The Chainlink

Bobby Cann Updates: Ryne San Hamel Pleads Guilty, Receives 10 Days in Jail

Jason Jenkins at ActiveTrans is helping to coordinate community response.  If there is any chance you can attend proceedings, please reach out to him: 

jason@activetrans.org.

 

Views: 43852

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Catherine Bullard on October 2, 2013 at 9:45am

Judge William Hooks is presiding over the case. He was assigned to it at the arraignment but was not present that day, so another judge stood in. He's directly presided over the past two pre-trial hearings and will continue to hear the case for its duration.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 3, 2013 at 8:30am

A more thorough coverage of the trial is available at http://chi.streetsblog.org from the Oct 2nd issue by John Greenfield.  A lot more information in this article than seems to be coming from elsewhere.

Thanks, Catherine, for the judge's name. Thanks for including the link to information about Judge Hooks.

The next hearing will be Monday, October 7th, Rm. 301 at 26th and California. Time TBD but probably 10:00 a.m. John's article says the time will be at 10:00 AM.

Permalink Reply by Crazy David 84 Furlongs on October 3, 2013 at 9:15am

I would hope that some "unofficial" watch is being kept on this guy to find out if he is actually driving.   Sadly, often folks with suspended licenses continue to drive because the system doesn't usually catch them.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 3, 2013 at 2:13pm

The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer

http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...

Another posting on the subject.

It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.

Permalink Reply by Kevin C Dormant on October 3, 2013 at 2:32pm

Yeah, this blog update just arrived by carrier pigeon...

Bob Kastigar said:

The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer

http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...

Another posting on the subject.

It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 3, 2013 at 6:47pm


h' 1.0 said:

What is the relevance of this old blog post with no updates to Crazy David Furlong's question?

What was the question, I can't seem to find it mousing back thru the list.

Are you OK, Bob?

I'm fine, thank you for asking.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 8, 2013 at 11:11am

Any information on the court appearance on Monday, 10/7 at 10 AM?

Was there a court appearance?

What was brought up?

What was decided by Judge Hooks?

Is there a future court date scheduled?

Permalink Reply by Kevin C Dormant on October 8, 2013 at 12:17pm

Bob. If you have such an immediate need for updates regarding the progress of this judicial proceeding, why don't you show up for these court dates?

Bob Kastigar said:

Any information on the court appearance on Monday, 10/7 at 10 AM?

Was there a court appearance?

What was brought up?

What was decided by Judge Hooks?

Is there a future court date scheduled?

Permalink Reply by Davo on October 8, 2013 at 1:38pm

Also the picture at the top of the page looks a little blurry. Kind of ironic for a dui lawyer.

Kevin C said:

Yeah, this blog update just arrived by carrier pigeon...

Bob Kastigar said:

The blog of Harold L. Wallin, Illinois DUI Lawyer

http://illinoisduilawyer.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/allyoucandrink-co...

Another posting on the subject.

It seems as if a lot of "unofficial" watch is being kept and as we find it we should make it more available to all.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 8, 2013 at 7:55pm

Kevin C said:Bob. If you have such an immediate need for updates regarding the progress of this judicial proceeding, why don't you show up for these court dates?

Thank you for your very useful response and update information.  You were being very helpful.

I'm sure there are other users such as me looking for information that other would like to share, since many or most of us following this are unable to attend the court proceeding due to other things to do in our lives.

Just because we don't show up doesn't mean we aren't interested in Ryne Sanhamel, while allegedly driving drunk with an alleged Blood-Alcohol level of .127 allegedly drove into and allegedly killed cyclist Bobby Cann.

Permalink Reply by Bob Kastigar on October 8, 2013 at 7:58pm



Sarah D. 1-3.3 said:

+1 jesus god

You, too, are supplying very useful information and a most appropriate comment.

You must be happy to be in the inner group.

Permalink Reply by Alex Z on October 8, 2013 at 8:35pm

Bob, the snarky comments likely are more in response to your tone than in response to your actual requests for information. You are coming across as somewhat entitled.

RSS

Groups

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service