The Chainlink

Bait Bikes: Clever Theft-Deterrent or Entrapment?

Hey Ya'll,

Searched the forum and didn't find this one posted (sorry if it was and I missed it):

http://www.good.is/post/bait-bikes-clever-theft-deterrent-or-entrap...

An interesting idea.  I take the legal notion of entrapment pretty seriously as a social justice issue, and don't support this strategy as a widespread tactic.  But it does seem to hold some promise for the biking community in cases where there are clear patterns of bike theft.  When my bike was stolen a couple of months ago, the method, neighborhood, and time of day all fit similar thefts over the past several months.  Plus, the GPS system described in the article has led to unearthing warehouses of stolen bikes. 

But authorities baiting the desperate, and often those most impacted by socioeconomic inequality, is a very slippery slope indeed.  What do you think?

Views: 385

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This happened to me some years ago. My bike was stolen out of my garage, and it bothered me to the Nth degree to have to pay for another. I didn't ride as much as I do now back then, and it really bothered me that I had to pay for another bike.

H3N3 said:
spacemodular said:
Another column on the same subject:
I feel that Bike theft keeps many people from riding bikes for the long term. They quit riding because they have no bike and feel it is a waste of money to invest in something that will just be stolen again.

Word . . . I've followed up with more than a few theft victims who were ready to hang it up and not try to replace the bike.
XV said:
Who's up for a chainlink bait bike? Think we can get the cops to come in time?..er ha forget that

I'm for it yo, but calling the cops would in reality get you nowhere special. This is a job for...

iggi said:
Baiting, with any cheepo lock is simply not entrapment. A lock...even if the bike is tied with a shoe string, indicates ownership and an intent of returning to the property.

yeah...if we were to put a bike next to a dumpster, and jump the shit out of a guy for trying to take it...yeah, thats not ok, and having him arrested for attempted theft...i would agree...entrapment.

now, in my case of a shoe string...is that 'leading them on'. absolutely!! it may be an invitation, but it simply expedites the process.

i see it no different than a female cop in a mini skirt and 22" heels on a dark corner under the L, and a dude tries to pick her up after a negotiation of 'services', and busts dude for picking up a hooker.

I wouldn't consider the shoe string to be leading someone on. They'd obviously be looking for stuff that's easy to steal. Now, a nice carbon Cervelo unlocked with no one around and a 'STEAL ME' sign next to it is a different story.

Oh, and 22" heels - I'll believe it when I see it.
I put a box of books on my curb yesterday because I'm perfectly aware that other people are perfectly aware they're free to take the ones they want. By your logic they're stealing and participating in a social dynamic worth comparison to slavery? Godwin might need to pass a new law.

Again, truly anyone outraged that they can't safely leave their property literally unattended is either truly not cut out for life in a town this big or is just plain stupid. And the cops should have better things to do than catch out people taking such property. This reminds me of the ridiculously stupid NYPD stings where they would drop wallets in the subways and then arrest people who picked them up—never mind that those people really had every right to do so, or even that they were probably just picking them up with the intention of finding their owners.

Bob Kastigar said:
Dr. Doom said:

If my neighbor sets out a snazzy hi-fi setup on the curb and I take it, am I stealing?
Yes, you are stealing.
I've lived in large cities my whole life and there's always been a social consensus that legitimately untended property is up for grabs. That social consensus is wrong - it encourages theft.

If it isn't yours you shouldn't take it unless someone has specifically given it to you are marked it as "free gift".

"Social consensus" accepted slavery at one time too.

.

an unlocked bike on someone's porch...off limits (tho very prone to theft)

an unlocked bike along a curb...free for the taking.

its quite simple really

Dr. Doom said:
I put a box of books on my curb yesterday because I'm perfectly aware that other people are perfectly aware they're free to take the ones they want. By your logic they're stealing and participating in a social dynamic worth comparison to slavery? Godwin might need to pass a new law.

Again, truly anyone outraged that they can't safely leave their property literally unattended is either truly not cut out for life in a town this big or is just plain stupid. And the cops should have better things to do than catch out people taking such property. This reminds me of the ridiculously stupid NYPD stings where they would drop wallets in the subways and then arrest people who picked them up—never mind that those people really had every right to do so, or even that they were probably just picking them up with the intention of finding their owners.

Bob Kastigar said:
Dr. Doom said:

If my neighbor sets out a snazzy hi-fi setup on the curb and I take it, am I stealing?
Yes, you are stealing.
I've lived in large cities my whole life and there's always been a social consensus that legitimately untended property is up for grabs. That social consensus is wrong - it encourages theft.

If it isn't yours you shouldn't take it unless someone has specifically given it to you are marked it as "free gift".

"Social consensus" accepted slavery at one time too.

.

yep.

You leave it unattended in a public place you may as well give it away.

iggi said:
an unlocked bike on someone's porch...off limits (tho very prone to theft)

an unlocked bike along a curb...free for the taking.

its quite simple really

Dr. Doom said:
I put a box of books on my curb yesterday because I'm perfectly aware that other people are perfectly aware they're free to take the ones they want. By your logic they're stealing and participating in a social dynamic worth comparison to slavery? Godwin might need to pass a new law.

Again, truly anyone outraged that they can't safely leave their property literally unattended is either truly not cut out for life in a town this big or is just plain stupid. And the cops should have better things to do than catch out people taking such property. This reminds me of the ridiculously stupid NYPD stings where they would drop wallets in the subways and then arrest people who picked them up—never mind that those people really had every right to do so, or even that they were probably just picking them up with the intention of finding their owners.

Bob Kastigar said:
Dr. Doom said:

If my neighbor sets out a snazzy hi-fi setup on the curb and I take it, am I stealing?
Yes, you are stealing.
I've lived in large cities my whole life and there's always been a social consensus that legitimately untended property is up for grabs. That social consensus is wrong - it encourages theft.

If it isn't yours you shouldn't take it unless someone has specifically given it to you are marked it as "free gift".

"Social consensus" accepted slavery at one time too.

.

Doom is right. Dropping a wallet and arresting someone is entrapment. More over it isn't always a crime to pick up a wallet or anything dropped by someone. First because you cannot prove the intent of the actor picking up the item and secondly State property laws vary. This also means that it is not necessarily a crime to pick up a bike that isn't yours if it is unlocked and seems abandoned. Property ownership has some grey areas when we are talking about abandoned and salvage property and each State defines this differently.

Check out IL ST CH 765 § 1020/0.01 - 36
Cutifly, I agree. That's why I am not a lawyer. ; ) Regarding cases specifically regarding theft. I don't know of any off hand. I am sure they exist but if they are not well known or taken to a federal level they tend not to be precedent setting cases and thus are not really applicable in every case like the three I cited.

cutifly said:
I briefly read over the first page of Wiki, I did not really see anything relating to theft or stolen property, Just child porn and narcotics. Is there anything else you may be aware (in regards to the court) in direct relation to theft or stolen property ? I do so much enjoy reading about these court cases and thank you for the time to look this up... I would hate myself if I had to put myself through law school when I despise so many things in society and would just rather enjoy my life...
Spencer "Thunderball" Thayer! said:
And no this isn't entrapment.
A defense attorney can only use Entrapment as a defense against a criminal charge if law enforcement agents attempted to force or convince the defendant to commit an offense which the defendant would otherwise have not have committed. Woo Wai v. United States, 223 F.1d 412 (9th Cir. 1915), Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 (1932) and Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992).
Another possible solution...

http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/man-makes-cellphone.html
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-To-End-Bike-Theft-The-Honeybike...

The legality of this is questionable as anyone injured from a booby trapped bike could likely sue its owner, but the results are still hilarious! For tech-minded and electronics savvy individuals out there, this might be the ticket:)
Would taking my brakes off be conciderd booby trapping?
no, thats hipstering your bike

Davo said:
Would taking my brakes off be conciderd booby trapping?
but you do suggest a great idea...

keep the brakes on there, just detach the cable. and then lets watch them take off on the bike.

Davo said:
Would taking my brakes off be conciderd booby trapping?

RSS

© 2008-2016   The Chainlink Community, L.L.C.   Powered by

Disclaimer  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service