I have a feeling some of us on here have more bikes than we wish to admit. I'm up to 3 so far. Bianchi Road, Giant Mountain, and Trek Hybrid (which is currently abroad).

 

UPDATE (as of 6/8/11) - I'm up to 6 now... 2 aren't ride-able at the moment though.

Views: 598

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I cannot tell you how heart warming it is to know I am not alone.  I have 3 with 1 on order

2 ridables and 2 not-ridables -although one of those two non-ridables is a newly-purchased uni that I don't yet know how to ride so I can't really blame it for not being a ridable!

 

I need to set aside some time to pad up and give it a go.

I was asked one time 'how many bikes do you need?!' My reply was and still is -  'one more'.
I might only have a few bikes but I've got enough wheelsets hanging from my shelf to build 3 or 4 more.
I've got a ridable Touring, Tandem, City bike, and Cyclocross. Also a vintage french tack bike in a bunch of pieces in my closet. And, a custom on order... sheesh.

Really just one, my Heron Wayfarer.

 

I do have my '89 Haro Master, but I'm saving it for my children. I also have a '40s balloon tire bike in pieces I'd like to let go. I just want one bike.

 

Used to have tons of bikes, but not anymore. Some bikes I do admire are the TOEI, Grand Bois and Ebisu. And of course the super light Alex Singer bikes.

According to my friend Jeff, the correct answer is N+1, with N being the number you currently have!!!!

 

Your friend Jeff explained it wrong. The formula he mentioned is for the right number of bikes. Which makes me believe that N+2 constitutes overkill.

Larry said:

According to my friend Jeff, the correct answer is N+1, with N being the number you currently have!!!!

 

Sorry, I was referring to the number of bike that you need....  There is no such thing as overkill!!!!
n+1 < overkill < ∞
I have 3.... That is acceptable
"Acceptable". Ha!

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service