The Chainlink

So…my Friday night was a wee bit interesting as a Chicago cyclist. My
Friday plan was to check out Sonar, go to a friend’s apartment to
celebrate his thirty-fifth birthday in the West Loop and then finish off
the day at a party I was hosting at Bottom Lounge. Well, one more
event was added to the night – an altercation with a bike thief, which
led to his subsequent arrest and court date. I began the night with
Sonar, which took place at the Chicago Cultural Center for some
avant-garde like ambient music and practically put me to sleep. Then I
rode up to my buddy Paul’s place at about 8:30pm with Joshua and Naaman,
two other friends. All three of us locked our bikes up across the
street at the Staples on Jackson. I locked up my bike with two u-locks
(yes, I know I’m paranoid) and one cheapo squiggly lock. Naaman locked
his bike up with his own squiggly lock and Joshua used his own u-lock
and line and then we also intertwined lines and squigglys. We went
upstairs to the penthouse and had some libations on the deck and headed
out again around 10:00pm. We came out of the building and as we walked
across the street, I noticed there were only two bikes locked up,
instead of three. At that exact moment, a man tried to ride away on my
buddy Naaman’s bike. Naaman yelled out at the dude, “Hey that’s my
bike!”

We surrounded the dude on the bike and, not in the friendliest of ways, removed his body from the bike. He said, “You got
the bike, what do you want?!”

At that point I went into a Viking berserker rage and yelled shit at the guy like, “You bike thief
motherfucker! Fuck you! I’m putting your ass in jail!” He looked at
me like he wanted to fight but I stood my ground. He began walking west
on Jackson and walked out into traffic. I did the same. I don’t know
what came over me but if there is a group of people I can’t stand, it’s
fucking bike thieves. As we were walking in traffic, I called the
police and gave a description of the man as I walked ten feet behind
him. He was getting pissed off and tried to walk into Mr. Greek’s but
since I had already created a scene with all my yelling, the door people
refused him entry as soon as he tried to walk into the restaurant.
Then he sat down in front of the restaurant.

The whole time I screamed bloody murder about him going to jail and how all he is, is a
thief. One of the bike thief’s buddies happened to be right there and
yelled at him and tells him to ,“Run, run, you gotta get out of here!”
His buddy looked at me and said, “He just got out of jail!”

I responded, “He’s a thief, I don’t care!” So the thief decided to head
south on Halsted. I still followed him, causing a commotion in front of
all the Greek Town restaurants and bars in a freaking rage. The guy
turned left down an alley and made another quick left. I followed him
but as I turned the corner, the dude was ready to fight. I guess his
plan was to try and dispatch me in the alley away from the public’s eye
and stop me from following him. He was slow and older and kinda out of
shape, so I was able to easily avoid his attempted assault. I yelled,
“You can’t fucking catch me! You’re old, slow and fat!” We continued
to follow him north through the alley and he tried charging me again and
again as I nimbly avoid his assault.

Six minutes had passed by that point and no CPD. I called 911 again and said the guy had tried to
assault me twice since the first call and told them to hurry. The guy
walked to Jackson again and headed east while I trailed behind him.
Most of the time Joshua was about fifty feet away making sure things
didn’t get hairy while Naaman watched all of our bikes. As the guy went
east on Jackson, he decided to jump down the bridge onto the grass
right near the expressway. In a moment of pure stupidity, this crazy
asshole then ran across two lanes of traffic on 90/94 and dashed under
the viaducts, which was when I made a third call to the police. At that
point I didn’t want to continue to follow him because I feared crossing
the expressway. For Christ’s sake, his fat ass could have pushed my
153 pound body into 90/94 traffic and instead of Little Phil, I would
then be Dead Phil or Flat Phil. He ran around underneath the viaducts
while I stayed above and tried not to lose sight of him.

After about ten minutes, the Chicago Police finally fucking showed up with one
SUV and four squad cars. I pointed to the last place I had seen him
under the bridge and the police followed my direction. The asshole
didn’t move and was caught red-handed. They put him in the SUV and
drove up to the Jackson Bridge where we had gathered. Naaman, Josh and I
were waiting there, with our bikes basking in street justice
vigilantism. The cops asked me to identify the man they caught. The
CPD opened up the car door with the motherfucker inside. All I said to
him was, “Hey, buddy” and he couldn’t even look me in the eye. He knew
he was caught. Ha Ha Ha. After I signed some paperwork and got a court
date set, we were good to go. The dude was charged with stealing two
bikes because he cut my squiggly bike locks and was also on Naaman’s
bike. Since the total value of both bikes added up to over $2000, the
guy is going to jail – without passing go! I can’t wait until October
28, when I get to see this asshole in court – I’m going to wave my
broken bike locks at him when they sentence his ass.

Bike Gang 1. Bike Thief 0 – and going to pound-me-in-the-ass jail.

Views: 565

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yeah, this story does have a slight aftertaste of bummer. I definitely have
respect for Phil's bold actions to get the bike back and I'm glad the story has
a happy ending for him, and that there's one less bike thief on the streets.

On the other hand, it's hard not to feel a little sorry for the guy who's going
back to jail. Nobody forced him to steal bikes for money, but we really have
no idea what this guy's background is and how he found himself in this position.

It's possible he's dealing with addiction, mental illness and other issues most
of us don't have experience with. I'm guessing he was dealt a less-than-stellar
hand in life. Why would anyone choose to become a 40-year-old man snipping
bike cables for cash?

Perhaps a viewing of the film "Bicycle Thieves," where the well-intentioned
protagonist who needs a bike to get to work has his bike stolen, and in turn
attempts to steal a bike so he can feed his family, might put this case in
perspective.

John Greenfield

Marion said:
Wow. This many words and so much enthusiasm for putting a black man back into jail.

I mean, I'm happy for you that you have your bike back, but I wish that was the happy occasion, and not that you put someone back into the prison complex.
I refuse to feel sorry for any thief. Jail is too good for them. I almost wish we used the sharia law method of dealing with thievery. First offense they take a hand. Second offense they take the other hand. Third offense is the head.

And the movie is called Bicycle Thief. It's a good movie and shows the social damage JUST ONE theft can do. Theivery should never be coddled. It should be dealt with harshly. Simple theft does so much damage to people who suffer from poverty. Using poverty as an excuse for theft is backward thinking in my opinion. It's the poor who suffer THE MOST from theft as they can't just go out and buy the item they had stolen again. They have to do without. Property is an extension of your Freedom as it takes WORK to accumulate money with which to buy Property. Stealing someone's property is tantamount to stealing that part of their life that they had to dedicate to earning that money to purchase said property. So stealing from someone is the same as turning them into your slave -forcing them to work and stealing the results of that work. How is that NOT slavery?

No, I don't feel sorry for slavers -or thieves, which I see as the same thing morally.

John Greenfield said:
Yeah, this story does have a slight aftertaste of bummer. I definitely have
respect for Phil's bold actions to get the bike back and I'm glad the story has
a happy ending for him, and that there's one less bike thief on the streets.

On the other hand, it's hard not to feel a little sorry for the guy who's going
back to jail. Nobody forced him to steal bikes for money, but we really have
no idea what this guy's background is and how he found himself in this position.

It's possible he's dealing with addiction, mental illness and other issues most
of us don't have experience with. I'm guessing he was dealt a less-than-stellar
hand in life. Why would anyone choose to become a 40-year-old man snipping
bike cables for cash?

Perhaps a viewing of the film "Bicycle Thieves," where the well-intentioned
protagonist who needs a bike to get to work has his bike stolen, and in turn
attempts to steal a bike so he can feed his family, might put this case in
perspective.

John Greenfield

Marion said:
Wow. This many words and so much enthusiasm for putting a black man back into jail.

I mean, I'm happy for you that you have your bike back, but I wish that was the happy occasion, and not that you put someone back into the prison complex.
ROCK ON!!!
I'm assuming that twist by which you turn history upside down and suggest that if someone steals from you, they make you their 'slave' (wtf, word choice?) is meant to be provocative only, so I won't get into why and how that is ignorant and offensive..but yes, you've made your point about what you think deserves the death penalty, sending out a gentle reminder about what kind of people flourish on internet message boards. Even if they're about alternative transportation.


James Baum said:
I refuse to feel sorry for any thief. Jail is too good for them. I almost wish we used the sharia law method of dealing with thievery. First offense they take a hand. Second offense they take the other hand. Third offense is the head.

And the movie is called Bicycle Thief. It's a good movie and shows the social damage JUST ONE theft can do. Theivery should never be coddled. It should be dealt with harshly. Simple theft does so much damage to people who suffer from poverty. Using poverty as an excuse for theft is backward thinking in my opinion. It's the poor who suffer THE MOST from theft as they can't just go out and buy the item they had stolen again. They have to do without. Property is an extension of your Freedom as it takes WORK to accumulate money with which to buy Property. Stealing someone's property is tantamount to stealing that part of their life that they had to dedicate to earning that money to purchase said property. So stealing from someone is the same as turning them into your slave -forcing them to work and stealing the results of that work. How is that NOT slavery?

No, I don't feel sorry for slavers -or thieves, which I see as the same thing morally.

John Greenfield said:
Yeah, this story does have a slight aftertaste of bummer. I definitely have
respect for Phil's bold actions to get the bike back and I'm glad the story has
a happy ending for him, and that there's one less bike thief on the streets.

On the other hand, it's hard not to feel a little sorry for the guy who's going
back to jail. Nobody forced him to steal bikes for money, but we really have
no idea what this guy's background is and how he found himself in this position.

It's possible he's dealing with addiction, mental illness and other issues most
of us don't have experience with. I'm guessing he was dealt a less-than-stellar
hand in life. Why would anyone choose to become a 40-year-old man snipping
bike cables for cash?

Perhaps a viewing of the film "Bicycle Thieves," where the well-intentioned
protagonist who needs a bike to get to work has his bike stolen, and in turn
attempts to steal a bike so he can feed his family, might put this case in
perspective.

John Greenfield

Marion said:
Wow. This many words and so much enthusiasm for putting a black man back into jail.

I mean, I'm happy for you that you have your bike back, but I wish that was the happy occasion, and not that you put someone back into the prison complex.
James,

The original Italian title of the film is "Ladri di Biciclette" or "Bicycle Thieves,"
although it is often mistranslated as "The Bicycle Thief":
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040522/

The plural was used because the title refers to two thieves:
the one who stole the protagonist's bike, and the protagonist himself,
after his desperation drives him to attempt a bike theft.

Never try to out-snob a snob. ; )

John Greenfield

James Baum said:
I refuse to feel sorry for any thief. Jail is too good for them. I almost wish we used the sharia law method of dealing with thievery. First offense they take a hand. Second offense they take the other hand. Third offense is the head.

And the movie is called Bicycle Thief. It's a good movie and shows the social damage JUST ONE theft can do. Theivery should never be coddled. It should be dealt with harshly. Simple theft does so much damage to people who suffer from poverty. Using poverty as an excuse for theft is backward thinking in my opinion. It's the poor who suffer THE MOST from theft as they can't just go out and buy the item they had stolen again. They have to do without. Property is an extension of your Freedom as it takes WORK to accumulate money with which to buy Property. Stealing someone's property is tantamount to stealing that part of their life that they had to dedicate to earning that money to purchase said property. So stealing from someone is the same as turning them into your slave -forcing them to work and stealing the results of that work. How is that NOT slavery?

No, I don't feel sorry for slavers -or thieves, which I see as the same thing morally.

John Greenfield said:
Yeah, this story does have a slight aftertaste of bummer. I definitely have
respect for Phil's bold actions to get the bike back and I'm glad the story has
a happy ending for him, and that there's one less bike thief on the streets.

On the other hand, it's hard not to feel a little sorry for the guy who's going
back to jail. Nobody forced him to steal bikes for money, but we really have
no idea what this guy's background is and how he found himself in this position.

It's possible he's dealing with addiction, mental illness and other issues most
of us don't have experience with. I'm guessing he was dealt a less-than-stellar
hand in life. Why would anyone choose to become a 40-year-old man snipping
bike cables for cash?

Perhaps a viewing of the film "Bicycle Thieves," where the well-intentioned
protagonist who needs a bike to get to work has his bike stolen, and in turn
attempts to steal a bike so he can feed his family, might put this case in
perspective.

John Greenfield

Marion said:
Wow. This many words and so much enthusiasm for putting a black man back into jail.

I mean, I'm happy for you that you have your bike back, but I wish that was the happy occasion, and not that you put someone back into the prison complex.
What Phil did was right and I'm glade he caught this guy...

There is a sad part to it, this guy MIGHT want to go to jail, he could be homeless and a few months in jail in the winter might be what he needs....do I feel bad that this guy , MAY go to jail? I am mixed, he won't learn anything there, except to be a better theif, when he comes out he will be (probably) more bitter and filled with anger. In an ideal world this guy would go to jail, get some counciling, get some education, and come out reformed and learn not to do that again, but that wont happen. This is IF he even goes to jail....
Of course who knows, or really cares about this thiefs background, yeah it could have sucked, but he also could have come from a great family and just turned out to be a jerk...

Maybe a little street justice would have been better....

Phil, I hope you follow this through, but really don't expect too much
John,

It seems you are right -but so was I.

From the original Italian the title is translated in English to "Bicycle Thieves."

In the USA, when the movie was first released here, the title was The Bicycle Thief. I saw it many years ago and that was the title. When I rented it from Netflix 2 or 3 years ago that was still the title on the DVD itself, and all the extras within the disk.

I wasn't aware that it was recently marketed in English under the title The Bicycle Thieves in the USA. I learn something new every day. Thanks!



John Greenfield said:
James,
The original Italian title of the film is "Ladri di Biciclette" or "Bicycle Thieves," although it is often mistranslated as "The Bicycle Thief":
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040522/

The plural was used because the title refers to two thieves:
the one who stole the protagonist's bike, and the protagonist himself,
after his desperation drives him to attempt a bike theft.

Never try to out-snob a snob. ; )

John Greenfield
So, I was thinking about this, and started wondering what the thief actually used to cut the cables, and if that tool was sighted at all, or if there was none apparent, what may have happened to it . . .
I wanted to start a new thread, but I just figured screw it. I found some black dude at the end of my block hammering a u lock of a cannondale missing the front wheel. I was riding by and asked, 'is that yours ?' Of course he said yes, I lost my key and gave a nice big smile. I did not think anything of it and then a few blocks later I turned around and went back, the bike was gone, he was gone and the owner of the bike was out there wondering where his bike went. I told him it was just taken, I rode around and found the guy. The bike was not on him, but I stopped him and told him he took that bike and the owner was pissed. Of course there is not one cop to be seen by Foster and Clark, I am not gonna call 911 because the cops suck big time and I never have a good experience with the 911 call centers. The bike did look abandoned but I did tell him he should not have taken it and the owner was upset and that he was being a thief. He then became offended and aggressive and although I did stand my ground I was still pretty scared cause I was not a match for his size or angry disposition. I feel like a real pussy and now he know who I am, close to where I live and I am the guy on the tallbike. He was very personable until I called him out and I know in his mind it was just a junk bike. I am a little upset over this. I think I made a bad call confronting him. I know the police would have never showed. I am sorry, I just am not in the mood to fight and get my teeth knocked out knowing I am only standing up for a crappy bike. FUKKKKKKK!!!!!!
You aren't kidding that you are persistent!

:-D

H3N3 said:
So, I was thinking about this, and started wondering what the thief actually used to cut the cables, and if that tool was sighted at all, or if there was none apparent, what may have happened to it . . .
Nothing wrong with wanting details on how a theft was carried out.

James Baum said:
You aren't kidding that you are persistent!

:-D

H3N3 said:
So, I was thinking about this, and started wondering what the thief actually used to cut the cables, and if that tool was sighted at all, or if there was none apparent, what may have happened to it . . .
No, I agree, there is nothing wrong with it. I also would like more information on this. But I also think it is funny. He said he wasn't going away and he carried through with it! The internet is for laughing and humor and snark (and maybe pr0n). Howard makes me laugh (in a good way).

Tank-Ridin' Ryan said:
Nothing wrong with wanting details on how a theft was carried out.

James Baum said:
You aren't kidding that you are persistent!

:-D

H3N3 said:
So, I was thinking about this, and started wondering what the thief actually used to cut the cables, and if that tool was sighted at all, or if there was none apparent, what may have happened to it . . .

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service