The Chainlink

Insights from the State's Attorney

Hi everyone:

We’d like to update you with some more insights and information on the Reza/Fabian case.

Active Trans staff met with three top officials from the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office on  Wednesday, July 14. It was a very productive meeting in the sense that we set the record straight and began building what could be a very fruitful relationship with some major players.

Here are some insights we gathered:
  • The State’s Attorney’s Office was just as disappointed as we were with the light sentences given to Armando Reza and Erik Fabian, who were convicted of intentionally running down cyclists with a car in Brookfield in 2009. The State’s Attorney’s Office assured us that they fought for penitentiary time. This wasn’t clear to us from the original Chicago Tribune article, which is why we encouraged everyone to contact Ms. Alvarez. It was good for us to hear that her office didn’t propose the light sentence that was handed down.
  • They also stressed to us that Ms. Alvarez and her entire office are committed to seeking justice in all cases. So, while our community doesn’t feel like justice was served in this case, they wanted us to communicate that they do continue to fight for it.
So moving forward, here is what we think this meeting could mean for us in the future:
  • We hope to be a resource to the State’s Attorney on cases involving bicyclists and pedestrians. In the same way, we have committed to reaching out to their office when we have a question about a certain case.
  • We believe there are opportunities to partner with the State’s Attorney’s Office on future legislative campaigns that seek to create stiffer and more equitable penalties for traffic crimes
    involving vulnerable users.
  • We also offered to provide ongoing training for Assistant State’s Attorneys assigned to traffic court on laws related to bicyclists and pedestrians.
  • Finally, we are connecting our new Crash Support Program with the State’s Attorney’s victim assistance program. Our hope is that when a victim or victim’s family is in need of help to process or heal from a crash experience, their office will refer them to us.

So what does it mean for us as a community? Well, a few things:
  • First, it means that we are being heard. The State’s Attorney’s office received hundreds of emails, letters and phone calls. Those responses initiated this meeting, and we have you – Active Trans members and supporters, and the cycling community at large – to thank for it.
    So thank you!
  • Now we have a connection, which means we have an opportunity to learn about serious traffic crimes earlier in the process, instead of reacting to a news story after the trial has concluded. If you hear about a case involving a bicyclist or pedestrian going to court, let us know so we can take proactive steps to address the situation. One thing to note: traffic court proceedings happen quickly. Not everything is a Blagojevich trial. There is rarely time to anticipate when a case will be scheduled in court. But the more we know, the better off we will be.
  • These incidents shape (and give credence to) what we fight for in Springfield. When we make our frustration and anger heard, it reverberates far beyond a single meeting.
These are some big systems we are trying to impact. So big, in fact, that sometimes it feels like nothing is changing. But we have seen here that wheels are spinning and movement is being made toward make biking and walking safer.

And let’s be honest – this won’t be the last instance of injustice we experience. That’s why we need to continue making our voices heard.

Thank you again to everyone who took the time to write a letter, send an email or make a phone call. You are fuel the movement.

Melody Geraci
Active Trans

Views: 38

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on July 15, 2010 at 8:30pm
Will post it as an event once we confirm there's no way to accommodate Gabe.

FYI this time/place was chosen b/c Break the Gridlock has a happening there at 7.

Ian said:
Quenchers at 9 on the 21st is good for me. Who's in?
Permalink Reply by Vilda on July 15, 2010 at 8:30pm
I work Mon-Fri 9a-5p and tues -thurs 6p-11p as well. Week days are hard. ;-(
Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on July 15, 2010 at 8:33pm
Monday the 19th, same time then?
Ian, would that work for you?

Gabe said:
I work Mon-Fri 9a-5p and tues -thurs 6p-11p as well. Week days are hard. ;-(
Permalink Reply by Ian on July 15, 2010 at 9:48pm
Monday isn't great, but if that's all Gabe can do, I will make it work.
Permalink Reply by Vilda on July 15, 2010 at 11:02pm
I can do! ;-) I still say make an events page and invite peeps! ;-)
Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on July 16, 2010 at 2:21am
'tis done. Event awaiting approval. 7/19, 9 PM, Quenchers.

Gabe said:
I can do! ;-) I still say make an events page and invite peeps! ;-)
Permalink Reply by Martin Hazard on July 16, 2010 at 2:29am
I want in on the round table. Is it decided for the 21st?
Permalink Reply by h' Zerocats on July 16, 2010 at 7:31am
Hmmm, let me try that last post again.
It is done, i.e. a Calendar entry has been made.
The calendar entry is (still) awaiting approval.
The round table will be Monday, July 19, 2010, at 9 P.M. at Quencher's Saloon.


Martin Hazard said:
I want in on the round table. Is it decided for the 21st?
Permalink Reply by Ian on July 16, 2010 at 7:39am
I can discuss the typical processes of the criminal courts in cases like this one and misdemeanors, like the new car vs. Bike statutes. I can also discuss practical crime victims' rights and what a victim can do to try to ensure restitution and retribution are part of the justice system in their cases. I cannot discuss civil liability issues, but there are some good attorneys on the chainlink who may wish to address this.
Permalink Reply by Vilda on July 16, 2010 at 8:13am
Make sure to invite 'em ;-)
Permalink Reply by Brendan Kevenides on July 16, 2010 at 9:20am
I'd be interested in hearing Ian talk about the criminal side of things. If there is an interest I'd be happy to discuss civil liability.

Brendan.

Ian said:
I can discuss the typical processes of the criminal courts in cases like this one and misdemeanors, like the new car vs. Bike statutes. I can also discuss practical crime victims' rights and what a victim can do to try to ensure restitution and retribution are part of the justice system in their cases. I cannot discuss civil liability issues, but there are some good attorneys on the chainlink who may wish to address this.
Permalink Reply by Active Transportation Alliance on July 16, 2010 at 4:28pm
FYI: Active Trans is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization and cannot support (or oppose) candidates or referendum items. We can lobby for new legislation such as the Stop for Pedestrians (HB 43) law that we pushed and got passed this year. We develop a Legislative Agenda each year and will be reaching out to our members soon for input on 2011 plans. We can educate our members/public on candidates and issues through our communication and things like Candidate Surveys (another current project) but we cannot take a stance on particular candidates.

Gabe said:
Also has the ATA thought about backing a Judge for replacement?

RSS

Groups

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service