The Chainlink

Surprised no one shared this one yet.   I know it's been talked about on numerous discussion threads here.

Smile, driver: You're on candid camera!

When bike and car collide, what ensues is often a lot of finger-pointing, but the facts are often elusive. So some local bikers are taking matters into their own hands.

Alex Wilson, executive director of community bicycle learning workshop West Town Bikes, who also serves on Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel's Bicycle Advisory Council, says bicyclists have started riding with helmet-mounted cameras from GoPro or mounting small recording devices or iPhones to their handlebars, with the intent of documenting bad behavior by cars.

George Chase, store manager of Kozy's Cyclery on North Milwaukee Avenue, says sales of GoPro cameras (which retail for between $200 and $400, depending on the model) have doubled since Mr. Emanuel announced his plans to bring the Divvy bike-share program and miles of bike lanes to the city. “Half of the GoPros we sell are for people to combat road rage,” Mr. Chase said. A GoPro spokesman did not respond to a request for comment, but the company has previously reported that sales of its bike-camera products have doubled over the past year.

Read whole Crains story here.

Views: 747

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

NBC 5 was at WTB today doing a story with our own Lebster Pabon on this subject. Lebster was featured on WYCC's In The Loop program just last week.

There wasn't any signal but that van was already edging right when the rider sped up and tried to get around.  No reason to risk one's neck like that.  I would have just done the whole ride on State rather than mess with all those sidewalks, alleys and an uncontrolled crossing of Congress.

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

Interesting.  Reminds me of this.  It seems everyone in Russia has a dash cam...

No turn signal

Tom Z said:

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

If you were driving a car, the van would have waited for a gap in traffic.

Does that matter? Ride defensively, it's safer.

Davo said:

No turn signal

Tom Z said:

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

I agree, ride defensively. However there still was no indication of what the vehicle was going. This is my biggest pet peeve next to cars blocking intersections. Both of which are illegal. Sorry for the slight derailment of the topic but i wish that motorists were more worried about themselves obeying the law than cyclists doing so.

Tom Z said:

Does that matter? Ride defensively, it's safer.

Davo said:

No turn signal

Tom Z said:

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:


I understand... I wasn't there at the moment, and sometimes it's a lot easier to see things afterwords in a video. If I was there at that very second riding, I can't say, sitting at my computer now, what I would have done.

Stay safe out there...


Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

This.  

My helmet camera caught that rightward drift, which is great for hindsight analysis - but I did not see it in the moment until the van had come in quite close.  At that point, adrenaline kicked in and I just pushed to get past him.

Davo said:

No turn signal

Tom Z said:

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

Cars not signaling make for a no-win situation. If you try to pass them on the left and they go straight, you're stuck on the left of traffic. If you pass them on the right and they turn, you're boned there too. 

(This doesn't even cover when cars signal one way and turn the other) 

It's easy to armchair "well you shoulda dut dut dut" but like most cases where people get blamed for being harmed by others, it doesn't hold to any scrutiny (in addition to being kind of shitty). 

A trick that I have learned is to keep an eye on the front wheel of any vehicle that I am overtaking, when possible. Im not sure if that would have helped in your case but I'd like to pass that info on. 

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

This.  

My helmet camera caught that rightward drift, which is great for hindsight analysis - but I did not see it in the moment until the van had come in quite close.  At that point, adrenaline kicked in and I just pushed to get past him.

Davo said:

No turn signal

Tom Z said:

This rider should have just slowed down and let the van in. Why would you try to out-run the van. If you were driving a car you would have hit the brakes, why is it any different on a bicycle?

Chi Lowe 12.5+ mi said:

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service