Did anyone read this article in the Sun-Times? Drivers are the New Smokers in City
This isn't in the opinion section, it's under the news section.
Sun-Times Link here.
While driving home Tuesday along the Mayor Emanuel Bike Path — formerly known as Kinzie Street — a chubby guy on a bicycle wearing plaid shorts swerved from his “protected lane” in front of my car. I honked. He extended a certain finger in my direction. I got a bit riled up.
I did not give in to road rage and run him down with my station wagon.
Still, that moment was extra irritating because the goofy street reconfiguration project championed by our new bicycling mayor — who probably uses it as a shortcut to the posh East Bank Club — has bugged me for weeks.
From the curb there’s a wide bike lane, then a barrier of flexible plastic posts, spots for parked cars and, finally, a skinny lane for moving automobiles. At the Kinzie and Milwaukee stoplight, there’s a section of green painted concrete for cyclists to wait out red lights. And it’s in front of cars so drivers have to wait for the pedaling to begin.
The whole thing is awkward, if not unnecessary, and probably just as dangerous as cycling on a street without the elaborate and hideous markings.
Besides, the new bike lanes ruin a driving shortcut through River North. This particular stretch of Kinzie now gets inexplicably backed up with cars while a handful of folks on two wheels zoom by unaffected. Parking used to be prohibited on this stretch of Kinzie during the evening rush — 4 to 6 p.m. — so drivers could use both lanes to escape downtown for the expressways.
Now, Kinzie is a parking lot with bike lanes during those hours.
What’s worse is that the Mayor Emanuel Bike Path seems to have empowered cyclists with a sense of lane entitlement. What happened to sharing the road?
The worst of the cyclists — daredevil bicycle messengers, antique Schwinn-riding hipsters and arrogant office workers on hybrid mountain bikes — fly through stop signs, narrowly miss gastro-wagon patrons and swerve instead of stop for pedestrians.
And that’s just while I’ve been watching.
I’m not just being a crank about a minor traffic jam and a jerk on a bike. What worries me is what the great bicycle takeover of Kinzie Street might mean for the future.
Last week, city Transportation Department spokesman Brian Steele put it this way: “The goal behind this is to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic and increase the amount of bike traffic.”
I’ll put it another way: Drivers are the new smokers.
City and state leaders want to snuff us out, too. First with increased fees and taxes, and now with restrictions on where we can drive. Sound familiar, smokers?
In the last few years, the fees for city stickers, license plate renewal, gas taxes and even moving violation fines — which help pay for paving and repairing roads — have significantly increased. If you drive an SUV in Chicago, for instance, the price of your city sticker went from $75 to $120. Now, starting with this section of Kinzie, nearly a third of the road has been set aside for a pesky pedaling minority who take to the streets for only a part of the year.
Radical bicycle-riding advocates certainly will push to expand Emanuel’s segregated Bike Path system — and ruin every side-street shortcut for city drivers.
Some bicycle commuters are drooling at the prospect of a side-street bicycle takeover.
“Give me an entire street and I’ll be happy,” a rabid bicyclist pal of mine said. “They should put these lanes on Elston, Blue Island . . . and every diagonal street.”
What a nightmare that would be for everyone else on the road — commuters, truckers, little ol’ ladies going to the Jewel and guys like me.
Emanuel has said the new bike-path configuration makes riders safer on city roads. I get it. It is dangerous riding a bicycle in the big city. I once got “doored” on the North Side by a ditzy Jeep-driving woman from Ohio. Wear a helmet.
Urban cyclists have a right to co-exist with car drivers. And that’s how it should stay.
But if cyclists want sectioned-off lanes snaking through every part of the city, then the rules must change. They shouldn’t be able to ride freely through stop signs and pedal on the wrong side of the street anymore. Hit a pedestrian, go to jail. And heck, if cyclists need their own lanes, they should pay for it — maybe by requiring a bicycle sticker tax for commuters. And officers on bikes, Segways and ATVs should pinch more rogue cyclists who break the rules of the road.
Because if cyclists got treated more like the rest of us on the road, I might not get so honked off the next time a guy on a bike flips me the bird from his precious bike lane.
Maybe, but I doubt it.
Views: 237
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by in it to win it 8.0 mi on
-
I'm feeling sorry for poor Mark. Having to wait for the cyclists to start pedaling.
.
.
.
OK, I'm over it.
-
Permalink Reply by sten on
-
"Drivers are the new smokers."
I love it. Let's have that discussion. Let's talk about the drag on community resources and our overall health that driving has, and let's compare car deaths to smoking deaths.
Let's talk about food deserts, and sustainable cities and all the cool shit we *could* have if we designed Chicago for humans and not multi-ton wheelchairs.
Let's talk about how long it takes to drive to work with or without bike lanes, and compare that against the cost savings of having more bikes on the street and fewer cars.
Yeah, let's talk about drivers as the new smokers - unhealthy, unsustainable, a relic of an age when we didn't know better.
-
Permalink Reply by Gort 12-mile Pinklegneep on
-
In the last few years, the fees for city stickers, license plate renewal, gas taxes and even moving violation fines — which help pay for paving and repairing roads — have significantly increased. If you drive an SUV in Chicago, for instance, the price of your city sticker went from $75 to $120.
If you drive a SUV in chicago, you're probably ridiculous. So okay, you've got a $45 ridiculous fee.
Now, starting with this section of Kinzie, nearly a third of the road has been set aside for a pesky pedaling minority who take to the streets for only a part of the year.
Radical bicycle-riding advocates certainly will push to expand Emanuel’s segregated Bike Path system — and ruin every side-street shortcut for city drivers.
Only part of the year? Objection! So... he'd rather people ride more bikes longer? Well okay I'm down with that. I like the crycry about your sidestreet shortcut being lost. Now you can't barrel down narrow residentials to avoid the congestion you contribute to.
Some bicycle commuters are drooling at the prospect of a side-street bicycle takeover.
“Give me an entire street and I’ll be happy,” a rabid bicyclist pal of mine said. “They should put these lanes on Elston, Blue Island . . . and every diagonal street.”
Is this like how Glenn Beck will share an anecdote about His Liberal Friends?
-
-
There was a similar article in the new york times not long ago whining about how the bike lanes robbed a dude of his convenient free parking.
-
-
It's just as well to not follow the link because I'm pretty sure columns like this exist mainly to troll people into boosting their site traffic
-
Permalink Reply by Rhea Butcher on
-
I love the caption on the photo as well. " Vehicle traffic backs up along the Kinzie last month after lanes were reconfigured to give bicyclists their own curbside lane." That and putting "doored" in quotes.
So I'm guessing he's a smoker (or a recent quitter)? I don't know many people that would use smoking FOR their cause.
-
Permalink Reply by Rich S on
-
Drivers are the new smokers is a good analogy! As with cigarettes, the 2nd hand smoke of the automobile is more harmful to those around the smoker than to the actual smoker himself.
At least a cigarette can't run me over or door me!
-
Permalink Reply by Liz on
-
"“Give me an entire street and I’ll be happy,” a rabid bicyclist pal of mine said. “They should put these lanes on Elston, Blue Island . . . and every diagonal street.”"
Rabid? Was he foaming at the mouth? Did he try to bite the author? Rabid???
"And heck, if cyclists need their own lanes, they should pay for it — maybe by requiring a bicycle sticker tax for commuters."
He does realize that gas tax and city stickers contribute only around $100 milion to the budget, and the city spends about $2,768 million for streets, sanitation, and CDOT with $769 million going to CDOT alone, not that a pulitzer prize winning journalist needs to looks up facts or anything.
If he wanted the cost to be fair, I should be getting a tax refund for cycling, walking or taking public transporation instead of subsidising him.
-
-
To say nothing of actually belching out smoke.
Rich S said:Drivers are the new smokers is a good analogy! As with cigarettes, the 2nd hand smoke of the automobile is more harmful to those around the smoker than to the actual smoker himself.
At least a cigarette can't run me over or door me!
-
-
Yeah the grousing about cyclists not having to pay for a city sticker or similar taxes and are therefor stealing roads rightfully belonging to motorists when every cyclist is a net financial gain and every motorist is a net financial loss.
-
-
Thomas Friedman won three, and is actually now on the Pulitzer committee, so it's pretty safely in the domain of ridiculous trolls.
Cameron Puetz said:
Hard to believe that this troll won a Pulitzer.
Groups
-
Critical Mass discussion
262 members
-
Chicagoland Beer Explora…
203 members
-
Chicago Randonneurs
269 members
-
Walk Bike Transit
63 members
-
British Bicycles of Chic…
172 members
© 2008-2016 The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.
Powered by
