Tags:
As soon as I saw this new design for a separated bike lane, I thought it was more dangerous than a regular bike lane next to traffic. There is no escape route if something unexpected happens in front of you. I'd rather ride next to traffic than be confined between a curb and a row of car doors. This design is dnangerous - whether it's on the left side or the right side. BTW - the bike lane in NYC is on the left because the bus lane is on the right. That's the same reason the bike lane on Dearborn is on the left side of the street.
David,
there are a variety of perspectives offered in this video, by people of obviously diverse experience and knowledge-- and also a variety of specific problems outlined.
Of course I watch it critically and make a judgment as to the veracity of each claim just like you do-- no idea why you're trying to reduce this to one or two points of minutia, and/or present things as if I would just swallow what any random person who gets in front of a camera might say, uncritically.
There's a clear theme that comes across-- the bike lane does not work for the riding style of the majority of people interviewed, who are just interested in passing through the space quickly on their way from A to B.
Curious-- are you David Gleason?
David said:I'm curious, what exactly do you think is poorly-designed about this particular lane? The separated bike lane, with bikes between the car and the sidewalk, is pretty common in Europe, so it's not a new idea. The claim is made by one person in the video that the lane should have been on the right because more cars turn left on 1st ave., but there's no solid numbers to back up that claim. And city officials have reported that there's been a 50% reduction in injuries to street users with the new bike lane, a pretty significant spike in safety.
The fact that somebody is complaining just isn't evidence that the planners are "half-awake bean counters." That's a pretty harsh charge against people who are working hard for cyclists.
H3N3 said:Glad someone took the time to speak out about this.
I would not take it as a condemnation of all bike lanes but of one poorly-designed example.
Two problems jump out here:
1) Where bike lanes and bike paths are placed, driver intolerance of any cyclist not in that lane or on that path spikes to dangerous levels.
2) When bicyclists get planning or advocacy jobs, they frequently lose their enthusiasm for the cause of bicycling and morph into the type of half-awake bean counters that let this particular mistake happen.
My two cents is that this video was pretty well done...it includes lots of actual experience (video of riding in this particular lane) and several users opinions. Some techie (knows how to edit film on a computer) should put some informative pieces together similar to this regarding are cycling challenges in Chicago. This was done in a way that it was not overly critical of the system but showed major concern for new developments in the New York metro area to assist cyclists. Basically informative and a good attempt to bring to light opposition to current design. In my opinion, this is good news reporting that could help our community.
It is also my personal opinion that bike lanes don't always work and that it allows drivers an argument as to how cyclists should share the road. I am of the school that I pay taxes, I live here, I have the same right to road. So move over you gas loving piece of @#*^s.....go kill another American for greed!
Please do not respond to my extreme over the top behavior posting....unless your nuts like me!
I think the key to solving all these problems will be reversible high speed bike lanes to cover the rush hour traffic.
I may not be a traffic engineer, but I am an experienced commuter who has learned to expect the unexpected in order to stay safe. The video does a great job of showing how what might look good on paper doesn't always work out so well in the real world.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members