As mentioned in another thread, Mayor-elect Emanuel has said he'd like to see our 311 system improved.
I'd like to see more complete map info provided to 311 operators. Those of us who ride the Major Taylor Trail and Burnham Greenway on the far south side have to go through a laborious process to give accurate locations when reporting graffiti or other issues via 311 because these trails are NOT in the 311 system. There are other potential trails in the works that would likely have the same problem under the current system.
If someone was making a 911 call from a trail, they might have a problem with delayed response, although GPS-enabled phones might alleviate this somewhat.
What changes would you like to see?
Tags:
That's a good suggestion. The city actually had a tracking # system until last year, when they quietly eliminated it among a flurry of budget cuts. Under the old system, you had to request the # if you made your 311 report by phone. If you made a report through the city's web site, the confirmation e-mail sent to you would automatically contain the tracking #. That's how I discovered that they'd eliminated it. The confirmation messages no longer had tracking #s.
It would be great to see these re-introduced.
notoriousDUG said:
The ability to track what happens to your complaint. As in a run down of who/what department the complaint is passed on to and what they did with it. When I call my ISP, cell provider or any other customer service line they assign me a trouble ticket number and track the response to my complaint; is it to much to ask that the city give me the same level of service as Verizon?
I have doubts about the tracking number being eliminated.
It's called the SR number, for Service Request.
Even if the emails no longer include the SR number, a unique number identifying the record of your request still exists (it has to, it's a database).
I can see many other reasons for not automatically providing people with the SR number over email. The first being that if you don't know it, you won't follow-up, reducing pressure to complete the task (yes, I realize this sounds awful and what a bad government might do).
What I would like to see
I can see many other reasons for not automatically providing people with the SR number over email. The first being that if you don't know it, you won't follow-up, reducing pressure to complete the task (yes, I realize this sounds awful and what a bad government might do).
That is *exactly* why I think they eliminated it. Around the same time, I started noticing that voice menu systems for some city departments were changed to make it nearly impossible to reach a person unless the caller already knows the extension.
I like your suggestions, especially the idea about allowing submissions for ALL category types in a more user friendly way.
If I'm reporting potholes (and I often have a bunch to report after a spring bike ride), I tend to report them in bunches. This makes it more efficient to report online, but at the cost of no longer getting a tracking #.
If I do a bunch of them in a row, I can make several reports in 5 minutes or less using the online form. If I call in, it sometimes takes me that long just to be directed to the appropriate person.
After being put on hold for 20 minutes last time I called 311 I pretty much wont call anymore.
The online system as it is needs to allows for locations without exact or known addresses (ie undeveloped areas, trails, etc). A smartphone app that allows me to upload GPS location, problem and a photo or a user friendly mobile website would the best way to get me reporting more.
Anne Alt said:
If I'm reporting potholes (and I often have a bunch to report after a spring bike ride), I tend to report them in bunches. This makes it more efficient to report online, but at the cost of no longer getting a tracking #.
If I do a bunch of them in a row, I can make several reports in 5 minutes or less using the online form. If I call in, it sometimes takes me that long just to be directed to the appropriate person.
203 members
1 member
270 members
1 member
261 members