pretzels but not with popcorn.
Althought tongue in cheek is a common place for me to be it was not where I was when I posted. When I saw helmet after helmet pass me by recently, I was surprised. Its difficult to churn any particular result from this anecdotal and (as Lisa observed and I stated)unscientific evidence. However, it led me to believe that perhaps more people are wearing helmets. Whether that's true, to what extent etc is unverifiable and unknown. We are all minor scientists in our lives. We take our little anecdotal studies and then based on what we get we do more study. At that time (not now) we may be able to draw some real conclusions. For now I willl say, "downtown commuters may appear to be wearing helmets in greater proportion than they used to." What will I do with that? I will test the assumption to see if it stands up. I always thought that the phrase "assuming makes an ass of you and me" is a particularly foolish one. We must assume. We test assumptions and we move on. If not, we never learn anything. I agree we can look like an ass if we make assumptions and delude ourselves into thinking they are facts.
As far as last week's discussion, I was only making an observation. I do have a point of view (pro helmet) but that really wasn't on the table here.
Now we will have to see if I saw a surprising variant or a real trend. Keep your eyes open. I might do so on the ride home. Also, as best as I can tell beer goes with everything.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members