Crains Chicago Business Article - "Carless is the New Cool"
Meet Will Sharp, 31 years old, suburbanite and new dad. Also, he's carless. One in four Chicago households has no vehicle, double the number from 2000. Other data show Millennials are going without cars -- some, like Mr. Sharp, by choice. Read about it in Crain's.
Is Will a Chainlinker?
Millennials forgoing car ownership
July 30, 2012
Photo by: Erik Unger
Will Sharp is your typical suburbanite. The Barrington resident is married with a 10-month-old son and commutes 40 miles every day to his retail job in Lincoln Park.
Except he does it without a car.
Mr. Sharp, 31, moved to the Chicago area in 2009 from New York, where he and his wife, Rebecca, found car ownership both unaffordable and impractical. Now, he says, he could buy one, but rather than making monthly car payments and paying for gas, tolls and parking, he prefers saving the money for a down payment on a house one day.
“We're renting at the moment, and it's basically a decision of car ownership versus home ownership,” he says. So he relies on a combination of the Metra commuter train, the Chicago Transit Authority, friends' and relatives' cars, the occasional rental—and his own two feet. “I walk five miles a day. That's the only exercise I get as a new father.”
Among millennials, the love affair with the automobile is turning chilly. For previous generations, car ownership was a rite of passage that often coincided with receiving a driver's license at age 16. The equation was simple: wheels equal freedom. But because of philosophical and practical concerns, fewer in this recession-socked generation are driving their own vehicles. They're also enabled by the growth of rental outfits such as Cambridge, Mass.-based ZipCar Inc. and Chicago nonprofit I-Go Car Sharing and, for those who've moved back home, mom and dad.
After about 50 minutes on the train, Mr. Sharp arrives at Clybourn Avenue and walks a mile to his job. Photos by Erik Unger
One in four households within the city limits has no vehicle, according to 2010 U.S. Census information, compared with less than 10 percent of households across the country. That's nearly double the 14 percent of Chicago households that were carless in 2000.
CAR OWNERSHIP DECLINING
Nationally, the average annual number of vehicle-miles traveled by people ages 16 to 34 dropped 23 percent, to 7,900 from 10,300, between 2001 and 2009, according to the federal government's National Household Travel Survey.
Today, only 22 percent of drivers are 20-somethings or teenagers, down from a third in 1983, according to a 2011 study by the University of Michigan. Further, more than half of all drivers in 1983 were under age 40, but today that number has fallen to less than 40 percent, declining faster than this age cohort's share of the U.S. population.
Liz Granger, 25, grew up in Omaha, Neb., smack in the middle of car culture. She got her license at 16 and drove until she went to Northwestern University in 2005. Since graduating, she has spent time in Uganda on a Fulbright scholarship, walking everywhere, and now commutes via bike from her Pilsen apartment to an internship and job as a yoga instructor in the Loop.
Ms. Granger figures that, at most, just 20 percent of her friends from college own cars. One of her former roommates received a car for graduation and eventually sent it back to her parents' after dealing with the headaches of city driving.
“Down the road, I will need a car,” Ms. Granger says, “but I'm happy to delay the purchase as long as possible.” She says that cargo biking gear, which allows riders to haul loads of groceries and other goods on their bikes, plus car-sharing services, are delaying that purchase even longer.
“We have this American idea about cars as freedom,” says Jason Rothstein, a 40-year-old West Town resident who gave up his car eight years ago, after his third driver's-side mirror was knocked off in a six-week span. “But a car comes with a lot of financial responsibility and other burdens.”
Mr. Rothstein, a public health project manager at the University of Illinois at Chicago and author of “Carless in Chicago,” mostly takes public transportation, rides his bike or walks to get around. Trips may take longer, but he says he is free of credit card debt today largely because of his choice. He calculates that owning a car cost him $7,600 a year. According to the U.S. Census, Chicagoans who ride public transit to work rather than drive save $1,016 a month, more than the $843 national average.
“Particularly when you're at the age where you're trying to make ends meet, it makes a substantial difference in your quality of life,” Mr. Rothstein says. “It may be the difference between affording tuition or taking advantage of all the great restaurants in Chicago or taking a vacation.”
There are consequences, to be sure. Mr. Sharp says his wife, a stay-at-home mother, sometimes feels trapped within a walking-distance radius. And carless people acknowledge that shopping runs require extra planning and can be a pain. But they also generally say inconveniences are far outweighed by the benefits of saving money and the environment.
This mindset shift is affecting city planning and local businesses.
Gabe Klein, commissioner of the Chicago Department of Transportation, predicts that bike traffic in Chicago will quadruple in the next five years, partly because of an ambitious citywide program that calls for 10,000 bike-share bicycles and 100 miles of protected bike lanes by 2020.
Meanwhile I-Go has grown by nearly 25 percent this year in terms of members, usage and number of cars. CEO Sharon Feigon says her company has 15,000 to 20,000 members who share a fleet of about 300 cars.
The members' ages range widely, she says, but tend to skew toward people in their 30s who have committed to long-term city living. I-Go research shows that members pay about $3,500 annually for the membership, public transportation passes and the occasional taxi, whereas car owners spend at least twice that.
Scott Klocksin, 29, a Wilmette native who spent a year and a half as a New York bike messenger, says one of the biggest gains of going carless isn't financial.
“If you bike, you establish a sense of connection between the locales of your daily life that isn't possible via other modes of transport,” he says. “It's you, 180 degrees of peripheral vision and the streetscape—and it fundamentally changes your relationship with the city.”
From this week's Business of Life
Read more: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20120728/ISSUE03/307289990/m...
Stay on top of Chicago business with our free daily e-newsletters
Views: 1217
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Julie Aberman (Hochstadter) on
-
And a user comment is actually funny!
Seth B. wrote:Nobody tell him about the Apple store in Deerfield ;-)
-
Permalink Reply by Duppie on
-
This guy sums it up nicely:
Scott Klocksin, 29, a Wilmette native who spent a year and a half as a New York bike messenger, says one of the biggest gains of going carless isn't financial.
“If you bike, you establish a sense of connection between the locales of your daily life that isn't possible via other modes of transport,” he says. “It's you, 180 degrees of peripheral vision and the streetscape—and it fundamentally changes your relationship with the city.”
-
Permalink Reply by Matt on
-
That trip down Lake-Cook Road from Barrington to Deefield has no public transit component. Google Maps tells me he would have to take the Metra downtown and change to Milwaukee North Line to go back out.
If he could load his bike on Metra, he could take a 10-minutes ride to Arlington Park, followed by a potentially nice bike ride down New Wilke Road and the woods, and maybe report for work within 45 minutes of leaving home, but if the weather makes the roads impassible, he would be screwed.
Julie Hochstadter said:And a user comment is actually funny!
Seth B. wrote:Nobody tell him about the Apple store in Deerfield ;-)
-
Permalink Reply by Jared on
-
I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
-
I wonder what crazy scheme Judge Doom and the automobile manufacturers will come up with to thwart this movement? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OquSczOMkO4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_Streetcar_Scandal
-
-
He's a dad! Schools! Cheap spacious homes!
1. Have kids
2. Move to suburbs.
Doesn't happen every time, but happens a lot.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
-
They rent and the kids 10 months old.
Matt Gilbert said:He's a dad! Schools! Cheap spacious homes!
1. Have kids
2. Move to suburbs.
Doesn't happen every time, but happens a lot.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
Permalink Reply by Far'arned Retrogrumpalunkus #63 on
-
You and me both. Perhaps it has something to do with childcare options available to this couple. Maybe they know someone like a relative that is already living there who can take care of the kid(s). But wouldn't it be easier to live closer to work, or work closer to where you live? He works Retail -do they not have retail jobs in Barrington? Is Barrington that much cheaper to live than Lincoln Park? How much does 3+ hours/day commuting cost someone in their life? Time is money -public transit or not.
Being carless is much easier in the city I would think. I can't imagine living more than a half mile from an L-stop or at least a Metra station. But spending that much time walking to/from a train + riding it seems crazy to me (so does driving a car.)
A bicycle would help a lot in cutting down his walking time. In the city if you pick a good neighborhood you can get away without even having a bike. Walkability is important to me although it looks like Barrington isn't the worst place as far as walkability is concerned.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
-
Its closer to four hours a day commuting. I'd imagine rentals in Barrington are cheaper, but he could always live somewhere in between and spend less time and money on commuting. Living on the far northwest side for example would save him about $100 a month for a Metra pass.
James BlackHeron said:You and me both. Perhaps it has something to do with childcare options available to this couple. Maybe they know someone like a relative that is already living there who can take care of the kid(s). But wouldn't it be easier to live closer to work, or work closer to where you live? He works Retail -do they not have retail jobs in Barrington? Is Barrington that much cheaper to live than Lincoln Park? How much does 3+ hours/day commuting cost someone in their life? Time is money -public transit or not.
Being carless is much easier in the city I would think. I can't imagine living more than a half mile from an L-stop or at least a Metra station. But spending that much time walking to/from a train + riding it seems crazy to me (so does driving a car.)
A bicycle would help a lot in cutting down his walking time. In the city if you pick a good neighborhood you can get away without even having a bike. Walkability is important to me although it looks like Barrington isn't the worst place as far as walkability is concerned.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
-
Agreed.
How much does 3-4 hours/day cost in childcare expenses over a month? This is why I think that the choice of Barrington has more do with finding cheap/good childcare due to knowing someone there than anything else.
Why do people do anything? It's hard to know all the intimate details that leads to a decision like this. Maybe the guy just likes walking, riding the train alone, and avoiding hanging around the house for most of the day? Who knows?
Some people just love living in the 'burbs. Seems strange, but it's true.
Jared said:Its closer to four hours a day commuting. I'd imagine rentals in Barrington are cheaper, but he could always live somewhere in between and spend less time and money on commuting. Living on the far northwest side for example would save him about $100 a month for a Metra pass.
James BlackHeron said:You and me both. Perhaps it has something to do with childcare options available to this couple. Maybe they know someone like a relative that is already living there who can take care of the kid(s). But wouldn't it be easier to live closer to work, or work closer to where you live? He works Retail -do they not have retail jobs in Barrington? Is Barrington that much cheaper to live than Lincoln Park? How much does 3+ hours/day commuting cost someone in their life? Time is money -public transit or not.
Being carless is much easier in the city I would think. I can't imagine living more than a half mile from an L-stop or at least a Metra station. But spending that much time walking to/from a train + riding it seems crazy to me (so does driving a car.)
A bicycle would help a lot in cutting down his walking time. In the city if you pick a good neighborhood you can get away without even having a bike. Walkability is important to me although it looks like Barrington isn't the worst place as far as walkability is concerned.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
-
Permalink Reply by Richard on
-
Good deal! My family -- including a four year old -- has been car free since 1999. We've lived in Washington, DC, Cambridge, MA, and now Chicago.
-
-
I think the article said his wife was a stay at home mom. I suppose they could have family out there.
James BlackHeron said:Agreed.
How much does 3-4 hours/day cost in childcare expenses over a month? This is why I think that the choice of Barrington has more do with finding cheap/good childcare due to knowing someone there than anything else.
Why do people do anything? It's hard to know all the intimate details that leads to a decision like this. Maybe the guy just likes walking, riding the train alone, and avoiding hanging around the house for most of the day? Who knows?
Some people just love living in the 'burbs. Seems strange, but it's true.
Jared said:Its closer to four hours a day commuting. I'd imagine rentals in Barrington are cheaper, but he could always live somewhere in between and spend less time and money on commuting. Living on the far northwest side for example would save him about $100 a month for a Metra pass.
James BlackHeron said:You and me both. Perhaps it has something to do with childcare options available to this couple. Maybe they know someone like a relative that is already living there who can take care of the kid(s). But wouldn't it be easier to live closer to work, or work closer to where you live? He works Retail -do they not have retail jobs in Barrington? Is Barrington that much cheaper to live than Lincoln Park? How much does 3+ hours/day commuting cost someone in their life? Time is money -public transit or not.
Being carless is much easier in the city I would think. I can't imagine living more than a half mile from an L-stop or at least a Metra station. But spending that much time walking to/from a train + riding it seems crazy to me (so does driving a car.)
A bicycle would help a lot in cutting down his walking time. In the city if you pick a good neighborhood you can get away without even having a bike. Walkability is important to me although it looks like Barrington isn't the worst place as far as walkability is concerned.
Jared said:I can't say I'd want to live in Barrington without a car. I'm sort of curious as to why he lives there at all.
Groups
-
Critical Mass discussion
262 members
-
Chicagoland Beer Explora…
203 members
-
Chicago Randonneurs
269 members
-
Walk Bike Transit
63 members
-
British Bicycles of Chic…
172 members
© 2008-2016 The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.
Powered by
