NY mayoral hopeful's first act: removing [expletive] bike lanes

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Will on March 5, 2011 at 12:53pm

And the backstory:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/nyregion/06sadik-khan.html?_r=1&a...

It does sound like Bloomberg's transportation commissioner can be abrasive, but it also sounds like she's done a lot of good for the city in a relatively short period of time. The line separating a visionary and a dictator can be very thin sometimes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on March 5, 2011 at 1:20pm

I don't know, but is seems to me this guy is a jerk...

 

;)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Anne Alt on March 5, 2011 at 1:20pm

This is a lesson to learn from this:  work to make enough progress and to sustain progress, but not alienate the morons to the point where later backlash erases all that progress.  Gotta sell the idea to enough people so that there's support to prevent progress from being erased.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr. Doom on March 5, 2011 at 1:58pm

This has NOTHING to do with bicycles. It's all about Bloomberg, who isn't actually a New Yorker, running the city as if the boroughs didn't exist and dictating citywide policy without input from people who actually live in them. The bike lanes are just symbolic. Weiner is a huge dickhead, but he's actually right about the broad point.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alex on March 5, 2011 at 3:09pm

Mr. Doom - You're mostly right, except that Bloomberg is a New Yorker, in that he is an extremely rich person who actually likes to spend most of his time in Bermuda. Also, it's somewhat about bicycles, but more about what bicycles and the accompanying hoo-ha represent. Which I guess you said, too, so I'll stop with that.

 

And Anne, some of those who are opposed to/critical/skeptical of the new bike infrastructure in NYC are not morons (though certainly some are). There are much larger issues at play regarding development and gentrification across the city. We have a lot of the same issues in Chicago, but at a smaller scale than in NYC. 

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on March 5, 2011 at 3:14pm

What do you consider "enough progress?"

Anne Alt said:

This is a lesson to learn from this:  work to make enough progress and to sustain progress, but not alienate the morons to the point where later backlash erases all that progress.  Gotta sell the idea to enough people so that there's support to prevent progress from being erased.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr. Doom on March 5, 2011 at 3:28pm

Well, fair enough. Still it's easy enough to understand why politicians from boroughs the size of Chicago are irritated by having a Bostonian who may or may not know what Woodhaven Boulevard is lording over them. We'd have similar issues if Schaumburg were part of Chicago and Rahm Emanuel was constantly telling the people there that they were embarrassing yokels who should just go away.

Anyone who's irritated by this, by the way, will be amused to know that Weiner's name is pronounced "Ween-ur."

Alex said:

Bloomberg is a New Yorker, in that he is an extremely rich person who actually likes to spend most of his time in Bermuda.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by jennifer james on March 6, 2011 at 9:37pm

The Streetsblog has a commentary running on this as well- it's interesting to read some of the comments from there.http://www.streetsblog.org/2011/03/04/the-new-york-times-jsk-profil...

• ▶ Reply