I saw one of the stop sign stings for bikers this morning on Wells Street. It was pretty obvious as to what it was, but people were still blowing through the stop sign.
Anyone here get caught? Any thoughts on this?
One thing that I thought was funny was this girl who passed me while I was stopping, and then was flagged over and still tried to go. The police stepped in front of her...it looked like she was going to make a break for it, but she ended up stopping.
Tags:
(SORT OF OFF TOPIC) Dug,
I'm not sure if you know this but Anarchism has a long history of being a legitimate non-authoritarian truly democratic model for political organizating. The lack of law is not Anarchism. For further explanation click the links or watch this:
And it has actually existed as a model in our history most dramatically in the 1936 Spainish Revolution where there was a real Anarchist soceity,
They don't cover this in the video but the reason the Anarchists revolution was crushed wasn't due to an internal failure. In fact the new model of organization ended up being far more productive than anywhere else Europe at the time. Rather than ending by internal failure the revolution was subverted by an agreement between the Capitalists and Communists to no longer supply the Catalonia region with steel for bullets. When they cut of the supply they put a nose around the neck of the revolution.
Cars suck, and if there weren't so many, we wouldn't need all these stop signs.
I have a hard time being convinced that in an all-bike or mostly-bike city, fewer road controls would be needed. IMO, the basic need for traffic control would carry over from cars to bikes; unsafe, irresponsible operators.
Sorry, I'm really not trying to be sarcastic, but - WTF are you talking about? What is a "minor fender bender" on a bicycle, and how would it kill anyone? Unless you're talking about a collision WITH A CAR, which I would call a car crash. I certainly wouldn't call a fatal crash a "fender bender."A minor fender bender for a motorist can result in death for a bicyclist.
(SORT OF OFF TOPIC) Dug,
I'm not sure if you know this but Anarchism has a long history of being a legitimate non-authoritarian truly democratic model for political organizating. The lack of law is not Anarchism. For further explanation click the links or watch this:
And it has actually existed as a model in our history most dramatically in the 1936 Spainish Revolution where there was a real Anarchist soceity,
They don't cover this in the video but the reason the Anarchists revolution was crushed wasn't due to an internal failure. In fact the new model of organization ended up being far more productive than anywhere else Europe at the time. Rather than ending by internal failure the revolution was subverted by an agreement between the Capitalists and Communists to no longer supply the Catalonia region with steel for bullets. When they cut of the supply they put a nose around the neck of the revolution.
And finally this nice music break...
notoriousDUG said:There will be less but they still need to be there and I am just taking it to an extreme to make a point.
I support the bicycle rolling stop for side streets, stop signs and the like as well as treating signals like stop signs or a yield. It is an issue of city planning and the cities have already been planned and society has been programed and if we want to change the standard plan in the future and update societies programing the 'CARS SUCK!' 'FUCK THE COPS!' 'YOUR EVIL IF YOU DRIVE!' rhetoric needs to stop, people need to respect drivers and otherwise put goodwill out there to help convert people.
I think you're confusing communication within a relatively like-minded community with an advocacy effort (this is where I'm supposed to use the word "ignorant" by your protocol, I think, but I don't think you are). Just because someone expresses here that cars need to go away, are the root of many of our problems, adversely affect the quality of life in our city, should come with a cost for use adequate to offset the cost to society etc., doesn't mean they're going to make a similar announcement in the lunch line at work, or at their family picnic. In fact, most of us don't have the freedom to do so in such situations, so one of the things we participate in a message board like this for is to be able to express such views without being bullied into submission.
Why not try to be a little more tolerant of the message that cars NTGA? Why is it so threatening to you? Why do you feel such a strong need to take this forum away from us?
What would happen if you swapped Mr. Yuck out for a smiley face? Can we try it, just for one day at least?
Arguing on the internet is pointless and I am sick of seeing this same conversation over and over again.
So let's man up and change the conversation to something more productive like, "What can be done?" If you're on the side of the argument that says the laws should be changed to account for the unique characteristics of bicycle riding then the first step would be to determine which organizations already exist in Illinois who are like minded or are actively trying to implement something like the Idaho Stop. Once that is determined those of us who have the gumption should then create a committee to try and change the bicycling laws in Illinois to be more reasonable. To do this we would have to either integrate or align ourselves with the various organizations already determined. We'll have to raise money and begin lobbying politicians. This isn't an unreasonable proposal either, after all, we are talking about bike law. It's do-able. So who wants to change some laws?
PS. Nothing wins an Internet fight like actually doing something in the real world to affect change. It pisses your naysayers off far more than anything you could possibly do online. It's possibly the number two reason I am so politically active. ; )
America's traffic death rates are three to four times higher than in Denmark or the Netherlands, and urban cycling rates there are 30 or 40 times higher -- but stop signs are incredibly rare in both countries. Stoplights, in my experience, are comparatively rare and yield signs are commonplace. I described cycling across Copenhagen recently as "an effortless revelation" since you really don't think all that much about stopping. The big streets are timed for bike travel, and there isn't very much car traffic to yield for since everyone's on a bike and taking that much less space. The mass transit network is plush but not at all frequent and kind of underutilized.
This has nothing to do with having exceptionally law-abiding and polite societies, either; per capita, more total crimes are actually reported to the police in either country than in the USA. Nor are these theoretical constructs: they're functioning places (Danes are the world's happiest people!) that are just about as rich as us, it's just that they're much less likely to violently die. Why do Americans continue to put up with this bloodshed?
Vando said:I have a hard time being convinced that in an all-bike or mostly-bike city, fewer road controls would be needed. IMO, the basic need for traffic control would carry over from cars to bikes; unsafe, irresponsible operators.
It seems out of place coming from me but if people stopped being so full of hate and were willing to give a little ground, compromise and have realistic expectations of what changes can actually be made right now it would be easier to enact change.
262 members
203 members
269 members
63 members
172 members